Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 8/15/10 at 10:01 am to
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
23896 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 10:01 am to
quote:

theres no damn Bulls in Chicago.


I thought that nickname was an homage to the time when Chicago was huge in the Live Stock trade and Meatpacking industry...

Still a badass color scheme.
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21938 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Los Angeles Angels


Yea, this bothers me too. It would be like the Baton Rouge Red Sticks.
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21938 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Bears and Bulls, bro...please say you get it now


Not sure what you mean by this, unless you're referring to the stock market, but I don't think they're really related. The Bears were named after the Cubs because they played their early years at Wrigley Field. The Bulls were named after Chicago's meatpacking industry, as a previous poster stated.
Posted by tiger band trumpet
Member since Sep 2008
5675 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 10:51 am to
quote:

The Raptors are horrible, as are the Ducks because both or based on movies and not anything to do with the city or fan base

quote:

Sophandros

Gordon Bombay will get you
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126568 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Washington Redskins


not a damn thing wrong with it or the KC Chiefs
Posted by BayouBandit24
Member since Aug 2010
16933 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 11:29 am to
if you think about it the mets is pretty worthless, short for metropolitans
Posted by Them
Metry
Member since Nov 2008
11324 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 11:54 am to
Atlanta Falcons
Nashville Predators - I mean, Jesus, your logo is a goddamned saber-toothed tiger. And your team is in Nashville.



Now i'll flip the script and say that there never has been a more APPROPRIATE team name than the Phoenix Coyotes.
Posted by SeattleTiger19
Member since Oct 2007
4537 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 12:06 pm to
I think the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim is the winner. The name just makes no sense.
Posted by MadMaxwell
The Motherland
Member since Jul 2009
4600 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 12:09 pm to
Atlanta Thrashers

Ridiculously stupid name
Posted by hsfolk
Member since Sep 2009
19159 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 1:54 pm to
Montreal Expos


Posted by BenDover
Member since Jul 2010
5544 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 2:32 pm to
Can someone tell me how the Minnesota Twins got their nickname?
Posted by Them
Metry
Member since Nov 2008
11324 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 2:35 pm to
Uh...Twin Cities?
Posted by lsusportsman2
Member since Oct 2007
27232 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Well I think they were called the Jazz because they came from somewhere else that made more logical sense and then moved to Utah


Yeah, New Orleans.
Posted by swagsurfin7
Founder of the Alex Morgan Fan Club
Member since Dec 2009
7288 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 2:51 pm to
The OKC Thunder, Minnesota Wild, Carolina Hurricanes
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 3:04 pm to
quote:


What I wanted was the return of the Oilers, but f*@k But Adams. That's a hate I'll likely never get over, I hate him like I don't hate anyone. I grew up with the Oilers, they were Houston's team. He could move the players, could take the coaches, but the Oilers should have stayed in Houston.



Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Macon Whoopie

This.


Also, I think "Columbus Crew" is a pretty shitty name too.
This post was edited on 8/15/10 at 3:17 pm
Posted by Chaz95
Dallas, Texas
Member since Nov 2007
19632 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

The Bears were named after the Cubs because they played their early years at Wrigley Field. The Bulls were named after Chicago's meatpacking industry, as a previous poster stated.


consider me educated.

when i was younger i thought it was clever as shite that chicago, who housed the Chicago Stock Exchange, named their two teams after bear and bull markets. now, i'm not as impressed with those names (if that is why they named them).
This post was edited on 8/15/10 at 3:30 pm
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36375 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 3:35 pm to
quote:


Also, I think "Columbus Crew" is a pretty shitty name too.


I mean, I'm (kind of) a Crew fan, so I'm a little biased, but I like this name, and think it's (at least a little) accurate (though it'd be better for a city like Cleveland, Detroit, Pittsburgh, etc).
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9612 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 3:44 pm to
I don't like "Houston Texans" from a marketing standpoint. It's a nickname that excludes people.

If you're from Arkansas or Louisiana or Oklahoma, are you going to be all fired up for... the Texans?

Their name alone tells you they're not interested in you or your support.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
28916 posts
Posted on 8/15/10 at 4:56 pm to
Texan isn't just a name for the native, so much as it was the identity of the state's/republic's military during the Texas Revolution. So in that sense, it carries more weight than your average state's term for its natives.

And also, I don't think it's a jab at the Dallas Texans, just the extension of a throwback name.

I mean, thinking of it in superficial terms, wouldn't the Packers, Browns, Bills, Steelers all have "lame" names?

I think that the good names are the ones that the local culture can identify with, and Texans (in the military sense) does that.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram