- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:15 am to WestCoastAg
The problem isn’t the luxury tax or teams going over it, it’s the teams that receive revenue sharing having zero incentive to reinvest that money in the roster
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:20 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
its the different side of the same problem. but yes, there needs to be stricter rules on what the lower 15 market teams can do with their revenue sharing money
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:22 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
teams that receive revenue sharing having zero incentive to reinvest that money in the roster
They have changed it, and are putting pressure on teams who get luxury cash and still put out shite rosters.
Pirates ruined it for the rest, as they were getting luxury tax money for a long time, and giving it to their upper management for bonuses. Enough teams bitched about it, and they put a stop to it, for the most part.
A local sports guy has always said, if teams are going to retool, force them to at least put out competitive teams. And the luxury tax and competitive balance picks are rewarded by win marks. If you get to 70 and are small market you get full share of tax $ and picks.
60 wins you get it cut, and your CB pick slides.
50 wins 1/2 of a share,etc.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 11:46 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
but they can. they have ownerships who absolutely can afford these salaries. and they literally get money from the bigger market franchises to pay those players. but they dont
They can't afford to tie up dead money if he's not producing AND replace him with a top level player. The smaller markets have little room for error.
Trading Cutch sucked from a sentimental perspective but it was the right business decision.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 12:01 pm to Bestbank Tiger
And when it comes down to it, the players chose this system.
They wanted petty bullshite over cutting service time. And this is what they deserve and have.
They wanted petty bullshite over cutting service time. And this is what they deserve and have.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 12:03 pm to Bestbank Tiger
is there not a certain percentage of baseball revenue that players MUST get?????
Posted on 1/19/19 at 12:12 pm to CollegeFBRules
If Harper got his 400m 10yr deal
..he would command nearly $12 of every ticket sold in STL (near the top of the league in attendance) and nearly $35 of every ticket sold in places like Pitt Oak TB. And thats a commitment for every ticket for the next 10 yrs. Granted team revenue is more than tix sales but..
..he would command nearly $12 of every ticket sold in STL (near the top of the league in attendance) and nearly $35 of every ticket sold in places like Pitt Oak TB. And thats a commitment for every ticket for the next 10 yrs. Granted team revenue is more than tix sales but..
Posted on 1/19/19 at 12:43 pm to CollegeFBRules
quote:
It’s not your money, it’s money that players
The money that belongs to the owners?
Ha, so far out of touch with reality. As must multimillionaires are.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 12:47 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
is there not a certain percentage of baseball revenue that players MUST get?????
Yes, but i believe it's one of the lower %, in all of the pro leagues(MLS not included).
But again, the MLBPA agreed to this, even when they had ALL the power. But chose petty shite like better meals before games, after, etc. It was laughable what their last contract demands were, instead of things like this.
Posted on 1/19/19 at 4:03 pm to lsusa
quote:
Those that do the work see very little for their compensation in comparison to those that simply had money to start with.
Are you serious with this shite?
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News