Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

What are some ideas regarding a Salary Cap regime for MLB?

Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:54 am
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56576 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:54 am
Maybe mirror the NFL system?
Posted by stlslick
St.Louis,Mo
Member since Nov 2012
15446 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:57 am to
it starts with a salary floor.

no more of the pirates shite, where they would put out shite teams, and then suck up luxury cash, only to give it as bonuses to front office. and MLB punished them finally for it.

also, ANY/ALL luxury cash from big spenders goes into team/minor leagues none to owners.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56576 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:59 am to
quote:

no more of the pirates shite, where they would put out shite teams, and then suck up luxury cash, only to give it as bonuses to front office. and MLB punished them finally for it.


That's a good idea.
Posted by Cliff Booth
Member since Feb 2021
3417 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

What are some ideas regarding a Salary Cap regime for MLB?


Whatever the NFL/NBA/NHL do.
Posted by lurking
Member since Nov 2022
3604 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 10:37 am to
quote:

it starts with a salary floor.


Correct. You’re not getting one without the other. I’ve generally been against a cap, but I’m starting to reconsider.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
83080 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 10:42 am to
Count deferred salary against the cap.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53400 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 11:02 am to
What’s the average salary for a MLB team? What would be a good difference in the salary cap and the salary floor? 50 million?
Posted by Rainier Fog
Member since Jul 2025
1962 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

What’s the average salary for a MLB team?


Without Dodgers salary about $150 million
With Dodgers Salary about $300 million
Posted by GoGators1995
Member since Jan 2023
8356 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 4:50 pm to
Hard cap with 90% floor.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104559 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 4:57 pm to
Biggest thing is to close up the deferred salary loophole.

A salary floor would be a step in the right direction as well.. although I do see some drawbacks to a team really going through a rebuild and not wanting to put big salaries on veterans that don't fit the plan.

I don't think we're going to see any sort of hard salary cap.
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8699 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 6:28 pm to
We will have until the 2028 season to come up with ideas
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
16044 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

A salary floor would be a step in the right direction as well.. although I do see some drawbacks to a team really going through a rebuild and not wanting to put big salaries on veterans that don't fit the plan.


I’d support a poor man’s tax. Owners would have to pay up if they spend under the floor. They could then choose to pay the tax for a year or two when in rebuilding period.
Posted by Boss
Member since Dec 2007
1898 posts
Posted on 8/2/26 at 8:00 pm to
Since baseball salaries are guaranteed make all compensation be spread evenly over life of contract. If the player retires or gets cut the cap accelerates in that year.
Posted by BigD43
Member since Jun 2016
1477 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

no more of the pirates shite, where they would put out shite teams, and then suck up luxury cash, only to give it as bonuses to front office. and MLB punished them finally for it.



Last year a Pittsburgh journalist reported the Pirates were losing money and the owner hadnt taken a salary in years.

Meanwhile, the Penguins can keep Letang, Crosby, and Malkin. The two latter betting two of the three best this century.

There are MLB teams with a gross revenue less than other team's payroll. The league is a joke.
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 6:02 pm
Posted by Bigdawgb
Member since Oct 2023
4772 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

although I do see some drawbacks to a team really going through a rebuild and not wanting to put big salaries on veterans that don't fit the plan.


I agree & think you could possibly carve out a rebuilding exception that allows for a certain # of seasons under the floor within a decade or other defined time period. It would have to be heavily regulated to prevent abuse but might be able to give both sides a decent compromise.
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 7:46 pm
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8699 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

Last year a Pittsburgh journalist reported the Pirates were losing money and the owner hadnt taken a salary in years.


Yet they could sell that asset for a billion plus most likely.
Posted by BigD43
Member since Jun 2016
1477 posts
Posted on 8/4/26 at 5:43 am to
quote:

Yet they could sell that asset for a billion plus most likely.



You're right but what does that have to do with anything?

Also, the owner made it clear he isnt selling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram