- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My 9 y/o daughter's conclusion after seeing the climax in League of Their Own
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:44 pm to coloradoBengal
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:44 pm to coloradoBengal
quote:
It was a woman doing something you don't understand, so concoct the solution in your male mind.
What's funny is my sisters believe she dropped it on purpose too. Obviously whatever the answer there is no doubt that...
Dropping it on purpose because she loves her sister and thinks nothing of betraying her team (and sport) is the FEMALE perspective.
Dropped it because Kit raised her game while Dottie was losing heart and the film needed to let her go home without regrets at still being the best is the MALE perspective.
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 4:46 pm
0
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:47 pm to Roaad
quote:
frick me. . .I've gone crosseyed.
You must be, because your post asserting that is just above.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:47 pm to Roaad
quote:YES. Because none of the events of the movie leading up to the home plate collision support your argument.
Is your evidence more concrete than the opposition
quote:
or is it also just based on your subjective analysis?
Do you really not understand that it is your argument that is subjective?
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:51 pm to Roaad
quote:
If by scientific evidence you mean evidence from the movie then yes.
Is your evidence more concrete than the opposition, or is it also just based on your subjective analysis?
I just looked up the boxscore for the game an E2 was charged in the 9th on the visting team and the final run was scored as unearned. So based on the scorekeeper's view she dropped it on purpose.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:51 pm to alajones
quote:splain, using concrete examples of your assertion, without subjective analysis.
YES.
quote:I understand that both of our positions are based on subjective analysis. However, I did not equate myself with Galileo to wiggle out of a proverb.
Do you really not understand that it is your argument that is subjective?
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:52 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
I just looked up the boxscore for the game an E2 was charged in the 9th on the visting team and the final run was scored as unearned. So based on the scorekeeper's view she dropped it on purpose.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:53 pm to alajones
quote:
Do you really not understand that it is your argument that is subjective?
I love when people don't understand that subjective arguments can be made more or less valid by use of context and support. They just argue "it's all subjective!" as if no one's argument is any stronger than the others.
I'm telling you alajones, you are going to go insane trying to argue with the adamant "dropped it on purposers".
There can be no diplomacy to settle our differences, only war. I've come to terms with this, and I am ready.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:53 pm to ChewyDante
quote:I was responding to your blatant disrespect for the English language.
You must be, because your post asserting that is just above.
I am no Grammar-Nazi, but your sentence hurt my head.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:55 pm to Roaad
quote:
I understand that both of our positions are based on subjective analysis. However, I did not equate myself with Galileo to wiggle out of a proverb.
Quit being so f'ing obtuse. He used the Galileo comparison to counter your idiotic "more people think this so you must be wrong" line of thinking. You really don't understand that analogy? Jesus...
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:57 pm to ChewyDante
quote:And I invalidated his assumption of that identity.
He used the Galileo comparison to counter your idiotic
quote:indeed.
so f'ing obtuse
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:57 pm to Roaad
quote:
concrete examples
she came BACK to the team in the middle of the championship series because she realized how bad she wanted it*
final game when she was playing her arse off and helping her team to win the game with great hitting and a top notch performance on defense*
Kit was barreling towards home (defying the stop call mind you) and Dottie secured the throw and turned to face the runner.*
She clearly couldn't have planned it ahead of time, so you must believe she made this conflicting decision in a couple of seconds. And the movie then made no mention or even hint of it afterward.*
But what is in the movie is Dottie telling Georgia Peach how to strike out Kitt. Why would she do that if she wanted Kitt to win?
Now please give me your concrete, non-subjective reasons.
*credit given to Chewy.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 4:59 pm to Roaad
quote:No you didn't. It was a perfect analogy.
And I invalidated his assumption of that identity.
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:03 pm to alajones
quote:Fact
she came BACK to the team in the middle of the championship series
quote:subjective analysis.
because she realized how bad she wanted it*
quote:Facts
final game when she was playing her arse off and helping her team to win the game with great hitting and a top notch performance on defense*
Kit was barreling towards home (defying the stop call mind you) and Dottie secured the throw and turned to face the runner.*
quote:Fact. . .sorta.
She clearly couldn't have planned it ahead of time, so you must believe she made this conflicting decision in a couple of seconds.
quote:Says you.
And the movie then made no mention or even hint of it afterward.*
quote:She decided to drop it when Kit rounded 3rd.
But what is in the movie is Dottie telling Georgia Peach how to strike out Kitt. Why would she do that if she wanted Kitt to win?
quote:I never claimed to have them, you did.
Now please give me your concrete, non-subjective reasons.
The facts you stated are not concrete evidences toward either assertion, fwiw.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:05 pm to alajones
quote:You keep proving that it isn't, with each consecutive post.
No you didn't. It was a perfect analogy.
You have no concrete evidence to support your minority view, therefore your assumption of the Galileo identity is completely invalid
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:06 pm to Roaad
quote:How do you know that?
She decided to drop it when Kit rounded 3rd.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:07 pm to Roaad
quote:Just because you aren't willing to accept it.
You have no concrete evidence to support your minority view,
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:09 pm to alajones
quote:The strategic placement of the montage, based on my own subjective analysis.
How do you know that?
Also, chick barehanded a fastball but couldn't hold on during a collision with an infinitely familiar opponent? Right.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:09 pm to alajones
quote:Lack of compelling evidence.
Just because you aren't willing to accept it.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:09 pm to Roaad
quote:
I was responding to your blatant disrespect for the English language.
I am no Grammar-Nazi, but your sentence hurt my head.
Wow. You are such a child and clearly outmatched in this debate that you would turn to this tactic.
An obvious typo of you're/your in which the word is properly used at the tail end of the same sentence and you reference it as "blatant disrespect for the English language?"
Talk about obtuse.
Posted on 12/28/11 at 5:11 pm to ChewyDante
quote:No, that was commentary on one post. I have engaged this debate quite deliberately and thoroughly.
you would turn to this tactic.
This post was edited on 12/28/11 at 5:12 pm
Page 5 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News