Started By
Message

re: S4: the Bob Lazar story

Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:38 am to
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
156584 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:38 am to
quote:

You do know/realize, unless you still live in the Swamp with no electricity, that the US has Back Engineered Unidentified Alien Craft and other mysterious, unexplainable tech.

Wait, what?
quote:

And even if you're just being obstinate, argumentative you would still have to admit that the US, Russia, etc. WOULD absolutely back engineer alien craft if/when they could.

Of course. Zero people would believe otherwise.

But what does "they would if the could" have to do with it being factual that they have?
Posted by Challenger2006
Member since Mar 2014
220 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:13 pm to
Lazar’s story has actually remained consistent, he’s revised some things based on new ideas/tech through the decades (like 3d printing), but the jist of his story remains, and he without a doubt has/had knowledge of S4 before anyone ever heard the name Area 51.

I personally believe that he lied about his education history and is dug in on that part of the story.

I don’t actually find any of the main players to be trustworthy; Knapp, clown Corbell, Elizondo, Mellon, Gary Nolan, Richard Dolan, Bigelow, least of all Eric Davis… not a one of them would I trust any more or less than Lazar.

I believe David Fravor, but if the tic tac was ever disclosed as black tech, I’d lose interest in the UAP phenomenon all together.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16648 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Did they talk about the illegal brothel he and his much older, murdering biker skank wife were busted running?

Curious about what level of significance you think being involved with a brothel has on his story.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16648 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

No one can verify his stories. Character is a freaking huge issue if you are deciding if you can believe someone.

If this was true, we would not have government prosecutors using confidential informants and co-defendants to testify against primary targets.

Credibility should be explored, but criminal behavior is never an automatic disqualifier.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65378 posts
Posted on 4/21/26 at 6:45 pm to
It speaks to his low character and whether or not he's a grifter, which he 100% definitely is.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram