- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: tOfficial Week 10 College Football Playoff Rankings 1)CLEM 2)ALA 3)tOSU 4)ND
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:10 pm to AbuTheMonkey
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:10 pm to AbuTheMonkey
USC win has the potential to be huge for ND as well. Some efficiency rankings have then in the top ten!
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:12 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:Benign ranking. Stanford will either win out and win the Pac-12 and have a well-deserved higher ranking than LSU, or they won't, and LSU will be ranked higher.
There is no fricking way we should be two spots behind Stanford. What a crock of shite
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:13 pm to ballscaster
Tar Heels are too low.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:14 pm to rocket31
People are forgetting that USC or UCLA is probably going to win the South, not Utah.
Utah will choke.
USC/Stanford in the Pac 12 championship game would be intense.
Utah will choke.
USC/Stanford in the Pac 12 championship game would be intense.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:29 pm to SystemsGo
quote:
1. Clemson
2. Alabama
3. tOSU
4. Notre Dame
Any more brainbusters for me, bitches?
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:31 pm to rocket31
quote:
they should be, frick baylor.
peasant schedule
no they shouldn't be. Iowa is focking terrible.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:46 pm to HoLeInOnEr05
quote:Two FCS opponents. That is to a team's SOS what ovarian cancer was to Gilda Radner.
Tar Heels are too low.
(In case anyone is offended, I don't mean to imply that ovarian cancer is as bad as UNC's schedule.)
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:47 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:You and I are huge Trojan fans this month. If the trees beat the Irish and then the Trojans win the Pac-12....
USC/Stanford in the Pac 12 championship game would be intense.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:49 pm to ballscaster
quote:
If the trees beat the Irish and then the Trojans win the Pac-12....
at this point, the advanced metrics would support both those things happening.
ND has a 41% chance to beat Stanford according to FPI (which has issues, but its been decent predictor this year)
This post was edited on 11/10/15 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:50 pm to rocket31
quote:Stop talking dirty to me, you sexy bastard.
at this point, the advanced metrics would support both those things happening.
ND only has like a 43% chance to beat Stanford according to FPI (which has issues, but its been decent predictor this year)
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:54 pm to ballscaster
quote:
You and I are huge Trojan fans this month. If the trees beat the Irish and then the Trojans win the Pac-12....
Yep, agreed.
I don't think Utah would beat Stanford. So I'd rather have USC in that game.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 9:26 pm to BayouBengals03
LOL@ people getting upset about CFP rankings on November 10th.
Everything will shake out...and if it doesn't..well I dunno watch FCS or something.
Everything will shake out...and if it doesn't..well I dunno watch FCS or something.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 9:32 pm to WaltTeevens
I'm not sure how upset anyone actually is, it is more pointing out obvious flaws and logic that doesn't make sense.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 2:04 am to dcrews
quote:
They blew tcu up pretty badly.
One game doesnt make a season, OSU barley beat Texas with bad late calls, beat KSU by 2 and WVU by 7. They beat TCU who has given up 45 and 52 in wins.
OSU is not a good team.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 2:10 am to dcrews
Notre Dame lost by 2 and had 432 yards to Clemsons 290
Bama lost by 6 with 5 Turnovers having outgained Ole Miss by 80 yards....150 WITHOUT THE FREAK PLAY.
LSU lost by 14, and was outgained by 250 yards.
THE COMMITTE SEEMS TO BE WATCHING THE GAMES AND USING GAME CONTROL.
Bama lost by 6 with 5 Turnovers having outgained Ole Miss by 80 yards....150 WITHOUT THE FREAK PLAY.
LSU lost by 14, and was outgained by 250 yards.
THE COMMITTE SEEMS TO BE WATCHING THE GAMES AND USING GAME CONTROL.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 7:57 am to Tuskkman
quote:
THE COMMITTE SEEMS TO BE WATCHING THE GAMES AND USING GAME CONTROL.
and this is stupid.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:00 am to hiltacular
quote:
it is more pointing out obvious flaws and logic that doesn't make sense.
Hopefully everyone in this thread agrees Bama shouldn't be #2
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:01 am to BayouBengals03
explain how watching the games for nuances in the final outcome is stupid again? 
Posted on 11/11/15 at 8:50 am to rocket31
Eye test is stupid. Excusing a Stanford loss because they looked sluggish because the game was at 9am pacific time is stupid. Penalizing Michigan State for a game they "should have lost" against Michigan is stupid. Saying Alabama only lost because they turned the ball over 5 times is stupid.
You win or you lose. Again, college football is the only sport on the entire planet where results are somehow corrupted in some way.
You win or you lose. Again, college football is the only sport on the entire planet where results are somehow corrupted in some way.
Posted on 11/11/15 at 12:37 pm to BayouBengals03
Jeff Long just said Oklahoma State has had one test against TCU, and Baylor has had one test against Kansas State.
You know, the same Kansas State team that is 0-5 in the Big XII.
This man is a buffoon.
ETA: He says Clemson is a clear #1 right now.
You know, the same Kansas State team that is 0-5 in the Big XII.
This man is a buffoon.
ETA: He says Clemson is a clear #1 right now.
This post was edited on 11/11/15 at 12:40 pm
Popular
Back to top


1





