- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which p5 schools would rebrand their whole AD for $500 million?
Posted on 10/14/19 at 7:01 pm to wildtigercat93
Posted on 10/14/19 at 7:01 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Feel like Arizona would.
Nah, Arizona is pretty prideful. The block A, Bear Down, red and blue, I don't see us giving that up.
ASU rebranded a few years ago for a lot less than 500 mil, but I wouldn't see is giving up quite that easily.
2
Posted on 10/14/19 at 7:01 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 10/14/19 at 7:06 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Stanford could be anything new and they'd still be Stanford. I don't think anyone would be up in arms if they changed their unis and stupid mascot.
I think the school/alums definitely would
quote:
And those are usually "smart" schools. Which is why Rutgers is also a good example. Scarlett Knights? Who is holding that dear to their hearts but alums?
Rutgers is by no means a “smart school” nor is it a school that is held in the same regard as Stanford
Rutgers has an alumni base that just doesn’t care
Stanford alums may not care about football (especially not like we do) but they would definitely care about the whole university/AD being rebranded and no longer being the Stanford Cardinal
Especially when they are consistently a player in all the other sports that aren’t MBB of CFB
This post was edited on 10/14/19 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 10/14/19 at 7:11 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:Elway
Stanford's claim to fame
Posted on 10/14/19 at 7:31 pm to Rep520
Yea the block A is a pretty symbolic logo
Especially because of their basketball program
Especially because of their basketball program
Posted on 10/14/19 at 9:54 pm to I Bleed Garnet
Thought about Arizona. It yeah basketball probably kills it.
What about USCe?!?
What about USCe?!?
Posted on 10/14/19 at 9:55 pm to Draconian Sanctions
The significant majority.
That's a frick ton of money
That's a frick ton of money
Posted on 10/14/19 at 9:56 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
What about USCe?!?
We are the gamecocks
We’re the only one in FBS
Although the school (not AD) already did It
We have rebranded as UofSC
And the reason you haven’t heard it?
Because we are a little podunk school in Columbia SC
Posted on 10/14/19 at 9:58 pm to Draconian Sanctions
We definitely would've done it when Jeremy Foley was still in charge.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 10:22 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Of those, I’d say Rutgers.
Pitt has a very rich athletic history, it’s just a bit dated. Their return to the throwback logos is much better than their visual identity when Larry Fitzgerald was there.
I always thought Wake Forest had a bland ‘WF’ logo, but the colors and mascot are pretty sweet.
Pitt has a very rich athletic history, it’s just a bit dated. Their return to the throwback logos is much better than their visual identity when Larry Fitzgerald was there.
I always thought Wake Forest had a bland ‘WF’ logo, but the colors and mascot are pretty sweet.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 10:23 pm to Draconian Sanctions
For a p5 athletics program, Miami is pretty dang cheap.
I think they would strongly consider the money
I think they would strongly consider the money
Posted on 10/14/19 at 10:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Ole Miss. They are the Rebels, but had a black bear mascot and now some landshark. Maybe with a rebrand they will have a mascot that goes with the team name
Posted on 10/14/19 at 10:46 pm to Rep520
That ASU rebrand is absolutely terrible too.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 11:01 pm to Draconian Sanctions
My only regret is I didn’t make the 1st page.
Posted on 10/14/19 at 11:05 pm to Draconian Sanctions
USC did a version of it..and all the guy who paid it got was to name Lynn Swann was AD.
https://larrybrownsports.com/college-basketball/lynn-swann-resigned-usc-ad-wayne-hughes-donor/513857
https://larrybrownsports.com/college-basketball/lynn-swann-resigned-usc-ad-wayne-hughes-donor/513857
This post was edited on 10/14/19 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 10/14/19 at 11:13 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Coastal carolina
Posted on 10/14/19 at 11:24 pm to FellOffTheJetwayAgai
p5 only
Posted on 10/14/19 at 11:47 pm to Anaximander
That article you linked has nothing to do with rebranding.
Athletic Department, not Athletic Director.
Athletic Department, not Athletic Director.
This post was edited on 10/14/19 at 11:48 pm
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:54 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
That article you linked has nothing to do with rebranding.
Athletic Department, not Athletic Director.
I agree...he got far less for his money.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 8:25 am to Draconian Sanctions
Quite few schools, including Florida, rebrand temporarily for a lot less than $500 million.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/9427359/image_handler.jpeg)
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News