Started By
Message

Interstellar - things you LOVED and HATED about this movie

Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:28 am
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:28 am
Compared to other movies it's excellent.

However, compared to other Christopher Nolan movies I thought it was just alright. The Prestige is still Christopher Nolan's best movie to date.

I think Interstellar suffered from Christopher Nolan unintentionally mimicking Stanley Kubrick. That's the kind of movie that screams Kubrick. I almost wish he would've went in a completely different direction.

Plus, the movie suffers from too much going on conceptually.

Interstellar certainly begs for multiple viewings, but in reference to Chris Nolan filsm for the first time I don't really care to watch it again.

Which is a shame and disappointment.
This post was edited on 4/2/15 at 2:07 pm
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36418 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:32 am to
quote:


I think Interstellar suffered from Christopher Nolan unintentionally mimicking Stanley Kubrick. That's the kind of movie that screams Kubrick. I almost wish he would've went in a completely different direction.

Plus, the movie suffers from too much going on conceptually.



The main problem with it was that it went from Kubrick to conventional pretty quickly. The last 1/4th was wrapped up wayyy too nicely- to the point of being sappy and uninspired. I didn't have a problem with the conceptual ambitions that dominated most of it. But it really cratered with the whole bookcase nonsense.

It's never good to go from Kubrick to Capra in one movie.
Posted by UsingUpAllTheLetters
Stuck in Transfer Portal
Member since Aug 2011
8508 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:33 am to
quote:

But it really cratered with the whole bookcase nonsense.
It gave me the feeling he was rushing the script ahead of a deadline he forgot about.
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22775 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Just watched Interstellar


Me to.

quote:

Plus, the movie suffers from too much going on conceptually.


This, I did not have a problem with, but the dialougue needed to explain those concepts to viewers was detrimental to the movie. The characters were monotonous and underdeveloped for the most part. Hathaway was terrible. It's my main problem with the movie. The robot (TARS) had the best (timed) lines, IMO.

Visually and conceptually, I thought it was amazing. I even loved the ending. I thought it was a much better direction than just saying "aliens did it.".
This post was edited on 4/2/15 at 11:36 am
Posted by Sellecks Moustache
NC
Member since Jun 2014
5994 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:35 am to
I enjoyed it. 2nd favorite non-Batman trilogy film of his behind Memento. Didn't think it had any Kubrick elements to it, which made me happy because 2001 was basically "CHECK THIS shite OUT, THIS shite WAS MADE IN 1968!!!".
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:41 am to
It was so beautiful and very good. The characters weren't too strong, but it was shaping up to be great science fiction movie

Then Christopher Nolan feeling the need to have a happy ending that would blow the mind ruined everything


SPOILERS







loved the scene where they open dr mann's chamber

It was like opening dracula's tomb and there was a sense of dread even though you didn't know he was a bad guy. Just love that shot.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:42 am to
You nailed it

It went from 2001 to schlock almost instantly and right at the end
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28897 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:43 am to
quote:

But it really cratered with the whole bookcase nonsense.

It's never good to go from Kubrick to Capra in one movie.


best way i've heard it summarized to date.

[SPOILERISH]

i mean i love it and it was lightyears ahead of what gets nominated a lot of times at award shows, but that last 15 minutes till the last 5 was just to much BS for me to handle in the scope of the awesomeness of the movie. the ending itself i liked. just not what got us from Cooper entering the black hole to waking up on the megaship.

i would still say it's the best film experience i've had in 5+ years and lands somewhere in the top 20-30 overall.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112329 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:48 am to
You watched interstellar at 9 in the morning?
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28897 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:49 am to
quote:

You watched interstellar at 9 in the morning?



you think time matters to Killz?
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36418 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:50 am to
quote:


i mean i love it and it was lightyears ahead of what gets nominated a lot of times at award shows, but that last 15 minutes till the last 5 was just to much BS for me to handle in the scope of the awesomeness of the movie. the ending itself i liked. just not what got us from Cooper entering the black hole to waking up on the megaship.


Yea I definitely enjoyed it overall, but you're dead on about the time frame between the black hole and Cooper waking up. I liked the very end but that segment was just bad.
Posted by Tommy Wayne
Member since Apr 2009
208 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 11:58 am to
I liked the bookshelf scene. I was thinking about it last night after watching it. I think to visually portray the 5th dimension, and its complexity, I dont anyone who would know how else to create it better.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 12:08 pm to
I love the way it was shot, there are countless examples that are just unique to the movie (and Nolan I guess)

but I didn't think it was visually more impressive than planet of the apes, nor did it have any tension until almost 1/2 way through the movie.

Even with all of that, it was just so epic and awesome and I was thinking "this is why I like the movies" and then the god damn singularity/bookshelf/builtbyfuturehumans nonsense started and fricking drove me insane...it ALMOST ruined the movie. That says a lot because the movie to that point was great.

no one really knows what happens in a black hole, I think it's safe to assume that you get crushed to such a small size we can't even comprehend, but I do know that there isn't any stupid bookshelves made by humans so you can ghost stalk your daughter and create a motherfricking headache paradox
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89531 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

I think Interstellar suffered from Christopher Nolan unintentionally mimicking Stanley Kubrick. That's the kind of movie that screams Kubrick. I almost wish he would've went in a completely different direction.


It is an intentional homage to 2001 - executed almost perfectly. Every movie has holes. I enjoyed this one immensely.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108403 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Visually and conceptually, I thought it was amazing. I even loved the ending. I thought it was a much better direction than just saying "aliens did it.".



Yeah, that really turned me off at the start of the movie that aliens apparently did this, but then in the twist, it's revealed to be 5th dimensional humans from the future, that was brilliant to me. I think I would have liked if it were more subtle and largely unsaid only for watchers of the film to figure it out weeks later, but don't think that would have worked for the masses
This post was edited on 4/2/15 at 12:14 pm
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 12:16 pm to
The ending to me was so nonsensical and screamed mass appeal actually.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 12:21 pm to
The moment I heard them explain a complicated science matter and then use a simple analogy so that the audience doesn't feel stupid, I thought "ace is going to love this shite" I guess you know what I'm referencing.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22152 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

I think Interstellar suffered from Christopher Nolan unintentionally mimicking Stanley Kubrick.

That was one of my favorite things about the movie. It was so visually satisfying and different from all of the CGI artistry that we typically get in these types of movie. It has been a long time since this type of film was mad.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150742 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Compared to other movies it's excellent.

However, compared to other Christopher Nolan movies I thought it was just alright. The Prestige is still Christopher Nolan's best movie to date.

Agree with 100% of that.

I really liked Interstellar, but it was a movie that was incredible for most of the movie, and then the end made it just "really good" for me. I get that it was based on theoretical physics/science and all that, but it just sort of fell flat for me and the ending made a lot of things unnecessary. However, I definitely appreciate what they were trying to accomplish, and wish more directors would do things like that.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150742 posts
Posted on 4/2/15 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Didn't think it had any Kubrick elements to it

Then I feel like you missed the majority of the movie.

I mean shite, they (one of the robots) even made direct jokes about 2001 in the dialogue.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram