- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:08 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
You know, people make this argument all the time, yet not a single one has come here to explain why Wisconsin should be eligible but not a 1-loss Auburn team.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:16 pm to lsumatt
because wisconsin won their conference... if you lose the last game and still get in than what's the point?
it should matter when you lose. oklahoma absolutely should not have gotten in in 2003, nor should have nebraska in 2001. LSU at least won their last game in 2007
it should matter when you lose. oklahoma absolutely should not have gotten in in 2003, nor should have nebraska in 2001. LSU at least won their last game in 2007
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:19 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
because wisconsin won their conference... if you lose the last game and still get in than what's the point?
Did Michigan State and Ohio State win their conference? Because the Big 10 said they did. So they should all be eligible because the Big10 makes a rule saying 30% of our conference is a Big10 champ, but the SEC's best team isn't?
Would you be okay with it, if the SEC said, the winner of the SECCG goes to the Sugar, but the team with the higher BCS ranking is "our champion"
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:20 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
because wisconsin won their conference
so did 2 other teams. If Auburn loses to USCe, they will still have the best record in the SEC all by themselves, Wisconsin can not say that.
quote:
it should matter when you lose
why? I hate that mentality. A loss is a loss. Wisconsin still lost a conference game, that would be the same as AU if AU loses Saturday, the difference would be no one can match AU, when Wisky lost, others could have had a better record.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:34 pm to LSUMafia
quote:
You mean like Kansas in 2007?
Their SOS was a jeauke, but if they'd played a legitimate schedule they would have had a good case.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:35 pm to lsumatt
Ohio State was Big Ten co-champs in 2002.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:43 pm to JoLeUGA
quote:Little bit different situation
I don't wanna hear it LSU fans.
You can't bitch about us claiming these things in 2007 if this is the case.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 6:51 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
oklahoma absolutely should not have gotten in in 2003, nor should have nebraska in 2001. LSU at least won their last game in 2007
OU in 2003 was destroying people and was hands down the best team in the Big12. NU in 2001 I can see Oregon going instead.
CCGs are for money only, and should be looked at as simply another conference game. I like HTT (or maybe Matt)'s idea that the SEC's AQ is the SECCG winner, but the Conference Champ is the team with the best ranking/record in the final rankings
Posted on 11/28/10 at 7:40 pm to The Easter Bunny
i look at it as, if you win you're in, so shouldn't you be out if you lose?
Posted on 11/28/10 at 7:42 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
i look at it as, if you win you're in, so shouldn't you be out if you lose?
What does that mean?
Posted on 11/28/10 at 8:03 pm to lsumatt
if you lose the last game you should be out.
kind of like a playoff
kind of like a playoff
Posted on 11/28/10 at 8:06 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
if you lose the last game you s
that makes no sense at all.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 8:20 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
if you lose the last game you should be out.
great. Maybe the SEC can have the CG a week early and then everyone can play McNeese or something the last week.
There -Fixed that problem.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 8:28 pm to lsumatt
why does the NCAA basketball selection committee look at the last 10 games? that keeps teams out of the tournament
Posted on 11/28/10 at 8:52 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:If Auburn is required to win the SEC, then Wisconsin should also be required to win the SEC.
because wisconsin won their conference... if you lose the last game and still get in than what's the point?
Posted on 11/28/10 at 8:54 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:+1
quote:
it should matter when you lose
why? I hate that mentality. A loss is a loss. Wisconsin still lost a conference game, that would be the same as AU if AU loses Saturday, the difference would be no one can match AU, when Wisky lost, others could have had a better record.
A loss on September 1 counts just as much as does a loss on December 1.
Posted on 11/28/10 at 8:57 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:It's a 2-team playoff. Oklahoma was so good in 2003 that they had clinched a spot in the Sugar Bowl before their last game. They earned that, so they were awarded that.
if you lose the last game you should be out.
kind of like a playoff
If you want to count a game on December 6 more than you count a game on October 6, why even play the game on October 6 at all?
Posted on 11/28/10 at 8:57 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:We're talking about football.
why does the NCAA basketball selection committee look at the last 10 games? that keeps teams out of the tournament
Posted on 11/28/10 at 8:59 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
why does the NCAA basketball selection committee look at the last 10 games? that keeps teams out of the
Really? If #1 Duke loses in the ACC tournament they would be out?
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News