- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: South Park teaser for tonight's premier
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:31 am to blueboy
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:31 am to blueboy
quote:
A guy went to prison over a Hillary meme but CBS basically campaigning for Kamala is A okay.
You know the difference between a civil suit and a criminal suit? Trump wasn’t going to win a civil suit on the basis that the doctored 60 Minute interview hampered him winning an election…. That he won…
quote:
Squirm harder.
The frick does this even mean
0
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:33 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:He's being disingenuous. Those episodes were mild at best and they have been pulled from the catalog. The awesome 200th episode has never been available for streaming.
Have they done one in over a decade? Legit don't remember if they've really done one since the Muhammad episodes in season 14.
So he's kind of proving your point.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:33 am to blueboy
quote:
Because it was clear election interference.
man, if you think shortening a rambling answer to make it shorter for time or to form a coherent answer = election interference, do I have some bad news for you about fox news
that PSA was nuts, and will almost assuredly be a perfect example of the streisand effect in real time
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:36 am to blueboy
quote:
He's being disingenuous. Those episodes were mild at best and they have been pulled from the catalog. The awesome 200th episode has never been available for streaming.
So he's kind of proving your point.
Not even my point. I don't think anyone would argue that South Park at one point in time wouldn't take great shots at everyone. I think the point the other poster is trying to make is that they've by and large recently, just done the same safe trope. But yea, making an argument around something they haven't done in that long of a time is pretty much the point at hand.
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 10:41 am
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:37 am to Celtic Tiger
quote:Yeah? Like what? Let's hear it, with links to them editing in a different answers to questions and completely frankensteining an interview because of a clear preference for one candidate.
I have some bad news for you about fox news
frick them. I'm glad they got called out and were forced to pay.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:44 am to blueboy
quote:
Yeah? Like what? Let's hear it, with links to them editing in a different answers to questions and completely frankensteining an interview because of a clear preference for one candidate.
one you will ignore bc cnn but you can look elsewhere yourself
another
particularly timely one
that's just some of the first page of a google search. that's all the time I will spend, especially since it will be explained away, anyway. but that's probably more a PT topic and I don't want to derail this thread
Matt and Trey seriously give no fricks
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:55 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Have they done one in over a decade?
That's a completely different question.
Regardless, South Park has an almost 30 year track record of going after EVERYBODY. It's childish to complain they didn't go after x because they went after y, who happens to be on your team.
And for the record, I think Trump is great and went to Catholic schools all my life.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:56 am to Celtic Tiger
quote:Worse than that, they aired the deleted portion on a different CBS news program prior to the 60 Minutes episode. The clip that they "edited out" had already aired as a teaser for the 60 Minutes interview.
man, if you think shortening a rambling answer to make it shorter for time or to form a coherent answer = election interference, do I have some bad news for you about fox news
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:57 am to Celtic Tiger
quote:and MSNBC, and Daily Beast with a registration wall.
one you will ignore bc cnn
They did more than just shorten an answer. That's a lie.
If the others think they have a case against Fox, let them bring it.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:00 am to blueboy
quote:
So he's kind of proving your point.
Are you talking about me?
I was replying to a poster that seemed to believe they've never gone after Islam. You know that's factually incorrect.
You guys aren't even acting childish at this point, you're acting like babies.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:04 am to southdowns84
quote:
That's a completely different question.
Not really, it is very much related.
quote:
Regardless, South Park has an almost 30 year track record of going after EVERYBODY. It's childish to complain they didn't go after x because they went after y, who happens to be on your team.
You not see how the previous question is related? If they've not done something in well over a decade, yet consistently use the same core jokes in this episode that they've done since 2016, wouldn't that just be going for the low hanging fruit?
Again, I didn't hate the episode by any means. If it was a one off, great. If it is going to be another Trump centric season, I'm going to be disappointed. They've done that ad nauseam.
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 11:06 am
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:08 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
If it is going to be another Trump centric season
Felt like a first for me. The other episodes were just Mr. Garrison in orange face.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:08 am to southdowns84
quote:
You guys aren't even acting childish at this point, you're acting like babies.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:17 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
Felt like a first for me. The other episodes were just Mr. Garrison in orange face.
That's fine
. I'm also hoping they start moving away from the PC stuff. I think it has run its course too.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:17 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
So...just easy targets with no risk whatsoever?
Yes, because Trump has never shown a tendency towards retaliation against media that criticizes him.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:18 am to dblwall
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:21 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Not really, it is very much related.
Questioning that they'd ever do a show about Islam is a question that's already been answered.
Questioning if they've done a show about Islam in the last two decades is a question I don't immediately know how to answer.
Do you see the difference?
quote:
If they've not done something in well over a decade, yet consistently use the same core jokes in this episode that they've done since 2016, wouldn't that just be going for the low hanging fruit?
I don't really take issue with this, but I also think Islam might be the lowest possible hanging fruit that there is.
I think we may be talking past each other.
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 11:36 am
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:21 am to dblwall
non 0 chance thats a real post
Posted on 7/24/25 at 11:23 am to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
If it is going to be another Trump centric season, I'm going to be disappointed. They've done that ad nauseam.
I 100% agree with you here, btw.
Page 5 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News