Started By
Message

re: Teams were not as deep or talented in MJ’s era.

Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44830 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

VADawg, are you saying that Lebron is a better defender than Jordan?


One on one, no. Although he was damn good and criminally underrated at it from about 2009-2012. He made MVP Derrick Rose disappear from the conference finals in his first year in Miami. LeBron is an awesome free safety though and is a better shot blocker.

It isn't some mile wide gap like Jordan fanboys claim it to be.
This post was edited on 5/31/18 at 12:37 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95120 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:30 pm to
For the nba to be equal in depth from a statisctal standpoint, there would need to be 35 teams to be on par with MJs first 3 titles


There would need to be 39 teams to be on par with mjs sexond 3 peat
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110821 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

VADawg, are you saying that Lebron is a better defender than Jordan?

I read the post you replied to, the poster never said anything of the sort
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20015 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:33 pm to
Lebron is a better pure basketball player than MJ, but he acts like a bitch which makes people not like him.

He will never be as popular as MJ and thus will never win over the public perception.

Lebron also chased rings, and was clearly worried about his legacy, in comparison to MJ, which is unflattering.

People make this topic more complicated than it is. It is all about perception, not actual skill level.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110821 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Lebron also chased rings, and was clearly worried about his legacy, in comparison to MJ, which is unflattering.

MJ was taking people out during his HOF speech. I'm not sure there's ever been an athlete more concerned about his legacy than MJ. There's nothing wrong with that generally speaking.
Posted by BCMCubs
Colorado
Member since Nov 2011
22146 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

least you're honest about how irrational you are. Most MJ fanboys won't admit that


Totally irrational. Dont care. Ill ride for MJ until I die
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162217 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

When you add franchises, it dilutes the talent pool. It's science.


People who are fringe players today could probably be impact players then

Athletes are much more skilled now
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110821 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

When you add franchises, it dilutes the talent pool. It's science.
Same question, are you factoring in how much more good European talent we have nowadays?

Posted by Kevin TheRant
Member since Nov 2010
1724 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

I read the post you replied to, the poster never said anything of the sort


He mentioned Lebrons blocking ability against Igoudala. Which prompted me to ASK the question.

Is that what you are talking about?
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20015 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Anyway 5.2 billion/27 is 192.5 million per team 6.8 billion/30 is 226.6 million per team So you fail my friend


Are you seriously trying to extrapolate NBA team by global population? Who cares how many more Indians and Chinese we have in the world now that’s not the NBA talent pool

Until you provide anything more than lazy math you are the one that is failing.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

People who are fringe players today could probably be impact players then

Athletes are much more skilled now


This is what I tell folks all the time. What was revolutionary talent awhile back is minimum requirements to ride the bench these days.
Posted by Kevin TheRant
Member since Nov 2010
1724 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:44 pm to
Do we agree that Jordan is/was a better defender?
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Who cares how many more Indians and Chinese we have in the world now


You seriously g2 sit there and act like international talent hasn't gotten exponentially better since MJ?
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20015 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

MJ was taking people out during his HOF speech. I'm not sure there's ever been an athlete more concerned about his legacy than MJ. There's nothing wrong with that generally speaking.


I am saying that he is chasing a specific legacy, which comes off as lame

MJ has more confidence than Lebron, people notice that. Because just using the eye test Lebron is clearly a superior basketball player. So there has to be something less tangible when discussing the better player.
Posted by Clockwatcher68
Youngsville
Member since May 2006
6903 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

MJ played in a diluted league prior to a big European movement of players. There were a few but not many. That is why players like Sabonis and Kukoc stayed over seas for a few years prior to playing the the NBA.

Expansion happened within three to four years of each of th Bulls three peats.

MJ was a great player. Definitely top five with Lebron, Magic, Bird, and either Kareem or Russell. But his untouchable status was a product of Nike and ESPN.


LOL. One excuse after another on why Jordan always delivered, and James is about to be 3-6.
Posted by wasteland
City of peace
Member since Apr 2011
5600 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:49 pm to
Teams are definitely more talented now. Would guys like Steve Kerr or John Paxson even make a team in today's NBA?
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44830 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Because just using the eye test Lebron is clearly a superior basketball player


/thread
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44830 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Do we agree that Jordan is/was a better defender


One on one, sure. Playing free safety and blocking shots, no.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20015 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

You seriously g2 sit there and act like international talent hasn't gotten exponentially better since MJ?


Yep. I’m not arguing the talent pool isn’t deeper, I am arguing that the countries driving total world population growth don’t produce NBA talent.

Developed countries, where NBA players come from are not growing at the rates of the entire world, so it’s a poor basis of extrapolation.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95120 posts
Posted on 5/31/18 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Are you seriously trying to extrapolate NBA team by global population? Who cares how many more Indians and Chinese we have in the world now that’s not the NBA talent pool

Until you provide anything more than lazy math you are the one that is failing.

Well to start, the international talent is now a much bigger part of the game


But, you were very lazy and stupid to hinge your argument without first looking up a very easy number which will now make you look foolish, more foolish than you already are


US population for MJS first 3 peat with 27 teams

249 million


249mil/27 = 9,222,222 per team

Us pop for his 2nd three peat with 30 teams

269mil/30 = 8,966,666 per team





Lebron

309mil/30 = 10,300,000 per team



So once again, still clearly deeper
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram