Started By
Message

re: My 9 y/o daughter's conclusion after seeing the climax in League of Their Own

Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:12 pm to
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17108 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

You keep proving that it isn't, with each consecutive post.

You have no concrete evidence to support your minority view, therefore your assumption of the Galileo identity is completely invalid


You obviously don't understand what analogy means.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82018 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

You obviously don't understand what analogy means.
On what basis do you make that claim?
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 5:13 pm
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60784 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

Also, chick barehanded a fastball but couldn't hold on during a collision with an infinitely familiar opponent? Right


This is just reaching for bull shite, the 2 are completely unrealted. That's like saying because MJ makes a 35 footer, they only way he could miss a free throw is on purpose. Try again.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17108 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

No, that was commentary on one post. I have engaged this debate quite deliberately and thoroughly


It was idiotic commentary and quite off base.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82018 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

It was idiotic commentary
Wait. . .what?

How was it idiotic? Was I wrong?
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82018 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

This is just reaching for bull shite, the 2 are completely unrealted.
How are they unrelated? I am not saying A+B=C. I am saying that A and B being true makes C more likely.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17108 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

On what basis do you make that claim?



On the basis that you keep harping on whether he has scientific evidence to prove his point and if not, then the analogy must somehow be invalid. That is absolutely irrelevant to whether or not the analogy can still be valid or not. But I don't expect you to understand that after reading your dumb post on "disrespect to the English language" regarding the most basic of typos when the sentence structure was still perfectly legitimate and legible. You have a child-like approach. You just aren't a very intelligent or strong debater IMO.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35751 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:24 pm to
Whoa, let's sow down here before this turns into the Poli Board.

As wrong as your are Roaad, thank you for being respectful. Besides that, bless your heart and God help ya.
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 5:25 pm
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17108 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Wait. . .what?

How was it idiotic? Was I wrong?



Yes. It was an obvious typo and the sentence was still structurally sound and legible in spite of it even. You blew it out of proportion to try and discredit something about the post rather than to address the pertinent subject matter. It's a really frequently used method on message boards and is quite telling.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82018 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

On the basis that you keep harping on whether he has scientific evidence to prove his point and if not, then the analogy must somehow be invalid.
Because the analogy is that he is like Galileo, when many thought the Earth was the center of the universe.

He then takes that as his identity, as he says "call me".

I then ascribed the analogy to him, for the sake of "fleshing it out".

And then you guys cried foul.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82018 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

It was an obvious typo
A typo is hitting the wrong key.

You used the wrong word, entirely

quote:

You blew it out of proportion
I made one isolated post about it. I never used it to counter your position.

You blew it out of proportion by trying to use it to invalidate my position.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82018 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

Whoa, let's sow down here before this turns into the Poli Board.

As wrong as your are Roaad, thank you for being respectful. Besides that, bless your heart and God help ya.



I only have one gear, sadly.

I will drop it.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17108 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:31 pm to
You're just reading way too much into it. The pertinent analogical reference is that Galileo was ostracized because he was one of the few going against an overwhelming majority who took another position. Obviously being in the minority did not make him wrong. The analogy is inherently valid on this basis alone.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
82018 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

Obviously being in the minority did not make him wrong.
No. But the prevailing view is valid, until concrete evidence is presented to refute.

Generally speaking, if everyone is wrong, and you are right. . .you are wrong.

Anyone in their thirties who remembers themselves at 18, knows this little proverb to be true.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17108 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

A typo is hitting the wrong key.

You used the wrong word, entirely



bullshite. A typo can be using the wrong word as well so long as the error is one of negligence such as your/you're, than/then, etc. I've gone through and proofread many a paper where I made all kinds of little errors like that out of negligence. Do you honestly think I don't know the difference in how to use those words?

quote:

I made one isolated post about it. I never used it to counter your position.



Why would you even make a post on it? It was ONE typo of you're which should have been your. You then referenced how hard the sentence was to read and how terrible it was grammatically. You don't think you blew that out of proportion?

quote:

You blew it out of proportion by trying to use it to invalidate my position.


What? All I did was refute your post regarding my "disrespect for the English language" which I found extremely odd and out of place.

Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17108 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:45 pm to
That being said, this is all discussion on logical consistency and semantics, discussions which I enjoy having as it is, but is getting off subject of the actual topic. Thus I will digress.
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33314 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 6:27 pm to
I apologize for posting again in this thread. My posts were really just a long time continuation of me trying to be the class clown.

I don't really care whether she dropped the ball on purpose or not. I haven't thought about it since I walked out of the theater in 1992. Because some of you do care, I will leave you guys to argue and cease to make jokes about something that is so serious to another human being.
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 7:14 pm
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35751 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 7:14 pm to
Okay I'm going to end this for all objective readers of this thread and this should end the debate once and for all, but I know it won't.

The facts are:

-Dottie came back to the series for the 7th and final game. The assumption is that she came back because she wanted to win, not make sure here little sister's ego get a boost. If you want to call that speculation, then okay. But she did come back for the 7th game.

-Dottie is facing Kit in the top of the 9th and hits in 2 go ahead runs against her little sister. Logic will tell you that if she wanted to let her sister win, she could have done it here. But she didn't.

-When Kit is up to bat, Dottie tells Ellen Sue that she can't lay off of the high ones. Again the logical conclusion here is she wants her to strike out, and isn't trying to boost her ego.

-So Kit hits the ball, ties the game, but knowing there will be a play at the plate, still advances toward home ignoring the 3rd base coach. Dottie doesn't realize this until she has already rounded third base and is heading home.

-At this point, if Dottie wanted her to win, she could let the throw home get by her or bobble the ball around a little; but instead she makes a clean catch and turns to face Kit with the intention of tagging her.

-Now, the ONLY time Dottie could have made the decision to let Kit score is at this moment. Because at no other point before this does she give any inclination that she wants Kit to win the game.

So the "Dottie did it on purpose" crowd would have us all believe that right here, with no previous inclination from the movie, and nothing afterward that would draw you to that conclusion, Dottie dropped the ball on purpose.

This is a completely speculative opinion and is not based on any facts or events that lead up to the collision.

What really happened was, Kit turned the corner against her coaches commands, bulled Dottie over, and finally beat her big sister. Dottie smiles at her because she is happy for her.

I realize that some of you will still disagree, and it makes your vag feel good to say that Dottie did it on purpose. But you are not giving any credit to Kit for doing it on her own, and you are not thinking logically.
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33314 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 7:16 pm to
Sorry dude,

I posted my "joke" before I saw you guys had turned this into life and death. After I got this far and saw the seriousness of the debate, I edited my last post.

Have a great 2012!
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35751 posts
Posted on 12/28/11 at 7:18 pm to
Not bothering me.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram