- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:58 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:Actually it does matter.
Doesn't matter if he was making an active effort to stretch the ball.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:58 pm to bamabenny
quote:
If anything, the stretch is what screwed him.
This right here. He should have protected the ball. He should not have reached. He lost control, after the catch, and that is what opened it up to interpretation.
Dez, who does he think he is, OBJ!
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:59 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yep, some people just will not see it though.
Again the fact that he was falling doesn't matter because he made a football move. Nobody is saying he wasn't falling.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:59 pm to catholictigerfan
Mike Pereira. Also said he wasn't sure if the stretch and dive was pronounced enough to be a football move. There for ruling on field should stand even by his account of it. He just completely threw out the ruling on the field which trumps all.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:59 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Actually it does matter.
Not based on precedent or the rule itself. The rule makes no exception for a falling player, and that same play has always been upheld as a catch.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:59 pm to Roger Klarvin
Nobody is saying that? Hell, most cowboy fans are saying he caught it then dove to the line
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:00 pm to Roger Klarvin
The second he stretches that ball out to the goal line, he is making a football move. At that moment, it is a catch.
His elbow was down before the fumble, so it should have been spotted at the 1-yard line.
Once again, the fact that they REVERSED that call, when the decision on whether he stretched the ball and made a football move is AT MOST debatable, is simply a terrible call.
His elbow was down before the fumble, so it should have been spotted at the 1-yard line.
Once again, the fact that they REVERSED that call, when the decision on whether he stretched the ball and made a football move is AT MOST debatable, is simply a terrible call.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:00 pm to TH03
I fricking hate the cowboys
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:00 pm to Catman88
quote:
No shite. Yes he was falling down that is why the rule of football move applies. The question of if he made a football move comes to question. He can let the ball hit the ground IF he makes a football move. Its debatable. If it were not this thread wouldn't exist. So ruling on field stands.
Cowboy fans are grasping for straws trying to defend this catch. In the mid of the ref he didn't make a football move, the ground caused the ball to come dislodged from the players hand, and therefore it is incomplete.
I'll keep dropping it, Mike Pereira said no catch, are some of you on here suggesting you know more than a former VP of officiating?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:00 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
That wasn't clearly happening.
Yu're clearly ignoring reality.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:00 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:If he was falling from the point of the catch, which he was, he has to maintain the catch through the ground.
Again the fact that he was falling doesn't matter because he made a football move. Nobody is saying he wasn't falling.
This isn't rocket science.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:01 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Once again, the fact that they REVERSED that call, when the decision on whether he stretched the ball and made a football move is AT MOST debatable, is simply a terrible call.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:01 pm to Catman88
quote:
Mike Pereira. Also said he wasn't sure if the stretch and dive was pronounced enough to be a football move. There for ruling on field should stand even by his account of it. He just completely threw out the ruling on the field which trumps all.
Winner.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:01 pm to BayouBengals03
Your tears are hilarious
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:02 pm to catholictigerfan
Mike P said himself he wasn't sure whether or not the stretch was a football move. So without knowing it, he actually said the call should stand
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:02 pm to catholictigerfan
You are a dumb arse. fricking Mike Pereira even said himself that it was disputable on the football move. That single statement is all you need to make the ruling on the field stand. You cannot throw away the fact that the ruling was of a completed catch.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:02 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
The second he stretches that ball out to the goal line,
So he's stretching for the goal line here?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:02 pm to catholictigerfan
In the end, I don't care. I just really enjoy watching these individuals who supported last weeks call blow up over this call.
It's glorious how opinions change when you get the short straw.
It's glorious how opinions change when you get the short straw.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 4:03 pm to Scruffy
quote:
If he was falling from the point of the catch, which he was, he has to maintain the catch through the ground.
This isn't rocket science
Not if he makes a football move.
Page 17 of 47
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News