- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Some more Steph Curry ridiculousness
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:24 pm to BayouBengals03
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:24 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
I like this stat.
I also like it because Jordan blows the rest of those guys out of the water in it.
Jordan's usage rate that year was 38.3%. Curry's usage this year is 32.7%. It stands to reason that if Curry's usage was increased to MJ's level in 86-87, his points per 100 possessions would be 50.9. That is absurd.
1
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:25 pm to slackster
Damn
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:26 pm to bgtiger
quote:
Get off my lawn, because you don't own one, but want to tell me what grass is a better choice.
I own my own lawn, pendejo. And I hire idiots like you to mow it.
quote:
Still waiting on the elusive explanation of how basketball defenses are complex these days.
Still waiting on you to link where I'm this massive LBJ/Kobe fan boy because I can appreciate the greatness of what Curry is doing on a nightly basis.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:28 pm to bgtiger
quote:
You pukes were probably all on the side of LBJ v Kobe, less than two years ago. Remember LBJ was the GOAT, because he is the newest?
LBJ v Kobe debate? This debate was settled long before 2014.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:29 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Kinda overusing "fanboy"
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:31 pm to bgtiger
quote:This is just getting awkward at this point.
If you watch an NBA game and think that you are watching the effectiveness of a twenty page scouting report, you are crazy.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:31 pm to bgtiger
quote:
Kinda overusing "fanboy"
Using the term ONCE in my exchange with you is "overusing" it?
You really are a clown
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:32 pm to bgtiger
quote:Big O, is that you?
Get off my lawn, because you don't own one, but want to tell me what grass is a better choice.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:37 pm to slackster
quote:
LBJ v Kobe debate? This debate was settled long before 2014.
Shhh, let him keep lashing out
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:37 pm to shel311
LOTS of ESPN and Sports Talk
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:38 pm to bgtiger
quote:Still vomiting up the same comments I told you were wrong earlier, a common them from you.
LOTS of ESPN and Sports Talk
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:39 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
Damn
Obviously it isn't that straight forward, but it gives you a pretty good idea of what kind of production GS gets out of Curry given his usage.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:41 pm to slackster
quote:
LBJ v Kobe debate?
Yet it raged here up until the beginning of this season, with dividing lines being drawn mostly by age of participant.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:41 pm to bgtiger
quote:
LOTS of ESPN and Sports Talk
I do listen to a decent amount of ESPN Radio and Mad Dog radio when I'm on the road. If anything, those guys tend to be biased towards the 80s and 90s more so than today. Not really sure how that can be debated if you're listening.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:41 pm to bgtiger
Everything's about age with you. All age, no substance
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:46 pm to bgtiger
quote:
bgtiger
This is just pathetic.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:47 pm to shel311
Still just hoping you'd show me how current basketball defenses are "sophisticated". More regurgitated bullshite you've heard from sports talk radio, and ESPN. It's so obvious, because you used the exact terms and in the same argument that certain talking heads have.
We can go tit-for-tat with insults, but that's lame. I was just hoping someone could explain the stupid shite they were regurgitating, and none of you did.
You guys win... Until the next GOAT appears. In two to five years from now.
We can go tit-for-tat with insults, but that's lame. I was just hoping someone could explain the stupid shite they were regurgitating, and none of you did.
You guys win... Until the next GOAT appears. In two to five years from now.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:48 pm to bgtiger
quote:I'm guessing it's pretty easily 75%+ in favor of Lebron because most people are logical.
Yet it raged here up until the beginning of this season, with dividing lines being drawn mostly by age of participant.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:49 pm to bgtiger
quote:You can keep saying, it won't magically make it correct.
More regurgitated bull shite you've heard from sports talk radio, and ESPN. It's so obvious, because you used the exact terms and in the same argument that certain talking heads have.
quote:This doesn't even make sense saying it to me, you're really not doing a good job here making logical points.
You guys win... Until the next GOAT appears. In two to five years from now.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 7:49 pm to slackster
Only mad dog Russo is absolutely biased towards the past, and that's annoying too. Morning men, and most other hosts seem to be on the same wave length.
Page 9 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News