- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There is no googalable intel on this NFL blended clock rule they made up in game
Posted on 1/28/25 at 5:31 am to hiltacular
Posted on 1/28/25 at 5:31 am to hiltacular
Well these are stupid refs we are talking about so......
Posted on 1/28/25 at 7:46 am to JamalMurry27
So I know a guy who used to work productions at LSU games. There can 100% be a delay in the clock we see and the clock on the field. Happens all the time.
Posted on 1/28/25 at 8:48 am to theunknownknight
Evidence : “One Second Blues “.
Posted on 1/28/25 at 9:01 am to TackySweater
quote:
The refs use discretion when there is actually a snap.
The rule of thumb is they’re watching the play clock live from the field. When it hits 00 they look to see if the balls been snapped, usually giving the offense another half second or so
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:03 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
They cleared this with the refs. They were prepared to run a play but the refs told them they would allow them to go to the 2 min warning so that’s what they did.
Well, this is the problem. You can't just make a deal with the refs and expect to be given carte Blanche to do what you want.
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:21 am to 33inNC
They didn’t “make a deal” with the refs. They confirmed with them that the play clock and game clock were blended and didn’t need to run a play, as is normal in this situation.
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:36 am to JamalMurry27
Every team gets that extra second when the clock hits 0 on your tv screen.
Even the bad teams.
Even the bad teams.
Posted on 1/28/25 at 11:46 am to JamalMurry27
Personally I've always hated how delay of game is treated so subjectively by the officials. It just leaves too much discretion and opens doors for uneven officiating.
I've been watching football all my life. Sometimes delay of game is called half a second after the clock expires, sometimes they let it go. We've even seen times where the refs let it go for a full two seconds or more and the defense is pointing at the clock begging for the call. Sometimes it's even treated differently multiple times within the same game.
Why should the offense be given such leeway? I understand maybe back in the day when the tech wasn't there, but that hasn't been the case for a long time. Baseball has a pitch clock now and the umpires wear a buzzer on their wrist that vibrates when the pitch clock expires. If the pitcher hasn't started their motion then it's a violation. There's no reason why football can't do the same, they just don't want to.
Look, I'm not in favor of additional penalties or anything, but I also don't like how completely arbitrary it is when the refs DO and DO NOT call it. It's a clock, it's not like it's subjective. If the clock strikes :00 and you haven't snapped the ball it should be a penalty.
I've been watching football all my life. Sometimes delay of game is called half a second after the clock expires, sometimes they let it go. We've even seen times where the refs let it go for a full two seconds or more and the defense is pointing at the clock begging for the call. Sometimes it's even treated differently multiple times within the same game.
Why should the offense be given such leeway? I understand maybe back in the day when the tech wasn't there, but that hasn't been the case for a long time. Baseball has a pitch clock now and the umpires wear a buzzer on their wrist that vibrates when the pitch clock expires. If the pitcher hasn't started their motion then it's a violation. There's no reason why football can't do the same, they just don't want to.
Look, I'm not in favor of additional penalties or anything, but I also don't like how completely arbitrary it is when the refs DO and DO NOT call it. It's a clock, it's not like it's subjective. If the clock strikes :00 and you haven't snapped the ball it should be a penalty.
Posted on 1/28/25 at 6:22 pm to IggyReilly
They could easily have a ref in the booth with 2 side-by-side monitors. One on the clock. One on the ball. If this ref sees an infraction, he hits a button that buzzes the ref. Ref blows the play dead.
Now, the booth ref could be wrong on occasion by nanoseconds, but it would clear up 99% of this with ease.
Now, the booth ref could be wrong on occasion by nanoseconds, but it would clear up 99% of this with ease.
Posted on 1/28/25 at 7:34 pm to KCRoyalBlue
They could easily do it by replay, too.
Allow the play to run if close, replay immediately checks clock. If penalty, call down to refs on field and a penalty is assessed. If no penalty, the game moves along without stopping.
Allow the play to run if close, replay immediately checks clock. If penalty, call down to refs on field and a penalty is assessed. If no penalty, the game moves along without stopping.
This post was edited on 1/28/25 at 7:39 pm
Popular
Back to top
