- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice Official Trailer
Posted on 4/17/15 at 10:52 am to RollTide1987
Posted on 4/17/15 at 10:52 am to RollTide1987
My two cents:
Zack Snyder is a trailer-making genius. I can't think of a movie he directed where the trailer wasn't awesome. The hype his trailers creates are justifiable when they come out, but often people seem underwhelmed and disappointed after watching the actual movie. This is a major flaw of his.
I may be in the minority of those who loved MoS, but I think the events that happened in that movie set up nicely for a Batman vs. Superman showdown. Batman believes someone should answer for the destruction of Metropolis, so he plots a way to make that possible. Given that there was Kryptonian wreckage scattered across the globe, it is not far-fetched to assume Bruce Wayne has gotten his hands on some sort of kryptonite. Plus Superman and Zod destroyed his satellite, so he's probably pissed about that.
It's cool to see they're using Chicago as the setting for Gotham again.
Zack Snyder is a trailer-making genius. I can't think of a movie he directed where the trailer wasn't awesome. The hype his trailers creates are justifiable when they come out, but often people seem underwhelmed and disappointed after watching the actual movie. This is a major flaw of his.
I may be in the minority of those who loved MoS, but I think the events that happened in that movie set up nicely for a Batman vs. Superman showdown. Batman believes someone should answer for the destruction of Metropolis, so he plots a way to make that possible. Given that there was Kryptonian wreckage scattered across the globe, it is not far-fetched to assume Bruce Wayne has gotten his hands on some sort of kryptonite. Plus Superman and Zod destroyed his satellite, so he's probably pissed about that.
It's cool to see they're using Chicago as the setting for Gotham again.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 11:02 am to Bluefin
quote:
Zack Snyder is a trailer-making genius. I can't think of a movie he directed where the trailer wasn't awesome. The hype his trailers creates are justifiable when they come out, but often people seem underwhelmed and disappointed after watching the actual movie. This is a major flaw of his.
Yes it is. See the link to the Sucker Punch trailer I posted earlier in the thread.
On a related note, no one ever mentions my 2nd favorite Zack Snyder movie (after 300).
Legend of the Guardians - Trailer
If you have this on Blu-Ray it is a damn near "reference quality" disc to use when setting up your tv/blu ray player.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 11:05 am to Bluefin
quote:
Given that there was Kryptonian wreckage scattered across the globe, it is not far-fetched to assume Bruce Wayne has gotten his hands on some sort of kryptonite.
I'm interested to see if kryptonite appears in the movie and how its introduced. Does Luthor or Wayne discover it? How do they find it? How do they test it?
Posted on 4/17/15 at 11:14 am to Bluefin
quote:Absolutely. SuckerPunch and 300 come to mind.
Zack Snyder is a trailer-making genius. I can't think of a movie he directed where the trailer wasn't awesome. The hype his trailers creates are justifiable when they come out, but often people seem underwhelmed and disappointed after watching the actual movie. This is a major flaw of his.
quote:I enjoyed it as well. There were some flaws in it (first being David Goyer sucks with his character lines "You're a monster, Zod, and I'm gonna stop you." “I grew up in Kansas, General. I’m about as American as it gets.” Corny AF), but overall I'd probably give it a 7.5/10.
I may be in the minority of those who loved MoS
quote:I could be wrong but I believe they said that there will by no kryptonite in this world.
Bruce Wayne has gotten his hands on some sort of kryptonite.
I am excited that Affleck brought in Oscar winning screenplay writer Chris Terrio (Argo) to help with the movie.
This post was edited on 4/17/15 at 11:17 am
Posted on 4/17/15 at 11:27 am to Bluefin
quote:
I may be in the minority of those who loved MoS, but I think the events that happened in that movie set up nicely for a Batman vs. Superman showdown. Batman believes someone should answer for the destruction of Metropolis, so he plots a way to make that possible
100% agree.
I also really liked MOS and thought a lot of the criticism was unwarranted. It definitely seems like Superman's recklessness in MOS - which is the major criticism of the film - was a major set up to the franchise.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 11:34 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
I also really liked MOS and thought a lot of the criticism was unwarranted. It definitely seems like Superman's recklessness in MOS - which is the major criticism of the film - was a major set up to the franchise.
The general public and some fan-boys expected Superman to come out of the gate as the mature moral figure they are used to. It takes time, he has a development arc like any other character. It also breathes some life into a character that can sometimes be seen as monotone.
Its going to be great when Batman and Superman join forces and Superman fully develops.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 11:34 am to RollTide1987
I just watched the trailer and will someone tell me what doesn't look badass about it?
I thought it was fricking awesome.
I thought it was fricking awesome.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 11:36 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
It definitely seems like Superman's recklessness in MOS - which is the major criticism of the film - was a major set up to the franchise.
And that's cool if that's the case. It just would've been nice to see that mentioned at the end of MoS instead of having Stamper wave around his courtside tickets as if nothing had happened.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 11:43 am to FairhopeTider
quote:
It just would've been nice to see that mentioned at the end of MoS instead of having Stamper wave around his courtside tickets as if nothing had happened.
When you're trying to get laid, you gotta ignore reality.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:26 pm to Bluefin
quote:
When you're trying to get laid, you gotta ignore reality.
"We can grab dinner after the game. I know of a nice bistro that's in between the corpse disposal center and the still smoldering embers of the Metropolis Bank tower."
This post was edited on 4/17/15 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:36 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Why is the movie called this? Are they seriously going to fight each other? Because if they do then Superman will win in about 5 seconds if it's at all realistic in the comic book sense.
Stop
Posting
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:47 pm to danfraz
quote:
if it's at all realistic in the comic book sense
This might be one of my favorite quotes on TD.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:48 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Meanwhile Luthor has some sort of scheme (which could ivolve another villain) that is going on behind the scenes. Batman and Superman fight, realize the threat, realize they are on the same side, and then join forces to stop it.
Really stepping out on a ledge with this prediction
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 4/17/15 at 12:58 pm to schexyoung
quote:
The general public and some fan-boys expected Superman to come out of the gate as the mature moral figure they are used to. It takes time, he has a development arc like any other character.
To be fair, the purity of Superman was that he WAS initially a moral and just figure. There was no period of adjustment. He didn't need to "develop," in that sense, that's what made Superman, Superman. Making him more conflicted and and error prone or lacking conviction takes away that core ideal.
From a character development perspective, that's a HUGE shift. It almost completely changes the identity of the character. It actually makes Superman more like other heroes than it does make him a paragon of truth and justice...and... (Yes, it's closer to later versions of CB Superman, that is true. That doesn't mean it's familiar territory.)...
quote:
It also breathes some life into a character that can sometimes be seen as monotone.
As a side note, I really, really hate this sentiment. As a pretty big fan of more than a few "straight laced to a fault" characters, it's kind of depressing to see that true moral conviction is seen as monotone and boring. Or that you can't have a good story, or an arc, with someone who always does the right thing.
Instead of being unique, he's like everybody else, I think that's, subconsciously, part of what those folks are saying.
This post was edited on 4/17/15 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 4/17/15 at 1:06 pm to RollTide1987
Real talk as someone who loves these two characters more than pretty much anybody. Meh.
And that quote they ended on was kind of goofy.
And that quote they ended on was kind of goofy.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 1:17 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
As a side note, I really, really hate this sentiment. As a pretty big fan of more than a few "straight laced to a fault" characters, it's kind of depressing to see that true moral conviction is seen as monotone and boring. Or that you can't have a good story, or an arc, with someone who always does the right thing.
Instead of being unique, he's like everybody else, I think that's, subconsciously, part of what those folks are saying.
As originally conceived, Superman is the single most boring character in comics. He has/had no depth of character. He was a shining paragon of goodness and morality and truth and justice and the American way, which played well during the late 30s and early 40s to kids who were excited about escaping reality and fighting Hitler.
As the fanbase matured somewhat, or as the writers tried for a broader fanbase anyway, they realized they need to give this character more definition. Enter the love interest, enter the loneliness, enter the family history. Even the writers recognized that a hero without flaws is a boring hero, particularly when that hero is nigh-unkillable. The drama sinks, the reader's ability to identify with the character sinks, and it becomes a monotonous slog through a boring punch after a boring kick to thugs who stand no chance against him. That's why the psychology of Superman is the single most interesting facet of the character. Everyone has felt loneliness. Everyone has felt the pain of loss. Not everyone can do something about it. Not everyone has to reconcile the desire for revenge with the desire to live up to your father's standards. This stuff is compelling.
Which brings me to MoS, which is one of the worst superhero movies in the recent slew of superhero movies (admittedly better than any other Superman movie), directed by a man who is almost entirely incapable of presenting his grand visions in a coherent, well thought out, intelligent manner on screen. Snyder is all flash and no substance. The only movie of his worth a shite is Watchmen and he damn near blew that. He took the comic of 300 and made it into a 2 hour slow-motion catastrophe of a movie. I had no idea movies with so much action could be so boring, but it is precisely that reason that they are boring. He is Michael Bay with a more artistic palette. That's it.
I will not pay to see this shite. I have been duped too many times by this shyster to not feel shame.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 1:23 pm to LoveThatMoney
quote:
I will not pay to see this shite. I have been duped too many times by this shyster to not feel shame.
Its just a movie, dude. You are being way to dramatic about this.
Posted on 4/17/15 at 1:27 pm to LoveThatMoney
quote:
As originally conceived, Superman is the single most boring character in comics. He has/had no depth of character.
I don't disagree, because...
quote:
Even the writers recognized that a hero without flaws is a boring hero, particularly when that hero is nigh-unkillable.
This. It was pretty tough to write a good character who both always did the right thing AND was basically unkillable and able to do whatever he wanted. That's kind of always been the tension with Superman, and that's what plays out here: The IDEAL of Superman is where he gets his identity, but that idea is built upon a problematic base of true moral conviction and ultra-level power. Put simply: He has the capability to ALWAYS do the right thing....
quote:
The drama sinks, the reader's ability to identify with the character sinks, and it becomes a monotonous slog through a boring punch after a boring kick to thugs who stand no chance against him. That's why the psychology of Superman is the single most interesting facet of the character. Everyone has felt loneliness. Everyone has felt the pain of loss. Not everyone can do something about it. Not everyone has to reconcile the desire for revenge with the desire to live up to your father's standards. This stuff is compelling.
Agree, again, to an extent. The thing is that pain and loss, two things referenced, in general don't have anything to do with "doing the right thing," (although situations in this category clearly have those kinds of outcomes).
Can a reader not identify with a character who might suffer pain and loss, but ALWAYS does the right thing? That's really the question. The answer, to those in the "good is boring," camp would say No. They can't.
I never said this is what I thought, just what I think people going through this kind of reaction are thinking. And I get this from what I think the reaction to "moral purity is boring," sway in culture.
This post was edited on 4/17/15 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 4/17/15 at 1:28 pm to SaintEB
quote:
Its just a movie, dude. You are being way to dramatic about this.
Sweet comment. No shite it's just a movie. The frick does that matter? We have an entire fricking message board dedicated to TV and Movies. It's all make believe bullshite, though, so having this message board at all means we are all being way too dramatic about all movies.
I mean, what the frick.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)