Started By
Message

re: WNBA Star Erica Wheeler thinks you're all broke losers

Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:19 am to
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49695 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:19 am to
quote:

WNBA will go bankrupt soon enough.


I guess it is how you look at it.

I don't think you can say the WNBA can go bankrupt when it has never existed on its own. It has always been subsidized by the NBA.

Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27211 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:24 am to
quote:

quote:
The national basketball players association doesnt lose a single cent to the WNBA. What in the hell are you talking about?



LOL

Do you not understand the WNBA is losing millions?
And the REVENUE to support those lost millions are coming from the NBA?

Pretty simple.


How stupid are you mofos that you dont even understand the difference between revenue and profit? Yet youll criticize billionaire owners with teams full of financial advisors like they are the idiots and are losing money
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80527 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:24 am to
quote:

LOL

Do you not understand the WNBA is losing millions?
And the REVENUE to support those lost millions are coming from the NBA?

Pretty simple.



The NBA generated $12.25 billion in revenue last year. It expected to reached $15B this year.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80527 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:26 am to
quote:

How stupid are you mofos that you dont even understand the difference between revenue and profit? Yet youll criticize billionaire owners with teams full of financial advisors like they are the idiots and are losing money


Its used in discussions because profit margins are different for every team and not released publicly.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
28287 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:27 am to
quote:

How do you think the WNBA is making the NBA lose revenue



Don't think you're comprehending this discussion.

Who ultimately generates the revenue from the NBA that subsidizes the WNBA?
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27211 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Its used in discussions because profit margins are different for every team and not released publicly.

He was using it to say the National Basketball Players Association was losing money because the WNBA made the NBA lose revenue. It doesnt make any sense at all. The NBPA gets a ~50% split of revenue, not profit.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80527 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:33 am to
quote:

He was using it to say the National Basketball Players Association was losing money because the WNBA made the NBA lose revenue. It doesnt make any sense at all. The NBPA gets a ~50% split of revenue, not profit.


Agreed on that.

The owners do lose profit, albeit relatively minimal.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30123 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Yet youll criticize billionaire owners with teams full of financial advisors like they are the idiots and are losing money


I think the arguments are going in circles at this point.

As for billionaire owners: they will play the long game. Hypothetically, losing money short term for some worthy cause may be part of the bigger picture. Whether it’s a social cause, disaster relief, etc. Like you said, these billionaires are smart.

People tend to believe what they see. People here don’t really see popularity within the league that would equate to these contracts being worth north of a million. I don’t hear anybody talking about the league. I don’t recall ever seeing a WNBA jersey in the wild. I can think of maybe 3 teams that are known for having big crowds.

Because there is a larger social cause at work here, that could explain some things.

I’m not going to change your mind here. I don’t “hate” the league. I don’t give a shite if some star makes over a million. Something just doesn’t add up to me. You couple that with the athletes being known to shite on potential fans, and I find it hard to believe it’s actual value is worth what the TV deal is paying.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27211 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Don't think you're comprehending this discussion.

Who ultimately generates the revenue from the NBA that subsidizes the WNBA?

It doesnt matter what the NBA/Owners do with their half of the revenue generated by the NBA. The players get their 50% regardless. Its the reason why they are guaranteed half of revenue instead of half of profits. The owners can always find more expenses to cook the books to lower profits.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91552 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:36 am to
quote:

That's such bullshite. They'd get blowback from the Jemelle Hills of the world for about 15 minutes. Then, no one would care.
Idk man


There are a lot of folks trying to Gretchen Weiners the WNBA. You don’t think it would be a bigger deal if some guys who make unbelievable amounts of money ended the WNBA?
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27211 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:38 am to
quote:

People tend to believe what they see. People here don’t really see popularity within the league that would equate to these contracts being worth north of a million. I don’t hear anybody talking about the league. I don’t recall ever seeing a WNBA jersey in the wild. I can think of maybe 3 teams that are known for having big crowds.

Compare the number of WNBA posts now vs 5, 10, 20 years ago on Tigerdroppings.com
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91552 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:39 am to
quote:

As for billionaire owners: they will play the long game. Hypothetically, losing money short term for some worthy cause may be part of the bigger picture. Whether it’s a social cause, disaster relief, etc. Like you said, these billionaires are smart.
I just assume they’re paying for protection.

You want your shiny toy? Then you’ll part with some of these profits and keep the WNBA game afloat.

If not, we’ll find someone who will.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30123 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Compare the number of WNBA posts now vs 5, 10, 20 years ago on Tigerdroppings.com


When 95% of it is negative…? I don’t think this is a situation where arguing on TD or shitting on the league is generating revenue via clicks.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30123 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:40 am to
quote:

You don’t think it would be a bigger deal if some guys who make unbelievable amounts of money ended the WNBA?


He’s arguing the league is popular, then saying if it went under, it wouldn’t be a major issue. That’s contradictory.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91552 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Compare the number of WNBA posts now vs 5, 10, 20 years ago on Tigerdroppings.com
I genuinely think it’s a product of Trump, the right pushing back a little bit, and a white girl being shite on by the league.

I would not be surprised if the WNBA is peaking right now only to revert back to obscurity.

Seems like it’s just an arena for people to air grievances and fight the social battle that has been so popular recently.

Lose that and the league has nothing left, imo,
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27211 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:44 am to
quote:

When 95% of it is negative…? I don’t think this is a situation where arguing on TD or shitting on the league is generating revenue via clicks.

You are missing the cause of there being so many more (even if they are mostly negative) posts now. Its because it is more relevant/popular/mainstream. Just talking about it here at all much less these multiple page threads shows how much more popular it is than in the past.
This post was edited on 4/17/26 at 10:45 am
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41037 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:55 am to
Of course not. No one gives a shite about the WNBA. It'd be a momentary kerfuffle until the do-gooders get distracted by the next SJW cause du jour.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30123 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Its because it is more relevant/popular/mainstream. Just talking about it here at all much less these multiple page threads shows how much more popular it is than in the past.


I don’t think anybody will argue that. There’s also been a major push by ESPN and athletes across social media to try to get the WNBA as many likes as possible. Again, is it enough? Will the league ever truly be able to stand on its own?
Posted by LSUgrad88
Member since Jun 2009
9154 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Remarkable how untalented and annoying an entire professional league can be.


Its just so true. And look at the upvotes (123) and downvotes (0) to this comment. Says a lot.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram