- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you be in favor of another College Baseball tournament(like the NIT) for baseball?
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:13 pm to ZZTIGERS
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:13 pm to ZZTIGERS
quote:
Ummm, no. If you can comprehend(which you apparently can’t), instead of teams like Nicholls St & Grambling you could watch quality baseball from teams like Charleston & Coastal Carolina.
You could also choose not to watch. Novel concept, I know.
so are you removing the AQs and giving them their own tournament?
or are you putting teams like Charleston and Coastal in the NIT type tourney?
2
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:15 pm to Nutriaitch
My choice, remove AQ.
ETA: But we know that’s not gonna happen.
ETA: But we know that’s not gonna happen.
This post was edited on 5/27/24 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:36 pm to ZZTIGERS
Why? So you can fill the actual tournament with more teams you've heard of?
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:41 pm to jmcwhrter
quote:
Why? So you can fill the actual tournament with more teams you've heard of?
Your question makes no sense??. I want the best 64 teams, not Grambling.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:47 pm to jmcwhrter
quote:
So you can fill the actual tournament with more teams you've heard of?
no he's saying teams like Ole Miss would get into the field of 64 over Automatic Qualifiers that have less than zero shot of winning more than maybe one game.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:49 pm to ZZTIGERS
quote:
My choice, remove AQ.
so no guaranteed bids, just have the committee select best 64?
Posted on 5/27/24 at 9:51 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
so no guaranteed bids, just have the committee select best 64?
Absolutely. Use RPI, or some other metric to guide them. But no AQ.
Posted on 5/27/24 at 10:14 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
o are you removing the AQs and giving them their own tournament?
Then Tennessee couldn’t win the national championship
Posted on 5/27/24 at 10:58 pm to ZZTIGERS
quote:
Well you could chose not to watch,
The whole country would choose not to watch.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 12:31 am to ZZTIGERS
quote:
I want the best 64 teams, not Grambling.
With that logic, the 2008 National Champion Fresno State Bulldogs would have never had their chance to get hot and go on a magical run to win it all.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 12:44 am to UncleLester
quote:
With that logic, the 2008 National Champion Fresno State Bulldogs would have never had their chance to get hot and go on a magical run to win it all.
Oh well, 1 example out of how many years?
Posted on 5/28/24 at 2:22 am to ZZTIGERS
quote:
Oh well, 1 example out of how many years?
OK. Let’s go all the way back to last year (2023).
Oral Roberts, #76 RPI that won their conference tournament, was a #4 seed in a Regional that would have not qualified with your “logic”.
They won their Regional. Won a Super Regional. And won their first game in Omaha.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 2:47 am to UncleLester
quote:
OK. Let’s go all the way back to last year (2023). Oral Roberts, #76 RPI that won their conference tournament, was a #4 seed in a Regional that would have not qualified with your “logic”. They won their Regional. Won a Super Regional. And won their first game in Omaha.
Still fine with them being left out. A much more deserving team was left out because of them. Sentimentality is no reason to slight way more deserving teams.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 4:28 am to ZZTIGERS
quote:
Your question makes no sense??.
Irony is ironic!
Is that sentence supposed to be two questions and one statement at the same time?
Posted on 5/28/24 at 5:59 am to ZZTIGERS
quote:
instead of teams like Nicholls St & Grambling you could watch quality baseball from teams like Charleston & Coastal Carolina.
Not sure why you putting Nicholls with Grambling. Nicholls is a 3 seed where as Tulane is a 4 seed. So you don't think Tulane should be in a regional.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 6:29 am to ZZTIGERS
No one cares about the actual baseball tournament
Posted on 5/28/24 at 6:48 am to ZZTIGERS
quote:
You fricking people are the same as the fricking losers who complain about too many Bowl Games.
Lol, there are too many bowl games.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 7:23 am to ZZTIGERS
quote:
Would you be in favor of another College Baseball tournament(like the NIT) for baseball?
No
Posted on 5/28/24 at 7:30 am to ZZTIGERS
quote:
Ummm, no. If you can comprehend(which you apparently can’t), instead of teams like Nicholls St & Grambling you could watch quality baseball from teams like Charleston & Coastal Carolina.
Didn’t Coastal host a regional last year and failed to advance?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News