- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sark After Dark, Hector against Black Bart
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:21 am to G The Tiger Fan
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:21 am to G The Tiger Fan
I’m positive that the PF is supposed to stand it’s PF WITH targeting
Ok, I’m wrong. Adam fricked up...Drink
Ok, I’m wrong. Adam fricked up...Drink
This post was edited on 9/30/17 at 12:22 am
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:21 am to CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Hercules Hercules Hercules
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:22 am to UltimaParadox
Now the fricker sounds retarded trying to make excuses
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:22 am to Cap Crunch
They changed it and added variables.
Can be called "Personal Foul WITH Targeting" = 15 yard penalty no matter what.
Personal Foul Targeting = if review is reversed, no penalty yards.
Can be called "Personal Foul WITH Targeting" = 15 yard penalty no matter what.
Personal Foul Targeting = if review is reversed, no penalty yards.
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:22 am to Fus0623
If the personal foul is the targeting, it wouldn't make sense for the penalty to stand if the targeting was overturned. That's why they changed it last year.
This post was edited on 9/30/17 at 12:23 am
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:22 am to Fus0623
The announcer is butt hurt about that PF being overturned. 
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:22 am to sms151t
Was that our first Song Girls sighting?
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:23 am to FinebaumsHair
What did you do to Finebaum's hair?
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:23 am to G The Tiger Fan
Announcers made same mistake last week during a reversed targeting call in Arky-A&M game
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:23 am to The Quiet One
quote:I didn't know this. Seems pretty technical. Is "Personal foul with targeting" two different fouls on the same play? I would think so.
Can be called "Personal Foul WITH Targeting" = 15 yard penalty no matter what.
Personal Foul Targeting = if review is reversed, no penalty yards.
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:23 am to Asharad
I think when you look up targeting in the dictionary there is a picture of Craig Lawston. Only guy I ever saw get a penalty for forming the intent to target.
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:23 am to Fus0623
Yes sir we need more Song Girls
But Othello posted son earlier so technically no
But Othello posted son earlier so technically no
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:24 am to Mr. Elvert
quote:Damn bro that's the play I was thinking of. Good memory. Yeah the announcers said the same shite and never corrected themselves.
Announcers made same mistake last week during a reversed targeting call in Arky-A&M game
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:25 am to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Pullman is right on the border. Moscow just on the other side. I thought Spokane wasn't too far away. I guess not.
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:25 am to G The Tiger Fan
Not near chubby enough for ole Slick Willie
Posted on 9/30/17 at 12:26 am to CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
People talk about Pullman like it is in another dimension.
Popular
Back to top


3






