- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:52 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:sure it's debatable.
That's debatable.
But switching his ball hand and a stretch at the end, you can't say it was indisputable, correct?
If it's debatable, then it shouldn't have been overturned.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:52 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
By your own post do you agree the ruling should have stood?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:52 pm to brgfather129
quote:
Are there really people in here arguing the ball never touched the ground...
there is not indisputable evidence that the ball hit the ground
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:52 pm to Eighteen
How is this thread 15 pages? That pass was easily incomplete. Falling down isn't a football move and the ball clearly hit the ground and popped up.
A lot of delusion up in here.
A lot of delusion up in here.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:52 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:Exactly.
It's not. It's about maintaining control through the catch. That's what makes it incomplete, not the steps.
This isn't hard to understand.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:52 pm to Catman88
He definitely made a "football move"......He caught the f'n football!
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:53 pm to Eighteen
quote:
Then it's not indisputable.
Him not controlling the ball through the catch was indisputable
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
there is not indisputable evidence that the ball hit the ground
Please tell me you're kidding
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:53 pm to bamabenny
quote:What about switching your ball hand and the stretch?
Falling down isn't a football move
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Yes there is. There was a camera on the other side of the field that showed the ball hitting the ground.
there is not indisputable evidence that the ball hit the ground
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:54 pm to DelU249
Not a catch
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:54 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Exactly.
This isn't hard to understand
If he makes a football move it doesn't have to be controlled to the ground
It's definitely understandable that this is debatable
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:54 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:That's irrelevant if you can't determine if he made a football move either way, indisputably.
Him not controlling the ball through the catch was indisputable
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:54 pm to LordoftheManor
At the end of the day, the only way to say he didn't make a football move is to assume he wasn't stretching for the endzone but rather just falling down.
That is not what the refs are paid to do, and that is not enough to overturn a call of a catch.
That is not what the refs are paid to do, and that is not enough to overturn a call of a catch.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:54 pm to shel311
quote:
quote: as has been said, he made a football move, so the completed catch was already done,so the rest doesn't apply.
Dude... Just because you make a football move doesn't mean the catch is completed. If that's how it was then you would be able to bobble the ball for 15 yards, without securing the ball, and then when the ball hits the ground it would be a fumble and not an incomplete.
You have to secure the catch ffirst and show clear possession. If the ball is moving / bobbling, it doesn't matter what you do until you secure the catch.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:54 pm to shel311
quote:
Another great point, how is switching hands not a football move?
switching hands?
dive?
cmon man
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:54 pm to Catman88
No, not according to the rule. He's falling as soon as he hits the ground. He must complete the act of the catch, which includes falling to the ground. He didn't do that
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:55 pm to shel311
Even then, he doesn't complete the process of the catch through the ground.
If anything, the stretch is what screwed him.
If anything, the stretch is what screwed him.
Page 15 of 47
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News