- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:28 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
Port changed his vote for fear of looking "uncool" essentially.
how does this make me look "uncool"? i didn't veto ron's trade, so i thought it would be unfair to veto this. is that really that hard to understand? i mean really?
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:29 pm to rmc
sorry, if you allow vetoing then you allow moronic decisions to veto. lie in the bed you make
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:30 pm to rmc
You giving all the players of any value you have to one team doesn't make it easier for me to finish first.
It just makes it easier to beat you
It just makes it easier to beat you
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:32 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
how does this make me look "uncool"? i didn't veto ron's trade, so i thought it would be unfair to veto this. is that really that hard to understand? i mean really?
the point is that you were coerced into changing your vote.
and it happened all around the time everybody was tossing accusations of being scared. it seemed pretty obvious to me and nobes noticed a similar phenomena.
i don't care what happened, this trade was vetoed once. once is enough. if you want to re-propose the trade, then change the principles.
that's it.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:42 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
the point is that you were coerced into changing your vote.
and it happened all around the time everybody was tossing accusations of being scared. it seemed pretty obvious to me and nobes noticed a similar phenomena.
honestly dude, i sat back and said to myself "who really gives a frick"
read this
quote:
again bitch, i didn't even veto ron's trade because i could see where you improved next year, though it was lopsided as frick. in this trade, you don't improve. it has nothing to do with les getting better. not for me, anyways. if you are going to bitch, then frick it, run it through again and i won't veto. if you think beasley and bosh is an improvement, and if you think that giving up half of your team is of because your playing for next year, then do it.
that was to rick
This was before lester even posted today. I was wrong in vetoing a trade because I, key word here, I thought it was bad for SOMEONE ELSE and their team. WE SHOULDN'T VETO TRADES BECAUSE OF THIS. I didn't veto Ron's trade, and I was wrong for vetoing this. I, again I changed my mind before les even posted today. I am not going to sit here and argue with you figs about this. If you can't understand that I thought it was wrong of me to veto this one when I didn't veto the last one, that's on you. I hope the bold and caps helps. "looking cool" is about the last thing I have to worry about with this cast.
This post was edited on 1/14/09 at 5:46 pm
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:49 pm to PortCityTiger24
I still think you're cool Port
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:54 pm to PortCityTiger24
port, for someone who's not worried about looking cool, you sure put a lot of thought and effort into defending yourself...
(
)
(
)Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:12 pm to LSU Fan 90812
i was going to tell you to get a life, but with the whole music gig and at one point being a radio host, i didn't think that would be verry effective.
ETA I was being serious. i just read it and i could see how it could be taken the wrong way.
ETA I was being serious. i just read it and i could see how it could be taken the wrong way.
This post was edited on 1/14/09 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:21 pm to rmc
Looks like one more vote and this sad little misadventure will be over.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:23 pm to rmc
i was sincere about that.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:26 pm to PortCityTiger24
rmc, me and port are buds. you best respek!
btw, my vote is supposed to be an object but i accidentally hit approve, so this farce should be over already
btw, my vote is supposed to be an object but i accidentally hit approve, so this farce should be over already
Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:27 pm to LSU Fan 90812
yea i vetoed so that made up for port being a flip flopper
Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:33 pm to rmc
Rick with a series of shrewd moves, you could turn those same six players into more picks and better keeperd. Especially once the trade deadline nears.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:35 pm to NOBODY
I can't believe grown men are still arguing over this.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:38 pm to rmc
I guess TDBBL is even more serious.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:38 pm to stout
Shouldn't u be telling the ot how much the night crew sucks right now?
Posted on 1/14/09 at 6:40 pm to NOBODY
That's later
Posted on 1/14/09 at 7:13 pm to rmc
y'all did it to yourselves. If you and LE had changed the trade even slightly, neither of us would have objected.
i made this pretty clear before it was reproposed.
i made this pretty clear before it was reproposed.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 7:28 pm to rmc
cool, rmc has a stutter in his typing.
Page 23 of 55
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News