Started By
Message

re: Favorite LOTR Character

Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:28 pm to
Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
32121 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:28 pm to
Boromir, Legolas, Gandalf, and Aragorn are good options, but my pick is Samwise. Dude is completely friendly and loyal to Frodo and everyone else throughout the entire trilogy.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
43050 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:47 pm to
Book or movie? Because they do differ somewhat.

Frodo bears more of a burden then shown in movies. Sam, despite being steadfast and all, does waver more when it's his turn to give up the ring. Same with Galadriel.

Gimli's more of a badass, less 'comic relief', but his friendship with Legolas is more authentic.

Elves are pretty elitist, tbh, and for good reason. But they can also be cool.

Really so hard to pick ONE, but Faramir does has my favorite quote.

“I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.”
Posted by bluestem75
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2007
4934 posts
Posted on 4/30/25 at 6:50 pm to
Posted by rileytiger
Surfing The Gulf of America
Member since Feb 2007
4092 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:45 am to
Golem - He is the bridge between good and evil I guess. Constantly fighting with his addiction. I still always say "Potatoes Precious" if having them for dinner.
Posted by rileytiger
Surfing The Gulf of America
Member since Feb 2007
4092 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 8:51 am to
quote:

The Witch King of Angmar

Sauron and Saruman were bitches who didn't get their hands dirty and fight!


Sauron could not fight, because he was not fully formed without the ring. If he did there would have been a big can of whipass pulled out!
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10322 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 11:00 am to
quote:

I cannot understand anyone liking Boromir. I honestly think people say this to be edgy. Dude was a total POS.


You're being too hard on Boromir. He was a man who had spent his entire life fighting against the Shadow from up close. He knew the power of Mordor firsthand, and as the heir to the Stewardship of Gondor he also knew that the strength of Gondor was failing. They had already lost their capital city to Sauron and it was only a matter of time before Minas Tirith was itself attacked. When he found out at the Council of Elrond that the One Ring had been found, he immediately focused on it as the sole hope for defeating Sauron and saving Gondor - not by destroying it, of course, but by using it. To his mind, for the Ring to fall into his hands just at the moment when Gondor seemed on the edge of collapse was a miracle. And of course it would fall into his hands, because it had belonged to Isildur, but as the line of Gondorian kings had died out long ago, who else other than the Steward of Gondor could really lay legitimate claim to the Ring now?

So imagine that you are Boromir. You've arrived at the Council of Elrond to find it mostly consisting of Dwarves, Elves, and... Hobbits? What's a Hobbit? Regardless, in all the years that you have spent wielding a sword and battling the armies of Mordor first hand, you've never seen any of these other so-called allies so much as lift a finger to help out, despite the fact that the only reason they aren't living under Sauron's yoke right now is the desperate defense that Gondor has been carrying out alone and unaided. But - what's this? Wonder of wonders! It turns out that these Hobbits are here because they have actually by some incredible turn of events come into possession of the One Ring! The only weapon in Middle-Earth that could conceivably give Gondor the power to defeat Mordor arrives just when you need it most! But then, rather than turn the Ring over to its rightful owner to let him go, you know, defeat the ancient enemy that threatens them all with immediate doom, they instead decide to leave it in the possession of this Hobbit with instructions to carry it into Sauron's back yard and drop it into his personal smelting pit! What are these fools thinking??? One does not simply walk into Mordor!!!!!! They are going to screw up their one shot at victory and ensure Gondor's defeat and destruction! And then, as if all of that were not enough, they tell you, "Oh, and by the way, see this scruffy-looking dude over here who, again, has been nowhere to be found while you were leading Gondorian armies against the forces of the Shadow? Well, he's actually your king, so he's going to need you to swear allegiance to him, and also that means that your family's position as Stewards of Gondor probably won't exist now. Ok, great! Off to Mordor to most probably give Sauron his Ring back!"
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86531 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 11:08 am to
quote:

You're being too hard on Boromir.
All I know is what was shown in the movie. His only redeeming moment came at death. What was shown was a terrible person.
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10322 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 11:25 am to
Again, even with only what's presented to us in the movie, I still think you're being too hard on him. Boromir's failing was being a normal man. His intentions were noble - he did not want the Ring for his own power, but in order to save Gondor - but the Ring was able to use that to ensnare him. And remember that the Ring is presented as being at least semi-sentient, so it knew that in the Fellowship it was being carried by a collection of individuals all of whom agreed with the decision that had been made to try and destroy it, with one sole exception. It would make sense that the Ring would have worked extra hard to try and get Boromir to seize it.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86531 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Again, even with only what's presented to us in the movie, I still think you're being too hard on him
Look, I am not trying to make anyone dislike him. I will not argue that point with anyone. OTOH, I do not find any of these arguments convincing, for me. I think he was a terrible person. If you don't, that fine with me. I mean, even in the scene with the sword shards he comes off as a total arse.
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10322 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 11:38 am to
No big deal, in the end we are talking about made-up characters in a make-believe world, after all.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86531 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 11:40 am to
Posted by The Godfather
Surrounded by Assholes
Member since Mar 2005
42456 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 11:58 am to
quote:

No big deal, in the end we are talking about made-up characters in a make-believe world, after all.




Even still...terrible person is a bit harsh
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63371 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 12:04 pm to
Gandalf.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
53584 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

No big deal, in the end we are talking about made-up characters in a make-believe world, after all.

Don’t sell us short. That’s what this board is all about.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
53584 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 12:36 pm to
Book? Frodo, who was very funny at times, and nowhere near the sad sap he was in the films.

Movies? Gandalf, without a doubt, but that probably has more to do with Ian McKellen.

An honorable mention: Peter Jackson and Viggo really brought Aragorn to life in the movies. He was, to me, a very boring, almost layer-less character in the book, but became a complex driver of the narrative in the movies. Astin really did the same for Sam.
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10322 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

An honorable mention: Peter Jackson and Viggo really brought Aragorn to life in the movies. He was, to me, a very boring, almost layer-less character in the book, but became a complex driver of the narrative in the movies.


See, that's interesting because I did not particularly care for Mortensen's take on Aragorn, although I respect the hell out of his commitment to the role. I just didn't feel like he conveyed the necessary combination of overweening charisma/deep wisdom/general badassery that Aragorn calls for. I will admit that on subsequent watches he has grown on me a bit, though.

I will say that in the books I love the character when he is first introduced and is still called Strider, but once he reveals himself as Isildur's Heir and starts being called Aragorn he paradoxically also becomes much less central to the plot, and therefore necessarily less interesting.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
53584 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 12:59 pm to
All of that is fair. Viggo Aragorn added a hesitance—an apprehensiveness to take the lead—to the character that book Aragorn never really shows. Book Aragorn already has his sword and has KING ME vibes all the way. I’ll admit that Jackson’s interpretation of the character was a big departure from the source, but damn, it worked for me.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86531 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

terrible person is a bit harsh
yet completely accurate
Posted by The Godfather
Surrounded by Assholes
Member since Mar 2005
42456 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

yet completely accurate




Agree to strongly disagree
Posted by Locoguan0
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2017
7089 posts
Posted on 5/1/25 at 1:41 pm to
Book Aragorn... The books didn't have all of this "I don't want to be Isildur" crap. Aragorn lived his entire life in preparation to take the throne. He left Imladris with The Sword that was Broken in hand, ready to kick arse.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram