- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Paramount Has Canceled 'Star Trek 4
Posted on 1/10/19 at 4:50 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Posted on 1/10/19 at 4:50 pm to Fewer Kilometers
I thought Beyond was good, but I didn't like the first two. I really hope the destruction of Romulus in the Prime timeline is made not canon and all this swept under the rug.
1
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:01 pm to Parmen
quote:
really hope the destruction of Romulus in the Prime timeline is made not canon and all this swept under the rug.
Whatever you do, do not read about the new Picard show.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:03 pm to Fewer Kilometers
They weren't the best films but not totally horrible either; although I'm always reminded of the following when people mention the new Star Trek films:
NSFW language - It's perfectly in Spock's character - NSFW language
NSFW language - It's perfectly in Spock's character - NSFW language
This post was edited on 1/10/19 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 1/10/19 at 5:29 pm to Fewer Kilometers
I liked the first one, but I predicted what they would do after they resolved that plot with time travel. I said they'd throw in old characters and stories, reworked because of the "time line," and make them do whatever they wanted.
They thought they were being clever by doing this and that it would allow them to regurgitate old Star Trek shite indefinitely, but all it did was underscore the utterly formulaic structures of the next two movies.
And then we all had to be shown that yes, Sulu is definitely gay. See? He's with a dude, and they have a kid. Look everyone. Sulu is definitely a homo.
Even IRL gay Sulu thought that was stupid.
They thought they were being clever by doing this and that it would allow them to regurgitate old Star Trek shite indefinitely, but all it did was underscore the utterly formulaic structures of the next two movies.
And then we all had to be shown that yes, Sulu is definitely gay. See? He's with a dude, and they have a kid. Look everyone. Sulu is definitely a homo.
Even IRL gay Sulu thought that was stupid.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 6:32 pm to Fewer Kilometers
disappointing, I love these movies
Posted on 1/10/19 at 6:37 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Hemsworth was in this?
Posted on 1/10/19 at 6:46 pm to Fewer Kilometers
those movies were pretty good , why not make more
Posted on 1/10/19 at 8:19 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
Paramount had little choice but to walk away from a movie likely to cost as much as Transformers but earn about as much as Bumblebee.
Good writing.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 9:00 pm to UMRealist
Hemsworth was Kirk’s dad in the prologue of the first movie IIRC.
Posted on 1/10/19 at 9:57 pm to teke184
Yeah I know but Why are they acting like he’s in the main cast?
Posted on 1/10/19 at 10:09 pm to UMRealist
He would have had a big part in the movie - the plan for ST 4 was a time travel visit with Kirk's dad.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 8:50 am to Fewer Kilometers
Good. The first one was a fun space adventure. The third one was like a terrible fan fiction. Into Darkness pissed me off so bad I yelled at me wife that night.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 1:53 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:
Good. The first one was a fun space adventure. The third one was like a terrible fan fiction. Into Darkness pissed me off so bad I yelled at me wife that night.
The second one was so bad that I haven't watched it again and didn't go see the 3rd. And I am a huge Star Trek fan. Glad they aren't making anymore. I'll just watch The Orville
Posted on 1/11/19 at 2:00 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
The third was so bad it might have killed Ace if he had watched it.
Those movies don't want to tangle with me, son.
There is a difference between building on a legacy (for the long-term future) and pure, raw, unchecked exploitation of an existing brand.
As most of you are well aware, I'm clearly in the camp that puts Abrams' films in the latter category. I'm sure there will be some attempt to re-reboot the film franchise in 5 to 7 years with an all female cast or whatever (Have Chris Hemsworth play A'huro, the tall, vapid communications officer).
And I won't watch that shite, either.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 2:17 pm to boxcarbarney
Posted on 1/11/19 at 9:18 pm to Ace Midnight
The third one was bad. I felt personally insulted by Into Darkness.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News