Started By
Message

The one-time transfer rule for athletes in all sports has been approved by the NCAA

Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:10 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51630 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:10 pm
quote:

The one-time transfer rule for athletes in all sports has been approved by the NCAA's Division Council, source tells @TheAthletic. Athletes in all sports will be able to transfer once and be immediately eligible.

(This isn't official until end of Thursday's meeting.)

quote:

Notification dates passed, too, source tells @TheAthletic. In normal years, will be a May 1 deadline for fall/winter-sport athletes to tell their schools they're transferring & a July 1 deadline for spring-sport athletes.

(This isn't official until end of Thursday's meeting.)


LINK
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76526 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:13 pm to
Good.
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21321 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:13 pm to
It is crazy how my interest in college sports has cratered over the last year. The closer it gets to a minor league the less I care.
Posted by diremustang
Member since Oct 2017
2287 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:14 pm to
The NCAA will be dead by 2030. Few will be sad to see it go
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64692 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Good

who is this good for?

quote:

Since Aug. 1, about 1,500 players have entered the transfer portal, according to a 247Sports database that tracks portal movement. That’s just 200 players shy of the total number who entered the portal all of last cycle, from Aug. 1, 2019 to July 31, 2020.

However, portal numbers can be skewed. As many as one-third of those players are walk-ons, according to an SI examination of the portal. As of last week, only 964 of the 1,500 FBS players in the portal garnered a recruiting ranking from 247Sports (a vast majority of the other 500 are walk-ons).

Of the 964, nearly 60% (558) are uncommitted and still searching for a landing spot. The 964 players are split between those transferring from the Power 5 (557 players) and those transferring from the Group of Five (407 players). In a striking statistic, of the 299 Power 5 players who have committed to a new school, 60% took a step down in level, their next destination a Group of Five or FCS school. Just one-third of Group of Five transfers stepped up to the Power 5.


This is good for programs like Alabama and blue-chip prospects who will have dozens of offers. For the vast majority of programs and players, this is going to work out very poorly for them
Posted by D011ahbi11
Member since Jun 2007
13621 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

who is this good for?


It worked fine for years in baseball


quote:

This is good for programs like Alabama

They already get whoever they want
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 4:01 pm
Posted by dclt145
Member since Jan 2021
746 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:01 pm to
College basketball has become a joke with all the transfers. It's basically free agency at this point. I read every P6 school except 3 have had at least one transfer this offseason.

Get ready to see it in football as well. P5 schools will be hard recruiting any players that have breakout years as a freshman or sophomore at G5 schools.

Recruiting will be easier on coaches now, they can just use actual game film at the college level and pick off kids who may have been under recruited out of high school.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64692 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

They already get whoever they want

and now they can get even more
quote:

It worked fine for years in baseball

well, for one, there are almost 3 times as many D1 baseball teams compared to football teams. And second, it being a thing in baseball doesn't mean it worked fine in baseball. And lastly, baseball players aren't on full rides to begin with, big difference. Baseball players aren't throwing full rides down the toilet in hope they can find another
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 4:07 pm
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86500 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:08 pm to
I don't know what was wrong with the old rule that you can transfer but you have to sit a year. Why in the world would that be scrapped aside from the fact we're trying to coddle the gen-z social media instant gratification generation?
Posted by metallica81788
NO
Member since Sep 2008
8485 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:13 pm to
Too bad they didn't apply it to that football player two years ago that transferred back home (maybe VaTech) to help his mom with cancer care.

...yet let Justin Fields get a waiver the same year.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86500 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

football player two years ago that transferred back home (maybe VaTech) to help his mom with cancer care.

...yet let Justin Fields get a waiver the same year.


the same year as fields we had another guy, also transferring from UGA (luke ford), want to tranfser back to his home state to be closer to his ailing grandfather. He was denied. Fields didn't get enough PT as a true freshman as he would have liked and was granted. It's a fricking sham.
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:21 pm to
I don't like this at all. From my experience as a collegiate athlete 10-14 years ago, the freshmen who would come in and would not immediately start and complain about it were dime a dozen. It's a good thing they didn't leave.

A lot of kids take a while to whip into shape to where they can become coachable. My collegiate athletic days were at the dawn of social media, nothing like it is now, so less "look at me" social media clout chasers. I couldn't imagine what it would be like today.

Gary Patterson was a tough coach to play for, tough but fair. With free for all transfers I bet a lot of guys who I witnessed receive his wrath as freshmen would have transferred out.

I think those who have most to lose here are coaches who are no nonsense, hard nosed types who don't put up with bullshite. You're going to have athletes who would rather play for a coach who is their friend rather than coach because they don't want their fee fees hurt.
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22786 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:26 pm to
Of you're a good program, you can reap the benefits of this. If you're shitryz you're going to be shitty for a long time now.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64692 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

the same year as fields we had another guy, also transferring from UGA (luke ford), want to tranfser back to his home state to be closer to his ailing grandfather. He was denied. Fields didn't get enough PT as a true freshman as he would have liked and was granted. It's a fricking sham.


Tate Martell, from Nevada, commited and decmottied from Washington, committed and decomitted from A&M, enrolled at OSU, transferred from Ohio State to Miami without sitting out and is now going to get to transfer again without sitting out. But the NCAA would let Kolton Houston play football for three years because a steroid injection for an injury in high school and traces still weren't flushing his system. The NCAA denied Kerwin Okoro a hardship waiver when he tried to transfer from Iowa St to Rutgers (he's from NY) to help his mother after his father died of a stroke and his brother of cancer in the span of two months . The NCAA denied Terry Henderson a 6th year because he played seven minutes of a season before a serious injury ended his season. Seven minutes was enough to cost him his last year of eligiblity. Bryan Burnham of Boise St missed an entire year to illness (I think it was mono) then tore his ACL in the season opener another year. Waiver for 6th year denied, appeal denied. But hey, if you're an elite prospect not getting enough playing time, by all means, create a bullshite hardship the NCAA will rubber-stamp your waiver and send you on your way
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 4:39 pm
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56538 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Good


why
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56538 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

It worked fine for years in baseball



...that was a sport with "no" scholarships.

quote:

They already get whoever they want



You don't see the difference between cherry picking players in high school vs. cherry picking players from other programs? Even professional sports have the ability to lock down players for a few years at a time.

Most importantly, this is terrible for fans of the game and the game itself.
Posted by TheeRealCarolina
Member since Aug 2018
17925 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 5:18 pm to
Their benefits should be taxed. Either you’re an amateur and do it without compensation or you are compensated and get taxed like an adult.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34110 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

I don't know what was wrong with the old rule that you can transfer but you have to sit a year.

It's racist. If Homie has to sit a year, Whitey's just holding him down.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20770 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

I don't know what was wrong with the old rule that you can transfer but you have to sit a year. Why in the world would that be scrapped aside from the fact we're trying to coddle the gen-z social media instant gratification generation?


The National college football media, who are miserable fricks that for some reason hate the sport and want everything changed, have been pushing for this for years.

Should’ve been common sense reform around the waiver process. That is that was needed.
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 7:01 pm
Posted by BamaDude06
GOATville20
Member since Jan 2007
3475 posts
Posted on 4/14/21 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

This is good for programs like Alabama and blue-chip prospects who will have dozens of offers. For the vast majority of programs and players, this is going to work out very poorly for them



Alabama has taken very few transfers under Saban, mainly because they just don't have room for them. Guys like Jake Coker and Landon Dickerson are rare exceptions (and ironically both transferred from FSU).

quote:

the same year as fields we had another guy, also transferring from UGA (luke ford), want to tranfser back to his home state to be closer to his ailing grandfather. He was denied. Fields didn't get enough PT as a true freshman as he would have liked and was granted. It's a fricking sham.


And there's the reason for the change. No matter what if you stuck with the wavier system someone was always going to be screwed in the eyes of many. The NCAA is now just saying "go ahead and transfer for whatever reason, but be careful because if you use it to early you are going to have to sit later"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram