- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:09 pm to NOBODY
I will object or approve. I don't give a frick really.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:10 pm to GynoSandberg
i would have to change my team name, which i cant do. What about Stephen Jackson? He is eligible at every position except C and PG. I would be open to dealing Johnson, but it would take alot to get him.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:18 pm to stout
-I will object or approve. I don't give a frick really.
-I vetoed b/c this makes LE's team better
Do we need anymore proof that the veto power should go away
-I vetoed b/c this makes LE's team better
Do we need anymore proof that the veto power should go away
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:19 pm to TigerPhan27
-Do we need anymore proof that the veto power should go away
Good point
Good point
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:23 pm to PortCityTiger24
I agree with knat thst the principles of the loan (vc and jamison for bosh and beasely) are fine... shite even if rick throws in miller or deng or something for waiver wire fodder then fine.
But 4 fodder guys that are hurt for 4 guys that play is too much.
But 4 fodder guys that are hurt for 4 guys that play is too much.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:27 pm to NOBODY
I think its simpler than that - if you vetoed Ron's trade then you must veto this trade.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:31 pm to cwill
agreed, but since i didn't veto ron's i won't veto this
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:36 pm to PortCityTiger24
Rons trade would have left rick in better shape for next year than this one
Posted on 1/14/09 at 4:19 pm to NOBODY
i agree
Posted on 1/14/09 at 4:21 pm to rmc
that's why i didn't veto ron's and vetoed this one the 1st time, but then realized that it's your team. i approved this trade, just like ron's.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 4:24 pm to rmc
awesome! now edit.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 4:42 pm to PortCityTiger24
Rmc bringing da real name booms
This post was edited on 1/14/09 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 1/14/09 at 4:50 pm to rmc
Fwiw I am not scared of shite.
I am smart enough to not want to see one team fleece the frick out of another and give me more competition and not even pay for it long term.
I don't give a shite if its collusion or not. The intent may npt be there but the result is the same.
I am smart enough to not want to see one team fleece the frick out of another and give me more competition and not even pay for it long term.
I don't give a shite if its collusion or not. The intent may npt be there but the result is the same.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:00 pm to rmc
That was a kige-esque "fixed it for you" there bub
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:03 pm to rmc
wait is this the exact same trade that was just vetoed?
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:06 pm to NOBODY
quote:
Rons trade would have left rick in better shape for next year than this one
maybe, maybe not.
the fact of the matter was Rick was sending Ron much better players, and Ron was giving up much less.
and port said he would vote differently, which was the only reason i re sent the offer to Rick.
and i was hoping Ryan would see how bad of a commish he is being by vetoing this but backing every trade in every league that was lopsided because "its a keeper league"
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:07 pm to Lester Earl
i think it's bullshite that the trade was vetoed and then the exact same trade was re-proposed without any changes being made. what's to keep people from just redoing and redoing trades until people get tired of bitching or protesting?
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:08 pm to NOBODY
quote:
But 4 fodder guys that are hurt for 4 guys that play is too much.
ian, he is trading me Hinirich, who picked off waivers 3 days ago, and Big Z, who is hurt for another 2.5 weeks.
plus Jamison who was just hurt. and Deng who was JUST hurt.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:09 pm to LSU Fan 90812
Yes. The same exact trade.
I like how marle acted like it was no big deal if it got vetoed to throw us off the scent.
We veto it and he wigs out and tries to guilt people into not vetoing again
I like how marle acted like it was no big deal if it got vetoed to throw us off the scent.
We veto it and he wigs out and tries to guilt people into not vetoing again
Page 21 of 55
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News