- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TDBBL Week 12 Preview
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:09 pm to LSU Fan 90812
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:09 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
i think it's bullshite that the trade was vetoed and then the exact same trade was re-proposed without any changes being made. what's to keep people from just redoing and redoing trades until people get tired of bitching or protesting?
why not re propose it when someone said he would change their vote after rationally thinking about it?
1
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:10 pm to rmc
i accidentally hit approve instead of evaluate. don't know what to do now.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:11 pm to NOBODY
quote:
I like how marle acted like it was no big deal if it got vetoed to throw us off the scent.
It's no big deal. I was semi reluctant to even do it in the first place.
Andy said he wouldnt veto the trade.
whats so hard to understand?
and what do i have to gain by "throwing you off of a scent"?
nothing.
and I havent wigged out any, actually.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:12 pm to rmc
quote:
. Ron, Nobes and Cwill have vetoed so far.
right. Out of spite/being scared
and Ryan will veto because that last one got vetoed.
no reasoning other than that
not because the trade was so ungodly fair or one sided.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:12 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
why not re propose it when someone said he would change their vote after rationally thinking about it?
because then it turns into a fricking arguing match over who can whine and bitch and cajole people into changing their votes like this is the US Senate.
You get one chance to get your trade passed as is. If it happens to get vetoed, you should have to change SOMETHING to get it re-passed.
I want this made into a rule.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:14 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
because then it turns into a fricking arguing match over who can whine and bitch and cajole people into changing their votes like this is the US Senate.
I was busy all morning, or i could have broken it down earlier for those that cannot think for themselves.
I didnt BEG anyone to change their vote. Port offered. Come on, dont act like this is one big doing by me by begging for people to change their votes. Thats crazy. Give me some credit
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:14 pm to LSU Fan 90812
this should be an automatic veto at this point. the trade was already vetoed. you can't run the same trade and just hope someome forgets to vote or stout changes his mind b/c he doesn't care
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:15 pm to TigerPhan27
Port cares, and he changed his vote.
And I was hoping Ryan would consider how much of a douche and hypocrite he is for vetoing this, when each trade should be looked at by a trade by trade basis.
And I was hoping Ryan would consider how much of a douche and hypocrite he is for vetoing this, when each trade should be looked at by a trade by trade basis.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:16 pm to Lester Earl
it's still BS, why would he change his vote?
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:17 pm to TigerPhan27
Actually i will now make my 1st ever veto
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:17 pm to TigerPhan27
Im not sure. Ask him.
Ron prob thinks ive been on AIM with him all day.
Ron prob thinks ive been on AIM with him all day.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:18 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
this should be an automatic veto at this point. the trade was already vetoed. you can't run the same trade and just hope someome forgets to vote or stout changes his mind b/c he doesn't care
I agree Knat. Something needs to change for this trade to be re-assessed.
Port changed his vote for fear of looking "uncool" essentially.
Stout because he doesn't give a shite.
No trade should ever be proposed the same twice. I feel very strongly about this.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:18 pm to TigerPhan27
Ron and NOBES will be by anytime now to pat you on your back, squire.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:19 pm to Lester Earl
Port didn't rationally change his mind. You appealed to his masculinity by saying he is scared.
It worked on him.
Sorry, my brain trumps my pride here. This is a bullshite trade and you know it.
I am not scared anyway...its fricking fantasy basketball. Anyone that was in tdfl knows I can handle losing.
But you aren't going to convince me to let a bullshite trade to go through because I will look scared otherwise.
It worked on him.
Sorry, my brain trumps my pride here. This is a bullshite trade and you know it.
I am not scared anyway...its fricking fantasy basketball. Anyone that was in tdfl knows I can handle losing.
But you aren't going to convince me to let a bullshite trade to go through because I will look scared otherwise.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:20 pm to Lester Earl
And I'm emailing RMCC to make sure my approved vote changes to object. that should be 4.
LE, i told you before you re-proposed that I felt this way. You should've changed something minor.
LE, i told you before you re-proposed that I felt this way. You should've changed something minor.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:20 pm to Lester Earl
Sorry LE, this is BS you can't just keep trying to get the same trade through, although i thought it should be allowed I'm no vetoing b/c this crap would be bad for the league
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:21 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
Sorry LE, this is BS you can't just keep trying to get the same trade through, although i thought it should be allowed I'm no vetoing b/c this crap would be bad for the league
exactly. you can't keep cramming trades through in hopes that people lose interest or the uproar dies down.
And regardless of the outcome of this veto, I want an amendment to the league constitution saying that once vetoed, no trade can be re-proposed.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:22 pm to LSU Fan 90812
agreed
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:24 pm to rmc
i'll be less inclined to veto that.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 5:25 pm to rmc
Rick, why do you insist on being bad again next year?
Page 22 of 55
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News