Started By
Message

re: GoT S6: E10 "The Winds of Winter" BOOK READERS

Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:31 pm to
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108040 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 4:31 pm to
Ceresi and Tommen isn't going to be around long enough for LF's decree to mean shite. That was just his insurance before he knew JS was looking to take back Winterfell and to remove the Boltons.
Posted by ladytiger118
Member since Aug 2009
20922 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 5:14 pm to
Exactly. LF knows that the Faith Militant has taken over KL thanks to Cersei's stupidity, and that the Lannisters' hold on the throne is basically done at this point.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Ceresi and Tommen isn't going to be around long enough for LF's decree to mean shite. That was just his insurance before he knew JS was looking to take back Winterfell and to remove the Boltons.



To be honest I think it's in LF's best interest for that decree to remain secret.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

honest I think it's in LF's best interest for that decree to remain secret.


Wouldn't surprise me if Jon did what Cersei did with Robert's decree that Ned was to be King Regent after he died and tell LF to whipe his arse with that decree then kill LF.

Eta: I should walk that back and say I would love for Jon to do that if LF told him that he had a decree.

Although, that would pretty much force the south to move on the north.
This post was edited on 6/23/16 at 5:36 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Wouldn't surprise me if Jon did what Cersei did with Robert's decree that Ned was to be King Regent after he died and tell LF to whipe his arse with that decree.



What advantage does he have by presenting that decree? Literally no one outside of the Freys north of King's Landing is going to take it seriously. Everyone knows the Lannisters are fricked, and LF has now openly betrayed them. I see no reason why he'd ever use this, since it will only serve to make people even more suspicious of him and why Cersei would grant him such a title.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 5:41 pm to
I know he wouldn't do that. More of a "what if" situation.
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
16257 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

I can never see LF crowning Jon Snow. There's no way he doesn't feel highly threatened by him.

LF won't have a choice if Jon is backed by the other Northern Houses. His entire hold on Sweetrobin basically hinges on Sansa. If Sansa wanted LF to lose control of the Vale, she very well could make that happen. LF's only play, if the Northern Houses back Jon, is to try and turn Sansa against Jon. And that will take some time to pull off if that turns out to be his play.
This post was edited on 6/23/16 at 6:12 pm
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

His entire hold on Sweetrobin basically hinges on Sansa


Dude, did you not see that sweet arse falcon?
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
16257 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Dude, did you not see that sweet arse falcon?

That was a pretty sweet arse falcon.

But I also saw LF shove Sweetrobin's mom out the moon door with Sansa right there.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

LF won't have a choice if Jon is backed by the other Northern Houses. His entire hold on Sweetrobin basically hinges on Sansa. If Sansa wanted LF to lose control of the Vale, she very well could make that happen. LF's only play, if the Northern Houses back Jon, is to try and turn Sansa against Jon. And that will take some time to pull off if that turns out to be his play.



If he's going to do something like this, then it still doesn't make sense to crown Jon the "King in the North". Bran, Sansa, and Arya (keep in mind that LF knows she's still alive) are ahead of him in the hierarchy. Why not give him Karhold instead, crown Sansa the Queen in the North, and then poison Sansa from there that the Karstarks too were an off branch of House Stark and that Jon is plotting against her. Plus Sansa has had two awful experiences with actual bastards in Joffrey and Ramsay, and she wasn't fond of Jon before this season. Then when rumors spread that Jon is the legitimate son of Rhaegar Targaryen and Lyanna Stark, shite completely hits the fan.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52283 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:20 pm to
Just name Lyanna Mormont queen of the North. She'll get shite done
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

Just name Lyanna Mormont queen of the North. She'll get shite done



Clearly the most qualified.
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
16257 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

crown Sansa the Queen in the North

Who are you saying is going to crown her Queen in the North? LF doesn't have the liege authority to do that. LF won't openly go against the wishes of the Northern houses. He's not just going to openly say "I have the biggest army here, so the Northern houses will bend to my wishes". That's not his way of doing things.

Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52283 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:31 pm to
No one named Robb King of the North.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

Who are you saying is going to crown her Queen in the North? LF doesn't have the liege authority to do that. LF won't openly go against the wishes of the Northern houses. He's not just going to openly say "I have the biggest army here, so the Northern houses will bend to my wishes". That's not his way of doing things.



You're overlooking that Jon is still a bastard, and Sansa is still kicking around. Who is going to legitimize him? I still think the Northern Lords would prefer a legitimate Stark over a bastard. Sansa as Queen could legitimize him, but unless Stannis just comes marching in miraculously alive, I don't see where Jon's going to find a King to legitimize his claim, at least as a Stark. Targaryen is possible, but that also rules him out for being "King in the North".

And while you do have a point of the Northern Lords having the final say, the Vale Lords didn't come up there for a bastard who let in thousands of Wildings. They were there for Sansa.
This post was edited on 6/23/16 at 7:41 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

No one named Robb King of the North.



Robb was legitimate though.
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52283 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:36 pm to
I think Sansa would legitimize him just so he could be king. I don't think she wants that shite.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

I think Sansa would legitimize him just so he could be king. I don't think she wants that shite.



To be fair, neither does Jon.

But I do like this quote from Varys in ADWD about Aegon, but to be honest I think he is unknowingly more describing Jon (save for the Faith and several tongues part):

quote:

Aegon has been shaped for rule before he could walk. He has been trained in arms, as befits a knight to be, but that was not the end of his education. He reads and writes, he speaks several tongues, he has studied history and law and poetry. A septa has instructed him in the mysteries of the Faith since he was old enough to understand them. He has lived with fisherfolk, worked with his hands, swum in rivers and mended nets and learned to wash his own clothes at need. He can fish and cook and bind up a wound, he knows what it is like to be hungry, to be hunted, to be afraid. Tommen has been taught that kingship is his right. Aegon knows kingship is his duty, that a king must put his people first, and live and rule for them.
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
16257 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

You're overlooking that Jon is still a bastard, and Sansa is still kicking around. Who is going to legitimize him? I still think the Northern Lords would prefer a legitimate Stark over a bastard.

I think the Northern Lords would prefer a male old enough to lead the north (especially if they believe the stories of the White Walkers coming), over Sansa (a woman) or even Bran (a kid/teenager); regardless if he is a bastard or not. Heck, he could legitimize himself if the remaining members of House Stark (Sansa, and eventually Bran & Arya) back that decision. The Northern Lords don't give two craps about who some southern king says is a legit Stark or not.
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
34164 posts
Posted on 6/23/16 at 7:43 pm to
I can totally see Sansa being named to rule Winterfell. The way things are going with the whole girl power thing.

I really dont see Jon being named King of the North or Warden of Winterfell. The only way that would happen is if Jon met Dany and Jon asked if he could keep the surname of Stark instead of Targ and to be named Warden in the North.


And I doubt that happens. By the end of the series, there will be nothing bbut women ruling the seven kingdoms, book it.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 124
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 124Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram