Started By
Message

re: **The Official 2011 NFL Draft Thread**

Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:27 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475816 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

If Mark Ingrzm can produce like a Ray Rice then everyone's going to be happy.

i would be

ingram doesn't have rice's elusivity or speed, so i doubt he can produce the big plays rice does

and rice was picked in the 2nd
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

are you counting 1st and 2nd round RBs who ended up on other teams as 1st and 2nd round RBs for this argument? like in 2009, you're counting thomas jones as a "1st round RB" ?


Does it matter if he switched teams? He has clearly lived up to being a 1st round draft pick.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475816 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

Peterson, Johnson, MJD

end of argument right now, and MJD is falling off

quote:

Mendenhall and Rice

mendenhall? frick no

rice? on the verge, but wasn't that great last year. only 4.0 ypc

quote:

Charles if you count 3rd round backs.

he can't carry the load himself...at least he's not proven to be able to. i do love me some charles

quote:

McFadden and McCoy if they have repeat years.

huge if for DMac. he was pretty useless his first 2 years and was the highest paid RB in the NFL not named Reggie Bush

McCoy barely got 1k yards
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475816 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

Does it matter if he switched teams?

yes, it does

the saints should have signed thomas jones (a "1st round RB") last offseason

quote:

He has clearly lived up to being a 1st round draft pick

so if ingram fails for the saints, but works out for another team, this means the saints moves tonight were good, in hindsight?
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42107 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:33 pm to
Wow we are using elusivity instead of elusiveness now or something?

Either way I think he can be a similar back. Peyton Hillis, Ray Rice, Michael Turner ish.


quote:

and rice was picked in the 2nd


Again, if he produces, does it matter?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475816 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

Peyton Hillis, Ray Rice, Michael Turner ish.

these 3 guys are all pretty differnet

rice is a small slasher/speed back without much power

hillis is a low COG pounder

turner is an upright big back who used to have homerun speed
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475816 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:42 pm to
let me add this. charles and rice had a rare factor (gamebreaking speed and elusivity). DMac and AD did as well.

ingram lacks this rare trait. it devalues him
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42107 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

Peyton Hillis, Ray Rice, Michael Turner ish
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

bush is not a real piece in our running game, so i doubt he has any effect on anything to do with ingram

True, but he is added depth if other guys were to go down.

But I agree.
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

so if ingram fails for the saints, but works out for another team, this means the saints moves tonight were good, in hindsight?


If Ingram has a similar career to Jones then it means the Saints made the right pick but failed in developing him or failed putting him in the right system.

quote:

rice? on the verge, but wasn't that great last year. only 4.0 ypc


4.0 ypc is good. Add in his pass catching and he is a franchise type RB.

quote:

he can't carry the load himself...at least he's not proven to be able to. i do love me some charles


For a full season he hasn't. But for most of the 2nd half of 09 and at times last year he proved he could.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42107 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:51 pm to
quote:



ingram lacks this rare trait. it devalues him


Vision. Power. Knack for the Endzone.
A pro scout might say something different but he has some rare traits.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:55 pm to
I'm just going to throw this out there. I am pissed we didn't get an elite 5 tech. Belichick made a mistake and it cost us pretty badly.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475816 posts
Posted on 4/28/11 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

Vision. Power.

not rare for power backs in NFL systems. requirements

quote:

Knack for the Endzone.

dude....dude
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89507 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 7:42 am to
The Saints gave me the biggest boner last night.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42107 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:30 am to
quote:

dude....dude


Don't dude me, when you are dropping terms like elusivity around here.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475816 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:33 am to
there isn't really such a thing. that's a product of good fortune (to end up near the end zone a bunch)

it reminds me of the gator fans who used to say tebow was a better runner than vince b/c he had more rushing TDs
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42107 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:42 am to
Well Ridley is the only person you came up with that fit your "we could have waited till the 5th to get a guy just as good" argument. Seeing that he played for the Tigers it wasn't a hard one to pull. It shows that you, like me, are not a pro scout. So there aren't guys in the later rounds that you have truly evaluated, you just know that there is some that you think are as good as Ingram. (You under value 1st round RB's and yet look away from the large number of 5th to 7th round duds) That's flawed reasoning that really doesn't hold any water in a serious debate.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475816 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Well Ridley is the only person you came up with that fit your "we could have waited till the 5th to get a guy just as good" argument.

that's off the top of my head

there are plenty of guys who were productive in college who have similar physical ability

bradford, royster, helu, evans. i'm curious if williams falls to the late 2nd
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42107 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 8:57 am to
quote:

bradford, royster, helu, evans. i'm curious if williams falls to the late 2nd


I'm sorry but Royster and Helu Jr aren't even in the same ballpark. They are the definition of the run of the mill/possibly be a back-up/highest potential is 3rd down back.

Jordan Todman is a guy that would be a good comparison IMO. Though he's not as strong and elusive and I doubt he will be around in the 5th.
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89507 posts
Posted on 4/29/11 at 9:36 am to
They got Ivory as an undrafted free agency. They didn't want to have to chance it anymore. They went with what they thought was stability. Not to mention they completely solidified their backfield and bolstered the DLine with Cam Jordan.
Jump to page
Page First 73 74 75 76 77 ... 88
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 75 of 88Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram