- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/7/17 at 7:53 pm to Tactical1
No surprise Emma Watson is a terrible actress
Posted on 3/7/17 at 7:55 pm to SabiDojo
Yeah, I hope that reviewer gets arse cancer and dies
Posted on 3/7/17 at 7:59 pm to Civildawg
quote:
Is it just me or does the cgi beast look terrible?
It's not just you. The trailer was bad in general anyway.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 7:59 pm to Carson123987
I've been pretty underwhelmed by the trailers. The CGI looks very bad.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 7:59 pm to Carson123987
There was another who did that:
So no matter how good the movie was, he wasn't going to like it. Just the concept makes him not like it. And this clown works for Forbes.
quote:
I'd like to think we've advanced beyond the whole "that mean/scary dude is really a sweetheart once you get to know him" trope.
So no matter how good the movie was, he wasn't going to like it. Just the concept makes him not like it. And this clown works for Forbes.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:06 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
Timing is everything. A quarter century has passed since we saw Disney’s Belle fall for the Beast; today, the message that behind every rough man is a charming prince (sorry, Emma) is regressive, if not lethal."
I mean c'mon. How can someone be that annoying and live?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:09 pm to Carson123987
quote:
Good. I'd hate for live action Disney remakes to become the next comic book movies where we have 10 a year.
It's going to make enough money to justify more live action remakes.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:42 pm to SabiDojo
You would be the one to find that review 
Posted on 3/7/17 at 8:50 pm to jeff5891
That is def my kind of comment but I didn't find that one. 
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:02 pm to DanglingFury
quote:
Timing is everything. A quarter century has passed since we saw Disney’s Belle fall for the Beast; today, the message that behind every rough man is a charming prince (sorry, Emma) is regressive, if not lethal."
I busted out lol'ing reading that shite. Unreal.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:10 pm to Tactical1
One of my wife's coworkers went to the premier. Her brother works for Disney and his job during the premier was to keep some VIPs out of sight during the red carpet walk and then sneak them into the back row, so she and her mom got to attend.
She said the Beast was great but the movie was just okay overall. She said there were some scary parts, but it seemed appropriate for small children. Did not mention the gay stuff, which for this lady probably means there's nothing to them. Still, that negative publicity coupled with bad reviews might make this something of a disappointment for Disney.
She said the Beast was great but the movie was just okay overall. She said there were some scary parts, but it seemed appropriate for small children. Did not mention the gay stuff, which for this lady probably means there's nothing to them. Still, that negative publicity coupled with bad reviews might make this something of a disappointment for Disney.
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 3/7/17 at 11:14 pm to DanglingFury
quote:
Timing is everything. A quarter century has passed since we saw Disney’s Belle fall for the Beast; today, the message that behind every rough man is a charming prince (sorry, Emma) is regressive, if not lethal."
The story I remember is that the Beast fell for Belle. Belle was an all around genuine person. This critic is retarded.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 11:16 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
She said there were some scary parts, but it seemed appropriate for small children
Great insight
Posted on 3/9/17 at 8:01 am to 13SaintTiger
quote:
Great insight
The wolves were really "scary," but for the most part that element is in 1 or 2 scenes and it probably wouldn't be too scary for my 3-year old. Better?
ETA: I assumed your comment was sarcasm. In the off-chance that it wasn't, I am being nice with my reply.
This post was edited on 3/9/17 at 8:04 am
Posted on 3/10/17 at 8:50 pm to imjustafatkid
Down to 68%, 6 of the last 10 reviews were rotten. Main complaint seems to be that Belle was miscast, Emma is too plain and emotionless.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:09 pm to GEAUXmedic
quote:
Down to 68%, 6 of the last 10 reviews were rotten. Main complaint seems to be that Belle was miscast, Emma is too plain and emotionless.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:12 pm to Tactical1
Not a good movie..... at all
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:51 pm to Burt Reynolds
Cgi beast looks bad and Emma Watson doesn't hit the belle I would've imagined.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 10:32 pm to jimjackandjose
They should have gotten Anne Hathaway.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News