Started By
Message

re: Some more Steph Curry ridiculousness

Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:10 pm to
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
11917 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

be sure, none of what Thibodeau preaches is new or revolutionary.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149410 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

in this day and age of schemes that almost rival those of the NFL in their complexity
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:11 pm to
Sounds like you have your mind all made up
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
11917 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

he best players still score the most, affect the game the most, as it has always been


Not as they always have, they're doing it in different ways in today's game.



AND, we've come full circle.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:13 pm to
It's "just some blogger article" when it says something he doesn't agree with, but it's canon if he finds a line he thinks means nothing has changed at all.

This is amazing
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149410 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:14 pm to
Kinda impressive really
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

be sure, none of what Thibodeau preaches is new or revolutionary.
What did it say after that?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

in this day and age of schemes that almost rival those of the NFL in their complexity
Answered my question above.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

AND, we've come full circle.

And because the game is so different, the defenses are more complex.

It's odd, it is a really, really easy concept to grasp and actually see visually if you watch.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91300 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:16 pm to
That is a great article that addresses both the hand check and the zone defense, the latter of which means the net result of the changes were pro-defense.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

That is a great article that addresses both the hand check and the zone defense, the latter of which means the net result of the changes were pro-defense.

Yep that's the best one of the ones I found.

It very clearly illustrates how defenses are more sophisticated and the reason why.

Not sure there's much more we can do. As TBird said, dude won't change his mind, no matter how much evidence we post. Which is funny cause he's accused us of providing nothing, now it's provided, he still doesn't believe, and he himself hasn't provided a nugget of evidence for his point on the other end.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91300 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

Not sure there's much more we can do. As TBird said, dude won't change his mind, no matter how much evidence we post.


Hope he is just a troll and I've wasted an hour or so falling for it.
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
11917 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:21 pm to
Literally every article cited has at least one or two caveats that let you know that all the hype they proclaim is not really new, and has been practiced for years.


Help defense, doubling a non ball handler or big man, still leaves a man open as it fricking always has, and only changes who has to find the open man. Which, purely on the face of this subject, seems to have a much more effective and much more numbers gathering sound to it for guards now, than the inside out game of the past.

It probably also helps someone like Curry that almost all of his starting five can shoot the three to some degree. Really spaces out the floor to five defenders, versus, double the big man and find the other shooter days.


Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92902 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Thanks to analytics, we now know that the long two-point shot is one of the worst shots you can take in the NBA. No one knew this back when MJ played.


I was in high school when MJ played and every coach I had would lose it when we took long 2s so I don't buy this for a minute.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

hype


There it is, gents

Have a good night. We can all go home.
This post was edited on 2/29/16 at 8:24 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Literally every article cited has at least one or two caveats that let you know that all the hype they proclaim is not really new, and has been practiced for years.

THey literally also talk about how much more complex and sophisticated today.

Or better said, they literally say the complete opposite of what you're claiming.

quote:

Help defense, doubling a non ball handler or big man, still leaves a man open as it fricking always has, and only changes who has to find the open man. Which, purely on the face of this subject, seems to have a much more effective and much more numbers gathering sound to it for guards now, than the inside out game of the past.

Read the one that talks about hand checking, then get back to me. If you don't see how it's different and more complex, you have zero reading comprehension, it's basically that simple.

quote:

It probably also helps someone like Curry that almost all of his starting five can shoot the three to some degree. Really spaces out the floor to five defenders, versus, double the big man and find the other shooter days.

So floor spacing is better nowadays for not just GS, but most teams? Sounds like your defense better be more sophisticated to try and combat it.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112623 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

There it is, gents

Have a good night. We can all go home.

I mean, he's talking up articles I posted that directly talk about how much more complex defenses are today, but using that as his evidence, despite it being a 180 from what he's saying.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

I mean, he's talking up articles I posted that directly talk about how much more complex defenses are today, but using that as his evidence, despite it being a 180 from what he's saying.


It's a display of willful ignorance as marvel-worthy as Curry's gamewinner, tbh

Like WCA said, it's impressive.
This post was edited on 2/29/16 at 8:27 pm
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17360 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

Not sure there's much more we can do. As TBird said, dude won't change his mind, no matter how much evidence we post


You are trying to discuss strategy with someone who actually said "scouting reports are vastly unimportant".
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

"scouting reports are vastly unimportant"


So many gems of ridiculousness, so little time to address them all
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram