Started By
Message

re: Yulman Stadium Capacity-24,000

Posted on 6/13/14 at 5:05 pm to
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6378 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 5:05 pm to
a. I don't need to prove anything; b. it's low compared to about every other stadium that has been built from scratch and many other facilities projects that are usually 100% bonded out, guaranteed by future revenues. c. You're right, I don't believe it's a strain. It easily pays for itself, paid primarily through donated money, secondarily through suites and seat sales that require 2K donations, although it obviously infuriates you that it does. And even if there was zero donations, it wouldn't be a strain.
This post was edited on 6/13/14 at 5:09 pm
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43957 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

I still think if tulane ever hosts another powerhouse, it has to be in the Dome. p5 programs won't agree to play there


Its first game is against Georgia Tech (ACC team). Will LSU, Bama, A&M ever play in the stadium no, but I bet State, OM, TCU, Baylor or some other school like that would. Especially if Toolame could become a 7-10 win teams year in and year out.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22784 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

a. I don't need to prove anything


Wasn't asking for you to prove anything, just want to know where you are getting your information.

quote:

b. it's low compared to about every other stadium that has been built from scratch and many other facilities projects that are usually 100% bonded out, guaranteed by future revenues.


Thanks for bringing some figures and specific examples to back this up.

quote:

It easily pays for itself, paid primarily through donated money, secondarily through suites and seat sales that require 2K donations, although it obviously infuriates you that it does


Calm down guy, I'm not infuriated. To me, there looks to be at the minimum of a $25M deficit. If its not collected, it is already paid for with borrowed money, which will therefore need to be paid back. That's all I am trying to say. And since there is a shortfall, thats nearly $50M in borrowed funds, at an interest rate of nearly 4% that has not been paid back before they even play a game.


quote:

And even if there was zero donations, it wouldn't be a strain.


Right, a 24k seat stadium that costs $75M, that houses an historically shitty football team, won't be a financial strain, because its got some suites that require $2k donations. I was giving you the benefit of assuming you might know what you are talking about, but that statement is ridiculous.

And I hate to break it to you, but all those revenues will have to cover operating expenses as well. Its not like they just built this cash cow on campus that is nothing but profit rolling in.

Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6378 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

Right, a 24k seat stadium that costs $75M, that houses an historically shitty football team, won't be a financial strain, because its got some suites that require $2k donations. I was giving you the benefit of assuming you might know what you are talking about, but that statement is ridiculous.

And I hate to break it to you, but all those revenues will have to cover operating expenses as well. Its not like they just built this cash cow on campus that is nothing but profit rolling in.

The net debt service as of over a year ago is 25-30 Million, not 70 million. the 2K SEATS (not suites - those are 25-50K) are sold out with 5 year commitments; there are others with 1500, 1000 and 500 5-year commitments and they will be sold out or close to it. The University has a billion dollar endowment. Football team crappy because of lack of admin support - stadium changes that.
Compare that to dozens of other projects in college football; ULL just financed, what, $30 mill of projects via bank loans, and their ticket revenue was $2.5 mill last year and their endowment is a little short of a billion. And you know what - that won't be a strain for them.
This post was edited on 6/13/14 at 6:26 pm
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22784 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

The 40-50 Million was collected/pledged over a year ago.


Big difference between pledged and collected.

I'm sure a project that went 50% over budget is no biggie. Its not like they thought about the investment cost when comparing to potential revenues.

quote:

Indeed, 25 million is no strain at all with a billion dollar endowment.


Yeah, go ahead and sell some of those restricted assets to cover that cost. Its all just money right?

quote:

But beyond some basics, schools bond out their projects, usually on the come with future revenues.


You do understand this is exactly what Tulane did, right? I mean you have said as much in previous posts. They have spent money they borrowed which they are hoping to pay back with future collections on pledges.

quote:

Their ticket sales were 2.5 mill last year even with their 20K attendance. Run those numbers.


Can you run them for me? I'm not sure what you are getting at.

Look, for the last time, I believe there will be a deficit between pledges received and the cost of the project, the remainder is made up of debt. You initially said there would be no debt service, I was simply arguing that there will indeed be debt service, based upon what we know now.

The project also went over budget. This means more than expected borrowed cash will need to be used for the stadium. Just bc Tulane has a $1B endowment does not mean they don't have other debts and are just swimming in cash. I take it that you know about the other major projects going on uptown and the failing hospital system.

I live a half mile from the stadium; I think it is great that Tulane is going in this direction to make progress for their football program. I have no quarrels with their decision to build, and it really barely effects my life at all.

Also, just because you have a T next to your name does not mean you are the only one with any knowledge of the University.

One last thing, you gonna be sitting in those $50k skyboxes?



Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22784 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 6:38 pm to
changed up your post quite a bit.

quote:

Football team crappy because of lack of admin support - stadium changes that.


I suppose we will see.
Posted by Victor
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2014
11 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 6:45 pm to
We would do a one year in Tiger Stadium and a return in the Superdome since our home stadium is to small for the expected LSU and Tulane fans only when we enter the top 25 teams in the nation in the next 2 to 3 years. We need and want to be competitive before we play LSU.
Posted by wizziko
New Jersey Nets Fan
Member since Jan 2006
35881 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

Yeah bc the uptown hs that would play there suck...

No it had more to do with the neighbors initially complaining about non-Tulane events being held there and "strangers" wandering their neighborhood
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22784 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

No it had more to do with the neighbors initially complaining about non-Tulane events being held there and "strangers" wandering their neighborhood


When did this change?
Posted by NorthshoreTiger76
Pelicans, Saints, & LSU Fan
Member since May 2009
83546 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

No it had more to do with the neighbors initially complaining about non-Tulane events being held there and "strangers" wandering their neighborhood


NIMBY's won't complain if Brother Martin plays Jesuit there
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53795 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 8:09 pm to
The catholic league will remain at gormley even if their fans demand to play at tulane...
Posted by guttata
prairieville
Member since Feb 2006
22631 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 8:30 pm to
It's going to be a nice stadium for the high school soccer finals
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53795 posts
Posted on 6/13/14 at 8:34 pm to
I thought the field wasn't wide enough... Hence no M L S
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61313 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

I still think if tulane ever hosts another powerhouse, it has to be in the Dome. p5 programs won't agree to play there


they already have two games w/Georgia Tech, one w/Duke, and one w/Wake Forest set up for Yulman.
This post was edited on 6/14/14 at 4:40 pm
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53795 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 5:24 pm to
Bc when i think of the big boys i think of duke and wake forest....
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61313 posts
Posted on 6/14/14 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Bc when i think of the big boys i think of duke and wake forest....


Who gives a shite what you think about their programs?

Like it or not, they are P5 teams which means you were flat wrong about saying they would not agree to play there.
Posted by Victor
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2014
11 posts
Posted on 9/5/14 at 10:23 pm to
Big difference between pledged and collected? I think not! When you have the former owner of Serta Mattress Richard Yulman,Tom Benson and his wife now on the Tulane board,Saints and Pelican owner, and the Glazers that own the Bucs and Manchester United pledge to Tulane, it is in the bank!
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram