Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:01 am to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112666 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:01 am to
quote:

to me it looked like he was just going to the ground with the ball
Certainly plausible. My main issue is I just don't think you can say it definitively, and if you can't, then it's not indisputable.

And I may be putting words in the ref's mouth(or maybe he said it in his report, not sure?), but the ref basically eluded to saying that Dez did stretch for the goalline, but he just thought Dez didn't intend to stretch, which I think is kinda bizarre.
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 8:02 am
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17360 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:01 am to
No, I said sideline.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:05 am to
quote:

It's a pretty cut and dry rule


Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85492 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:16 am to
he wasn't stretching for the endzone, he was just falling to the ground...wtf?
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 8:17 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468268 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Also that was mentioned long ago, it's not new to this thread.

yeah it was mentioned as soon as the play occurred. it's not some new conspiracy

i mean it's CLEAR that the ref's should not have reversed the call. there was not indisputable evidence that the ball even hit the ground, let alone indisputable evidence that he didn't make a football move (and complete the catch) prior to the ball allegedly hitting the ground

i hope we can all agree on THAT point
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468268 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:19 am to
quote:

he wasn't stretching for the endzone, he was just falling to the ground...wtf?

he turns his body and stretches in my view

if he kept falling he'd have rolled out of bounds with the ball in a different position entirely, possibly behind his head
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85492 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:20 am to
quote:

there was not indisputable evidence that the ball even hit the ground


the ball hit the ground and popped up?

quote:

let alone indisputable evidence that he didn't make a football move


falling to the ground is a football move?
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
38846 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:21 am to
For the life of me I can't understand how people are saying it's obvious that Dez dove. It looked like he was stumbling/falling to the ground the entire time to me.
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17360 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:22 am to
quote:

there was not indisputable evidence that the ball even hit the ground


Sure there is.

quote:

let alone indisputable evidence that he didn't make a football move (and complete the catch) prior to the ball allegedly hitting the ground


That I will agree with.
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 8:23 am
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36889 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:22 am to
quote:

falling to the ground is a football move?


If a guy catches a pass, runs 45 yards and is tackled and the ball hits the turf, is that an incomplete pass? Sounds like it you zero in on all of the i's and t's in this rule it would be.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85492 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:23 am to
quote:

It looked like he was stumbling/falling to the ground the entire time to me.


this

and for SFP

here is defintive proof that the ball hit the ground and came loose

LINK
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 8:26 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468268 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:23 am to
quote:

the ball hit the ground and popped up?

his hand may have been under it. there is no camera angle that i've seen that shows the ball touching the ground

the person i was watching the game with (not a cowboys fan, either) immediately pointed that out live (i can't claim the point)

quote:

falling to the ground is a football move?

extending the ball is an example in the rulebook of a football move. dez did that in my eye
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85492 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:24 am to
quote:

If a guy catches a pass, runs 45 yards and is tackled and the ball hits the turf, is that an incomplete pass?


what?

Dez was running with the ball now? the frick?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85492 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:25 am to
quote:

extending the ball is an example in the rulebook of a football move. dez did that in my eye


so with the gif that I linked, he does seem to be stretching right at the last minute, but if you do not retain possession through the "football move" is that still a catch?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468268 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:27 am to
quote:

he is a defintive proof that the ball hit the ground and came loose

LINK

these have all been posted. none show the ball and the ground clearly touching. his hand is clearly under the ball and his forearm may be. the ball may have hit the ground also. i'm not sure. aka, it's disputable
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
29889 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:27 am to
quote:

"In our judgment he maintained possession but continued to fall and never had another act common to the game. We deemed that by our judgment to be the full process of the catch and at the time he lands and the ball hits the ground it comes loose as it hits the ground, which would make that incomplete. Although he re-possesses it, it does contact the ground when he reaches so the repossession is irrelevant because it was ruled an incomplete pass when he had the ball hit the ground."


So the ref's example states he "reaches", which i would think is a football move, considering he took 3 steps before reaching.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
45207 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:28 am to
In this slow motion view, no doubt to me he was going for the endzone

LINK
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85492 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:28 am to
quote:

none show the ball and the ground clearly touching. his hand is clearly under the ball and his forearm may be.


really...?

this is grasping

that CLEARLY hits the ground
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36889 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Dez was running with the ball now?


How would he get from the 4 to the half yard line? Swimming?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85492 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 8:29 am to
quote:

no doubt to me he was going for the endzone


fine

but if he doesn't retain possession through the "football move" does that still count?
Jump to page
Page First 30 31 32 33 34 ... 47
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 32 of 47Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram