- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Angel Reese "mebounds" myth dispelled
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:09 am to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:09 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
This should be 4 mebounds in 1 possession.
At 7 games with 0, 17 with 1, and 7 with 2, we can’t be grabbing too many more if the accurate total is 54.
Who is keeping this stat?
You posted a clip from last season, when Angel was playing for Chicago.
3
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:11 am to SEC Doctor
quote:
You posted a clip from last season, when Angel was playing for Chicago.
Dont point that fact out. Youre gonna upset Lunchbox
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:12 am to sgallo3
quote:
Dont point that fact out. Youre gonna upset Lunchbox
Didn't bother me at all.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:14 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Absolutely pathetic attempt at deflection
Clearly....
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:16 am to sgallo3
quote:
You saw a lot of rebounds off her own shots in that clip? Theres barely any
There's two on one play
The point of teh clips posted are that they are very selective in how they count her rebounds because they are aware f the whole mebound stuff so that dorks like you can keep telling us how impressed we're supposed to be that she is seemingly the only player allowed to rebound for her team. Just watch the videos. She takes rebounds from her own players and rarely boxes out or even has to jump. It is elite stat paddingPosted on 8/27/26 at 10:18 am to sgallo3
quote:
Dont point that fact out. Youre gonna upset Lunchbox
Why did my post get downvoted?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:18 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
The point of teh clips posted are that they are very selective in how they count her rebounds
That clip the guy posted from last season had 0 affect on her rebounds this year, despite him counting it as part of her 54 rebounds this year in his post.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:19 am to SEC Doctor
quote:
Why did my post get downvoted?
He's very emotional about this. Facts hurt his feelings
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:20 am to sgallo3
quote:
That clip the guy posted from last season had 0 affect on her rebounds this year, despite him counting it as part of her 54 rebounds this year in his post.
The lemmings are so desperate to discount Angel's stats, it is hilarious.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:29 am to SEC Doctor
quote:you’re getting in the way of the circlejerk
Why did my post get downvoted?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:33 am to DownSouthCrawfish
It's a sad state of affairs that WNBA threads last this long
Posted on 8/27/26 at 10:44 am to DMagic
quote:
It's a sad state of affairs that WNBA threads last this long
Wait until the World Cup gets going.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 11:02 am to SEC Doctor
quote:
Wait until the World Cup gets going
College football is almost here. We’ll all be okay after that
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:20 pm to SEC Doctor
quote:I suspected this was the case and nearly made reference to it in the post.
You posted a clip from last season, when Angel was playing for Chicago.
I don’t think it changes a single thing in the post.
Would you like to discuss it?
I find it very difficult to believe the numbers based on video.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:23 pm to sgallo3
quote:Kind of
That clip the guy posted from last season had 0 affect on her rebounds this year, despite him counting it as part of her 54 rebounds this year in his post.
It was just the first clip that came up. It’s a phenomenon we’ve observed more than once and I just needed an example of my point. I wasn’t necessarily claiming those 4 are part of the 54. I should have gone ahead and mentioned it in the post.
Maybe let’s apply those 4 to her numbers from last season or whatever season it’s from. The overall point is it does not seem possible that she only has 54 this year based on what we know about her game.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:36 pm to SEC Doctor
quote:How many mebounds did she have last season?
You posted a clip from last season, when Angel was playing for Chicago.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:45 pm to SEC Doctor
How many on that top 10 look like sloths?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 2:18 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I suspected this was the case and nearly made reference to it in the post.
I don’t think it changes a single thing in the post.
Would you like to discuss it?
I find it very difficult to believe the numbers based on video.
The numbers are what they are, you can believe whatever you want. Posting a clip from last season to challenge the stats from this year is just dumb.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 2:22 pm to SEC Doctor
Don’t be a count
How many did she have last year? I don’t believe the numbers but I’d like to look into it, as I could be terribly wrong.
I’ll concede that I got lazy not explaining that post a little better. Now will you work with me or not?
How many did she have last year? I don’t believe the numbers but I’d like to look into it, as I could be terribly wrong.
I’ll concede that I got lazy not explaining that post a little better. Now will you work with me or not?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 2:23 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Don’t be a count
How many did she have last year? I don’t believe the numbers but I’d like to look into it, as I could be terribly wrong.
I’ll concede that I got lazy not explaining that post a little better. Now will you work with me or not?
I have no idea how many she had last season, just saw the chart posted for this year. Not sure why that matters.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News