- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:27 pm to Sho Nuff
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:27 pm to Sho Nuff
quote:
Had Dez reached the ball over the goal line and then hit the ground fumbling it loose, it would have been a TD.
Yes, but BECAUSE he reached the ball out and not because it crossed the goal line. If your scenario is a catch then, so is the one that actually happened because both involved a football move.
Crossing the goal line means nothing if you don't complete the catch without a football move. If Dez didn't catch it as is, it wasn't a catch had he crossed the line.
0
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:27 pm to dallastigers
quote:Nothing 100% shows it but the ball def touched the ground
Is there a video or gif showing ball actually touching the ground? Not moving and probably caused by ground but actually touching the ground.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:28 pm to RandySavage
quote:Not a catch.
It's a catch and if it's not according to NFL rules then the NFL rules are a joke. Well they are a joke anyway but this would just be another obvious example.
Dallas was gifted last week. They shouldn't have even been there.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:28 pm to dallastigers
quote:
Is there a video or gif showing ball actually touching the ground? Not moving and probably caused by ground but actually touching the ground.
Yes
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:29 pm to lsupride87
Roger you are 100% right. The only argument today is whether or not Dez stretched the ball out. If he did, then catch. If he didn't, then no catch. That is the only thing people should be discussing. The peopl talkig about falling and everything else are unclear of the rules
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:30 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Dallas was gifted last week. They shouldn't have even been there.
At least that was a judgment call. This was a case of the refs incorrectly invoking a rule in situation the rule book specifically excludes it from being used.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:31 pm to lsupride87
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/17/21 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:31 pm to DelU249
No
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:32 pm to Roger Klarvin
25 page thread on a ref decision that probably wouldn't have mattered anyway.
Rodgers was winning that game
Rodgers was winning that game
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:32 pm to graychef
Understood gray. But at this point I think most people in this thread should know that by now
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:32 pm to lsupride87
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/17/21 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Agreed as well Hail. GB was going to drive down easily. Hell they would have only needed a field goal. And they were in field goal range at the end without even trying to score
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:35 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
This was a case of the refs incorrectly invoking a rule in situation the rule book specifically excludes it from being used.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:36 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
25 page thread on a ref decision that probably wouldn't have mattered anyway.
Rodgers was winning that game
Maybe, but I'll take my chances with a one-legged Rodgers leading a game winning drive.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:36 pm to arrakis
and Dez wasn't penalized again two weeks in a row for being on the field without his helmet.
NO CATCH!!
NO CATCH!!
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:36 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:37 pm to Roger Klarvin
Roger they were in field goal range already and kneeled the ball to end the drive.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:38 pm to peaster68
We have read the report. The refs don't beelive Dez made an act common to the game. I beleive he did
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:38 pm to DelU249
quote:
That's how that would be called if you removed the end zone
Crossing the plane with possession ends the play immediately making the kicking of the ball irrelevant
Then the Calvin Johnson play should have been a catch because he was in the endzone when he caught it then went to the ground and it popped out. By your definition the TD was before the ball came out. Per the rules either both should be a TD or neither. In my mind all 3 should have been completed catches but the NFL rule book doesn't allow for common sense.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 5:39 pm to lsupride87
So, can you fumble the ball after a forward pass? Wouldn't it just be considered an incomplete pass since all you did was not maintain possession to the ground/tackle?
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 5:40 pm
Page 25 of 47
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News