- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why don't the Bengals cut ties with Shemir Stewart and just sign Hendrickson to a deal?
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:50 pm to cubsfan5150
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:50 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
which is a clause the Bengals added recently to mirror other teams around the league.
This is 100% wrong. They’ve put it or attempted to in every rookie contract since 2000.
1
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:51 pm to TackySweater
I figured as much
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:54 pm to TackySweater
It’s called the “Pickens Clause”. You feel free to Google it lol.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:55 pm to DBG
quote:
This is 100% wrong. They’ve put it or attempted to in every rookie contract since 2000.
Link?
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:56 pm to cubsfan5150
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:03 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
My understanding is he is the first player that is being asked to sign that contract. He is 1 of 1 player.
Stewart should say that since he’s the only one who’s being required to sign such a contract, he’ll sign it, but it’ll cost the team an extra $1 million per year. That’s the cost of that provision. The Bengals shouldn’t be the only team that can screw over a player by requiring such a provision. The Bengals should be bound by the standard player contract, which doesn’t include that. If they want it, let them f*cking pay for it.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:04 pm to DBG
Oh shite. I didn’t realize Carson Palmer lost his money for saying dumb shite.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:05 pm to MMauler
quote:mwell apparently he’s not lol
Stewart should say that since he’s the only one who’s being required to sign such a contract,
quote:
The Bengals shouldn’t be the only team that can screw over a player by requiring such a provision
Wait. You think he loses the money just for signing the contract?
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 7:07 pm
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:19 pm to MMauler
quote:
Stewart should say that since he’s the only one who’s being required to sign such a contract, he’ll sign it, but it’ll cost the team an extra $1 million per year. That’s the cost of that provision. The Bengals shouldn’t be the only team that can screw over a player by requiring such a provision. The Bengals should be bound by the standard player contract, which doesn’t include that. If they want it, let them f*cking pay for it.
I don't think that's allowed per the rookie pay scale.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:23 pm to DBG
Your link has nearly nothing to do with Stewart’s situation
Posted on 7/24/25 at 7:51 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
Your link has nearly nothing to do with Stewart’s situation
Yes it does considering the language is the same verbatim. Dumbass
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:21 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Yes it does considering the language is the same verbatim. Dumbass
So they've done this before?
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:26 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
That language appears different
Is not the same as
The second part is where the public opinion gets involved. Thats new.
quote:
breaches player's obligation of loyalty to the club, club coaches, or club management."
Is not the same as
quote:
breaches Player's obligation of loyalty to Club and/or undermines the public's respect for the Club, Club coaches, or Club management
The second part is where the public opinion gets involved. Thats new.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:31 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Yes it does considering the language is the same verbatim. Dumbass
Dude, just how fricking dumb are you?
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:33 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
Dude, just how fricking dumb are you?
Think about how dumb you are and divide it by about a billion and you’ll get close
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:35 pm to cubsfan5150
He thinks it’s good business practice to:
1) expect guaranteed money even if you’re a dumbass and so really dumb shite, sometimes against your employer
2) someone making an investment to just be ok with #1
THIS is what we’re dealing with here lol
1) expect guaranteed money even if you’re a dumbass and so really dumb shite, sometimes against your employer
2) someone making an investment to just be ok with #1
THIS is what we’re dealing with here lol
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 9:38 pm
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:41 pm to TackySweater
quote:
He thinks it’s good business practice to:
1) expect guaranteed money
You do realize all first round picks get guaranteed money at their slot value right?
The Bengals knew when they selected him they would have to guarantee whoever they took with that pick that amount.
quote:
In the NFL, first-round draft picks receive fully guaranteed contracts, meaning the full value of the contract, including bonuses, is guaranteed to be paid to the player regardless of performance or other factors. These guarantees apply to both the base salary and any signing bonuses, ensuring the player receives the agreed-upon amount.
They should've just traded the pick away and took a 2nd round pick rather than throwing it away if they dont wanna pay.
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 7/24/25 at 9:50 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
You do realize all first round picks get guaranteed money at their slot value right?
I mean. Apparently not lol
quote:
rather than throwing it away if they dont wanna pay.
Imagine thinking that’s what this is lol
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 10:32 pm
Posted on 7/24/25 at 10:57 pm to TackySweater
quote:
TackySweater
Doing fricking work in this thread.
Page 14 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News