- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/8/23 at 3:30 pm to RLDSC FAN
Maybe but there will still be a QB there at 2. Will someone really prefer one of Stroud/Young so much that they trade up to 1? Is one of those guys really that much better?
Posted on 1/8/23 at 3:32 pm to H-Town Tiger
Fair point. I worry about Young's size, but I do think he's the superior QB this year.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 3:33 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
Lovie Smith: "Whenever you play, you play to win the game. It's as simple as that."
Except in week 1 when you played for a tie
I hate this franchise so much
This post was edited on 1/8/23 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 1/8/23 at 3:33 pm to RLDSC FAN
trade their running qb, load up on picks and take qb in draft
Posted on 1/8/23 at 3:33 pm to NWHoustonTiger
They should definitely be looking to trade out of 1
Posted on 1/8/23 at 3:43 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
I worry about Young's size, but I do think he's the superior QB this year.
I agree on both points though I haven’t seen as much of Stroud outside of the UGA game.
2024 is the #1 pick I’d want with Williams
This post was edited on 1/8/23 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 1/8/23 at 3:46 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
What would you do if you were the Bears GM?
Trade down and draft nothing but offensive linemen.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 3:48 pm to H-Town Tiger
Do you realize how valuable the #1 pick is compared to the #2 pick?
Yes. Its the NFL. There is a sucker born every minute. Look no further than the Saints abortion of draft trades last year.
quote:
Is someone really trading for Young or Stroud when you can draft the other one?
Yes. Its the NFL. There is a sucker born every minute. Look no further than the Saints abortion of draft trades last year.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 4:01 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:
Do you realize how valuable the #1 pick is compared to the #2 pick?
Depends on the year. There’s not that franchise QB like Lawrence in this draft.
quote:
Yes. Its the NFL. There is a sucker born every minute. Look no further than the Saints abortion of draft trades last year.
Yes teams make bad trades all time, but not EVERY time. When’s the last time someone traded up to #1? Again there’s not that 1 guy (at least there doesn’t appear to be at this point) that will have teams clamoring to move up.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 4:16 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
Depends on the year.
No it doesn't. There will never be a year when the #1 overall pick is not a great deal more valuable than #2. There is literally a chart that just about every NFL GM uses when assigning value to a draft pick. The #1 overall is worth 400 pts more than the #2 pick, which is the numerical value of the 50th overall.
In simple terms, if you traded down from #1 to #2 you would expect to be awarded the #50 pick as well, or picks equivalent to 400 numerical points.
You can argue who is available and its a weak draft whatever. That has nothing do to with the numerical value of the pick. Obviously you would likely be able to receive over and above that value if there was a clear cut generational type QB, but unless you are a brain dead franchise like the Saints or have a GM like BoB, there is a lot more value there than at #2.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 4:51 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Trade down
Everyone says this, but it's easier said than done.
You have to have a dance partner willing to practically give up all of their draft capital in order to move up to #1.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 4:58 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
Everyone says this, but it's easier said than done.
But that's usually because the team that has the first pick isn't looking to trade it. The bears will be all in on trades. They're committed to building a team around Fields.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 5:03 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:
You can argue who is available and its a weak draft whatever. That has nothing do to with the numerical value of the pick
All that matters is who is available the rest is just on paper. The “value” is if you wanted to trade and for that you need someone who wants to trade up for a specific player.
I get what you are saying but if the Texans draft Young at 2 instead of 1 he’s still the same player
Posted on 1/8/23 at 5:05 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
But that's usually because the team that has the first pick isn't looking to trade it. The bears will be all in on trades.
But the question is will someone else be all in in trading up to 1? A lot will change between now and draft day but the best guess is Chicago takes Anderson or Carter to replace the defensive players they traded
Posted on 1/8/23 at 5:08 pm to RLDSC FAN
Houston is a bunch of idiots for actually winning the game. Chicago will have to decide if Fields is their future, but could get a haul from a QB needy team.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 5:11 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
But the question is will someone else be all in in trading up to 1?
I think it's pretty fair to assume the Colts will. I think the Raiders will too.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 5:12 pm to RLDSC FAN
I am sure they'll frick it up somehow.
Someone will want Bryce Young bad enough to make an enticing trade offer
Someone will want Bryce Young bad enough to make an enticing trade offer
Posted on 1/8/23 at 5:20 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Trade down with a QB needy team and stock up on draft picks, they need help everywhere much like the Texans.
The Bears defense is solid. They just got hit with a lot of injuries. I agree they should trade the #1 for a slew of later picks to fill needs on offense.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 5:38 pm to RLDSC FAN
Trade down because they not drafting a QB they got Fields now
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News