- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This is 2025, and that was the Crystal clear definition of Targeting
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:43 pm
That is all.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
If that’s not targeting, then they need to get rid of the rule.
Which I’m good with.
Which I’m good with.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
The NCAA is so corrupt. As bad as the NFL. Even under review they wouldn’t make the obvious call.
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
Was just coming to post this...if that wasn't Targeting then WHAT IN THE ACTUAL frick IS TARGETING?????!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
On this board, there is no targeting
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
Nobody can explain what targeting is anymore
Targeting calls seem to always favor TV money/ratings darlings though
Targeting calls seem to always favor TV money/ratings darlings though
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
I hope the rule is scraped or gutted next season because they aren’t even calling in consistently based on their own rules this season
The rule is written horribly but now it’s just ambiguous what it actually is and more get overturned/not called
The rule is written horribly but now it’s just ambiguous what it actually is and more get overturned/not called
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
Lol yet last year when Bama took a blatant cheap shot and target on Daniels, we were told it wasn’t.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
I don’t like targeting but if it’s going to be a rule you need to call it and that was a textbook one. Can’t have their cash cow in Texas getting knocked out early though.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
Texas always gets calls they want
Heck if they want extra time in a game they get it.
The refs always side with Texass
Heck if they want extra time in a game they get it.
The refs always side with Texass
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
What does the rule state because there was nothing with the crown and it was just a face on tackle
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:44 pm to BamaCoaster
It’s so hard to know what is or isn’t targeting 

Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:45 pm to BamaCoaster
Agree. And I want Texas to win. But that was targeting.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:45 pm to BamaCoaster
Agreed. Criminal.
Helmet to helmet on a defenseless player
Helmet to helmet on a defenseless player
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:45 pm to BamaCoaster
No it wasn't.
Their heads met. At full speed, while making a break on the ball, its impossible to avoid head contact.
It was actually textbook, he kept his head up.
Their heads met. At full speed, while making a break on the ball, its impossible to avoid head contact.
It was actually textbook, he kept his head up.
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:45 pm to SelaTiger
Highly doubt the announcers or pundits mention it again.
ASU coach doesn’t seem like a tight-roping, political type, so I hope he brings it up at the press conference.
Cause Texas is going to win.
ASU coach doesn’t seem like a tight-roping, political type, so I hope he brings it up at the press conference.
Cause Texas is going to win.
Posted on 1/1/25 at 3:46 pm to BamaCoaster
They robbed ASU of a win with that bullshite.
Popular
Back to top
