- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Emily Wilson claims Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey is too woke...
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:51 pm to Little Wooden Box
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:51 pm to Little Wooden Box
quote:
You should read the 10/10 reviews. None of them seen movie and it’s a masterpiece
So we agree that metacritic is useless.
Great.
3
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:54 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
So we agree that reviews are useless
The majority of everyone that saw it said it’s meh. Looks like we were right.
Metacritic is 5.2
Rotten tomatoes is 54%
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:56 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
So we agree that metacritic is useless.
Its very useful for gathering the trolls and making them waste their time thinking people actually use metacritic for movie reviews.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:57 pm to Little Wooden Box
quote:Are your collection of alters now using the “we” pronoun? Didn’t know you were part of the alphabet crew as you call it. Makes since considering you say they’re mentally ill and that definitely defines you.
Looks like we were right.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:58 pm to Little Wooden Box
quote:
The majority of everyone that saw it said it’s meh. Looks like we were right.
No
Even on Metacritic the majority of reviews are above average.
However the site is clearly useless when the distribution is such that it is either entirely positive (46%) or negative (44%) When there is no middle ground you know that its clearly being bombarded on both sides.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:18 pm to Adam Banks
Metacitic is by far the most accurate for audience score.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:22 pm to Madking
quote:
Metacitic is by far the most accurate for audience score.
They literally have people reviewing the movie stating that they have not and will not see it. Seems that would essentially disqualify it no?
If you can find similar posts on other review sites I’d be happy to see them.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:24 pm to Adam Banks
You mean the sites who curate and pay for positive reviews?
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:25 pm to Madking
quote:
Metacitic is by far the most accurate for audience score.
Translation: the site that allows for unverified reviews and has obviously been reviewed bombed is the most accurate because it fits my agenda
Nevermind any other metric like RT, CinemaScore, or IMDb they have the movie rated highly so clearly that can't be true
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:25 pm to Adam Banks
It’s quite the spectacle that they’ll use unverified reviews from metacritic and the unverified reviews from RT to make their argument, then turn right around and state that the verified ticket purchase data from RT is invalid because buying a ticket doesn’t mean they watched the movie. All that with a straight face. 
I have serious doubts some of these guys made it past 7th grade.
I have serious doubts some of these guys made it past 7th grade.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:27 pm to Madking
Do they have people proudly admitting to reviewing a movie they haven’t seen?
That’s a pretty low bar to cross for a site to ensure people who are reviewing the movie to simply view the movie.
That’s a pretty low bar to cross for a site to ensure people who are reviewing the movie to simply view the movie.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:28 pm to Madking
quote:No way.
Metacitic is by far the most accurate for audience score.
You literally have reviews stating it’s the greatest movie ever, I will never ever watch this movie, this movie is literally the downfall of western civilization - and they all count equally to reach the score.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:28 pm to Adam Banks
Well here’s the site, I don’t see anything you’re claiming as usual but people can look and decide if there are any and if they’re enough to effect the score assuming they exist.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:30 pm to NighthawkDawg
This is another proven false pattern with your kind. Any publication that doesn’t fit your narrative is deemed faulty.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:35 pm to Madking
quote:
Well here’s the site, I don’t see anything you’re claiming as usual
Looks like metacritic is bought off and censoring reviews then
They deleted the review that I quoted in my post because it was the top post in the link I provided at the time.
Who knows if it is still affecting the score
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:35 pm to Madking
Literally the first review that pops up calls the movie the downfall of western civilization and other reviews say they refuse to watch it.
Good God man at least look at what you're posting
Good God man at least look at what you're posting
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:35 pm to Madking
quote:I can verify the reviews he posted prior to him posting. I was on the site after CP3’s alt kept repeating the score, checked out about 10 reviews and they were all within that first 10. I wasn’t going to read more seeing as how they easily are not vetted and no criteria exists to basically post whatever you want, outside of a report button.
I don’t see anything you’re claiming as usual but people can look and decide if there are any and if they’re enough to effect the score assuming they exist.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:36 pm to NighthawkDawg
So just move the goal post and again your logic failure in this argument is undeniable.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:37 pm to drizztiger
Ok so then is it enough to disqualify the site and why do the others get a pass when we know they’re engineering scores?
Btw only example given was a different argument than was presented. By night dawn or whatever his name is of course
Btw only example given was a different argument than was presented. By night dawn or whatever his name is of course
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:38 pm to drizztiger
Also notice how anytime they reply about a review site it's only RT? Nothing about CinemaScore who's job it is to ask people fresh out of the movie theater how they felt about the movie
This post was edited on 7/23/26 at 5:38 pm
Page 7 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News