Started By
Message

re: Game of Thrones S8 E2 "A Knight of Seven Kingdoms." Official Thread

Posted on 4/20/19 at 4:05 pm to
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 4:05 pm to
I'm ready for some shite to go down.

Everyone has jerked each other off except Jamie and Brann, so hopefully the moments begin to truly unfold in epic scale.

I'm ready for blood
Posted by JimMorrison
The Peninsula
Member since May 2012
20747 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

They think only his father is a Stark but they don’t know who his mother is. For all they know, his mother (again they don’t know she’s the real Stark parent of his) could have had some Valyrian blood.


Everyone thought she was a low born whore. The other families in Westeros with Valyrian ties are all noble.

quote:

why wasn’t she surprised he was actually able to ride the dragon?


This is part of the reason it was anticlimactic. Even if she thought he could ride because she gave permission, doesn't mean he would be able to control Rhaegal like he did.

Tyrion saw Jon and he knows more about dragons than anyone. I'm hoping we see a conversation between him and Jon next episode
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22532 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Everyone thought she was a low born whore. The other families in Westeros with Valyrian ties are all noble.


You missed the part where I said “a bit of” Valyrian blood. The Targaryens had plenty of bastards too. She doesn’t have to be directly related (meaning she doesn’t have to be a direct bastard of a Targaryen either) to have Targaryen blood. Not all the dragonriders were confirmed Targaryen bastards either so they don’t really know for sure if riding a dragon equals Targaryen blood at all.
quote:

Even if she thought he could ride because she gave permission, doesn't mean he would be able to control Rhaegal like he did.
Yeah I thought that was stupid. He could’ve easily have lost his grip or been thrown from it and died.

Again I think it could help the argument that he’s a Targaryen but there has to be something more concrete.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 5:39 pm to
The only hard "evidence" that they have is the book from the Grand Maester stating that he annulled Rhegar's first marriage and married him to Lyanna. Of course that doesn't indicate that they had a child - unless maybe they find another document where the High Maester did their version of christening him or something.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20396 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

The only hard "evidence" that they have is the book from the Grand Maester stating that he annulled Rhegar's first marriage and married him to Lyanna
except that doesn't name Lyanna. Go rewatch the scene, it simply says his marriage was annulled and he married another.
Common knowledge says he had Lyanna, the "abduction".

Bran's visions are what says Lyanna was voluntarily with him, and that she married him, and that she had a child, and the child is Jon.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

Bran's visions are what says Lyanna was voluntarily with him, and that she married him, and that she had a child, and the child is Jon.



That would be a hard sell to anyone who didn't implicitly trust Bran (and, to a degree, Sam). As far as I know the only living person who may have knowledge is Howland Reed. And the show doesn't seem to be to eager to include him.

I guess they could go with him surviving a huge fire or commanding a dragon or something. Or just kind of punt and have people accept it.

It will be interesting to see what route they go.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33939 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Can’t wait. I got a theory going that the white walkers will skip winterfell and frick up kings landing first.


You got that from Reddit. I read that thread, too.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33939 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

You missed the part where I said “a bit of” Valyrian blood.


A Wiki of Ice and Fire has traced the Stark bloodlines back pretty far, and there is no Valyrian blood anywhere to be found. They were pretty focused on marrying into Northern families. Lots of Glovers and Karstarks and Royces, etc.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
12177 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 7:17 pm to
If anyone questions Bran about Jon's lineage Bran can start to tell those in the room when the questioner last masterbated and who they were thinking about.


That should put an end to discussion.

Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33333 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Actually, I think all of us want Sansa and Dani to get it on.


Scissor me timbers!
Posted by JimMorrison
The Peninsula
Member since May 2012
20747 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

1BamaRTR


You're reaching here. There's no way we have enough time to hash out what you're trying to script up.

In the current state, riding a dragon confirms he's Targaryen. That is concrete.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22532 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

A Wiki of Ice and Fire has traced the Stark bloodlines back pretty far, and there is no Valyrian blood anywhere to be found.

I meant his mother. They don’t know who she really was and for all they know, she (again they don’t know she’s a Stark) at some point in her ancestory might have had some relative that was a Targaryen bastard. Again this is from the viewpoint of someone who doesn’t know his true parentage and might be trying to reason out how he’s able to ride a dragon.

Or in Dany’s case, she thinks he can because she allowed him too. Pretty risky and stupid on her part, but that’s probably what she thinks.

Literally my whole point in this is him riding a dragon doesn’t prove he’s a Targaryen to everyone else. That’s all I’m saying.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22532 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

There's no way we have enough time to hash out what you're trying to script up.

I’m not scripting up anything. I’m just saying there’s going to have to be a little more. Could be a combination of Bran and Sam. Again wasn’t enough for Dany.

Also doesn’t prove he’s not a bastard. The whole point of showing his parents getting married was to show he wasn’t a bastard. That he’s an actual Targaryen by name as well. Him being exposed as the true heir to going to come into play.

You’re saying there’s not enough time but with the way they’re rushing everything, they’ll make that little more actual evidence happen.
Posted by MF Doom
I'm only Joshin'
Member since Oct 2008
11712 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 9:01 pm to
So what do y'all thinks the real reason Cersei sent bronn up north?
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
33189 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

The only hard "evidence" that they have is the book from the Grand Maester stating that he annulled Rhegar's first marriage and married him to Lyanna

except that doesn't name Lyanna. Go rewatch the scene, it simply says his marriage was annulled and he married another. 


The scene where Gilly calls him Ragger.
I see what you are saying, but consider that she was reading from a book Sam hadn't transcribed yet. Later, Sam's report to Bran is after he read and transcribed that same book.
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
33189 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

So what do y'all thinks the real reason Cersei sent bronn up north


I don't think it's as big a mystery as everyone thinks...Bronn is not loyal to J&T, but is friends with them. He is also a respected blade amongst the Lannister soldiers (after Blackwater and the the Loot Train debacle.) His influence among them could be bad for her.

Cersei wants him out of KL. In her mind, she is gonna kill whatever the NK doesn't regarding Dany's army anyway, so they are all walking dead already. Adding Bronn to that group is a safer option for her and she knows paying him up front for a job he won't do all but guarantees his departure.
This post was edited on 4/20/19 at 9:23 pm
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20396 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

quote:

The only hard "evidence" that they have is the book from the Grand Maester stating that he annulled Rhegar's first marriage and married him to Lyanna

except that doesn't name Lyanna. Go rewatch the scene, it simply says his marriage was annulled and he married another. 



The scene where Gilly calls him Ragger.
I see what you are saying, but consider that she was reading from a book Sam hadn't transcribed yet. Later, Sam's report to Bran is after he read and transcribed that same book.

And reading that didn't clue Sam in, it was only after Bran said Jon was "Sand", the bastard of Rhaegar and Lyanna born in Dorne.
Bran was certain that was his lineage, and thus his name.

Sam then said whoa wait up, Rhaegar was annulled and remarried. I read that in the maester's personal diary. Hey Bran, can you check and see if Rhaegar married Lyanna?
And that's when Bran went and found the marriage, and saw it. I'd say confirmed it, but it really only confirms it for Bran.
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
33189 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Sam then said whoa wait up, 


"...he annulled Rhaegar's marriage to Elia. He wed Rhaegar and Lyanna in a secret ceremony. Is this something you can 'see'?"

ETA: I still hold out hope that the "old friend" is Howland Reed.

This post was edited on 4/20/19 at 10:21 pm
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20396 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

"...he annulled Rhaegar's marriage to Elia. He wed Rhaegar and Lyanna in a secret ceremony. Is this something you can 'see'?"


Again, go rewatch the scenes in question.

Sam knew Rhaegar had former marriage annulled, and was secretly wed at the same time.

Bran knew that Jon was Rhaegar and Lyanna's child, and that they loved each other.

Neither knew the other angle, until they discussed it.

Bran said Jon's last name should be Sand, since he was born in Dorne, and that's the Dornish name for bastards. Because at that point, Bran assumed Rhaegar was still married to Elia, and thus Jon was his bastard son.
Sam then chimed in and said, no, he wasn't married to Elia. I have a record saying his marriage was annulled and he secretly married another.
AND THEN, they deduced what that meant, and Sam said it aloud. That's why said asked if he could see that, it was something they both just figured out. If Sam KNEW it was Rhaegar and Lyanna, he wouldn't need Bran to see to confirm it.
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
33189 posts
Posted on 4/20/19 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

White walkers


Bad Lip Reading GoT

An oldie, but still the best GoT parody I've seen.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 67
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 67Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram