- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:18 pm to GynoSandberg
gyno trade me a pg
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:19 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
Ronnie's trade wasn't vetoed until everyone talked about on here and convienced each other to veto it.
right.
which is what needed to be done.
quote:
Your trade was vetoed with no disccusion whatsoever
based on what happened with his trade only. I dont think anyone even looked at it in depth.
I know Ryan didnt for sure. Because he said something to the affect of "if the other trade got vetoed, so should this one".
I dont see why we cant handle it on a trade by trade basis. Every trade should be a new case.
quote:
So if there was collusion involved it was obivously in the Ronnie trade
I dont see how i could collude when everything i thought about the trade was out in the open.
Some people cant think for themselves. It happened in that case with the first trade, and its obviously happening in this case.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:20 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
gyno trade me a pg
williams for granger?
would you like harris?
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:21 pm to Lester Earl
-Some people cant think for themselves
Which is why the vetoing is stupid, because all it takes is one guy who doesn't want to trade to happen to come on here and stir everyone up, get them to veto it and now every trade that looks the same just gets vetoed and nothing gets done
Which is why the vetoing is stupid, because all it takes is one guy who doesn't want to trade to happen to come on here and stir everyone up, get them to veto it and now every trade that looks the same just gets vetoed and nothing gets done
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:22 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
well the fact that you were the ringleader in all of this bullshite 3 weeks ago
I will never be part of a ring lead by LE..FWIW, IMHO, etc.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:23 pm to rmc
quote:
Damn cwill... I just got through explaining why someone need a couple powers of attorney to avoid likely interdiction... harsh man. Harsh.
I thought you would appreciate that....you being a country esquire.
This post was edited on 1/14/09 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:23 pm to GynoSandberg
i would like harris
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:23 pm to GynoSandberg
I don't want to take on yi with no benefit coming my way. Dude could be out for 6 weeks.
Harris has had a hard time staying on the court lately too
Harris has had a hard time staying on the court lately too
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:24 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
cwill, you ever going to email me back brah?
I'm going to sit out of the trade pool this week, see how I fare, measure that against how much season is left and then consider possible trades.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:25 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
Which is why the vetoing is stupid, because all it takes is one guy who doesn't want to trade to happen to come on here and stir everyone up, get them to veto it and now every trade that looks the same just gets vetoed and nothing gets done
Right, I agree 100% with you.
But on another note though, if that other trade had gone through, we would have been opening the door for something more "serious".
When I accepted this trade, I had a feeling people would veto it, just because of what happened to the last one. I didnt expect 6 votes, because if you look at it in depth, its not that bad. I certainly didnt think someone like Ryan would change his mind just because of what happened to the last one, being the commish and all. I knew people like Ron and NOBES would veto it, but i honestly didnt expect a total veto.
But I can live with it, because I think we set a good precedent by not allowing the first one. I'd rather be on that side than the other side with the flood gates opened.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:25 pm to NOBODY
quote:
I don't want to take on yi with no benefit coming my way. Dude could be out for 6 weeks.
Harris has had a hard time staying on the court lately too
which is why i was trying to deal him to a team that could afford to sit on him
and harris is just fine nobes dont give me that.... that wasnt really a good deal
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:26 pm to cwill
quote:
I will never be part of a ring lead by LE..FWIW, IMHO, etc.
YOU MEAN I DIDNT COLLUDE WITH YOU?!@?!
OMG!!!!!!
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:28 pm to cwill
maybe i should just sell and say frick this league and wait until next year
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:29 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
But I can live with it, because I think we set a good precedent by not allowing the first one. I'd rather be on that side than the other side with the flood gates opened.
Yup...it looks like the real problem may be that rmc has no fricking clue what he is doing when it comes to basketball.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:29 pm to GynoSandberg
Gyno, no one is gonna give you a healthy player for a hurt one and expect nothing in return.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:30 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
maybe i should just sell and say frick this league and wait until next year
Both trades were vetoed so quit whining and threatening to take your ball and go home.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:35 pm to GynoSandberg
gyno, what you want for harris?
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:37 pm to cwill
I know I didn't stutter when I vetoed this shite.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 2:37 pm to cwill
cwill i bet you have the personality of a brick wall in real life dont you
Page 19 of 55
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News