- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So did the Big XII officials hose Pellini and Huskers
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:35 pm
because they do not want them to win the conference their last year? Seems to be the case.
2
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:36 pm to Africom
All they have to do is beat CO and they're in the title game.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:42 pm to Esarhaddon
quote:
All they have to do is beat CO and they're in the title game.
exactly. they picked a shity game to put the fix in. Now if they get screwed next week, we can talk.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:42 pm to Africom
They called penalties because Nebraska committed penalties... end of story.
ESPN: Big 12 Blog
quote:
That said, the flag discrepancy (16-2, in favor of Texas A&M) doesn't tell the whole story. Both pass interference calls and the PI that officials initially flagged on Texas A&M but later waved off were the right calls, and Nebraska was flagged for just one holding penalty, football's most subjective penalty. The vast majority of the Huskers' other penalties were personal fouls, false starts or illegal procedures. Those are mental errors, not conspiring flag-tossers with a mandate from league headquarters in (gasp!) Texas.
ESPN: Big 12 Blog
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:45 pm to GerryDiNardo
Did the refs swallow their whistles on more than a few aggy holding penalties? Sure, but like they always say you can call holding on every play if you really want to.
The 2 penalties late that Nebraska keeps pointing to as "game changers" were, but they were also the right call.
Should aTm have had more penalties? Yeah they should have. Would it have made a difference? Probably. Was it a conspiracy by the Big XII to hold down Nebraska? Nope.
The 2 penalties late that Nebraska keeps pointing to as "game changers" were, but they were also the right call.
Should aTm have had more penalties? Yeah they should have. Would it have made a difference? Probably. Was it a conspiracy by the Big XII to hold down Nebraska? Nope.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:47 pm to Atari
The roughing the passer on Tanneyhill was just absurd it cost NU the game they were off the field until that call
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:49 pm to sms151t
quote:
The roughing the passer on Tanneyhill was just absurd it cost NU the game they were off the field until that call
It was called because the NU player lead with his helmet. Watch the replay and you can clearly see it.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:50 pm to Atari
quote:
Did the refs swallow their whistles on more than a few aggy holding penalties? Sure, but like they always say you can call holding on every play if you really want to.
The 2 penalties late that Nebraska keeps pointing to as "game changers" were, but they were also the right call.
Should aTm have had more penalties? Yeah they should have. Would it have made a difference? Probably. Was it a conspiracy by the Big XII to hold down Nebraska? Nope.
In conclusion, should a team who didn't even score a TD be bitching about the refs? Nope.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:50 pm to GerryDiNardo
Hit him with Facemask in chest like you're taught he didn't lower his head
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:50 pm to sms151t
quote:
The roughing the passer on Tanneyhill was just absurd it cost NU the game they were off the field until that call
No it didn't cost them the game. They got the ball back with over 3 minutes and couldn't score.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:52 pm to Don K Punch
aTm wouldn't been able to drive they hadn't all night. I give aTm credit, but that call cost NU the game
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:55 pm to GerryDiNardo
No way that's roughing the passer.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:56 pm to sms151t
quote:
aTm wouldn't been able to drive they hadn't all night. I give aTm credit, but that call cost NU the game
A&M ended with more yards than Nebraska... What cost NU the game was the inability to put the ball into the EZ.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:56 pm to vuvuzela
quote:
No way that's roughing the passer.
It's clearly leading with his helmet, which is what the call was.. It wasn't late by any means and was the only questionable call of the night.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:58 pm to GerryDiNardo
I was wrong after watching it. He did drop his head but hit him with shoulder. That wasn't roughing.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:58 pm to GerryDiNardo
quote:
It's clearly leading with his helmet, which is what the call was.
This can be called on every tackle then. I have no dog in the fight, I'm neither for NU or A&M, but if they start calling 15 yarders on every hit like that...I'll stop watching college football.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:58 pm to GerryDiNardo
That is not roughing the passer. Bad call.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 4:59 pm to vuvuzela
Whether or not you agree, he clearly led with his helmet which is a point of emphasis in the NFL and college. Especially on the QB.
Posted on 11/21/10 at 5:01 pm to GerryDiNardo
Why is everyone acting like this is the world's first bad call... it did not decide the game and Nebraska needs to STFU and get over it...THEY LOST
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News