- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saban expected to be named co-chair of the Presidential Commission studying college sports
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:22 pm to sabbertooth
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:22 pm to sabbertooth
quote:
Who is the prominent business man that will be the other co chair?
A billionaire who is Texas Tech’s primary donor
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:30 pm to catfish 62
“I don’t understand”
Correct
Correct
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:00 pm to lepdagod
Call Saban and ask him, he obviously has ideas or wouldn’t be joining a Presidential task force just to do it.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:06 pm to Morpheus
quote:
Call Saban and ask him, he obviously has ideas or wouldn’t be joining a Presidential task force just to do it.
This exactly what he doing… what could possibly come of this a court wouldn’t strike down… it’s basically comes down to you can’t infringe on the right to earn
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:15 pm to HTowntiger1Jr
Why? He's a never Trumper.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:32 pm to lepdagod
Sure they can, they are in college receiving a free degree and they weren’t getting paid legitimately for a 100 years.
U suggesting that the NCAA and this task force can’t put in restraints and restrictions is just silly.
U suggesting that the NCAA and this task force can’t put in restraints and restrictions is just silly.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:45 pm to Morpheus
quote:
they are in college receiving a free degree and they weren’t getting paid legitimately for a 100 years.
This statement explains exactly what got us here… you can’t be a billion dollar industry and expect to pay your employees in free degrees… a coach can’t take a 10 million dollar salary and honestly justify to a kid he doesn’t deserves to get paid when said kid is actually the reason said coach is getting paid
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:57 pm to lepdagod
quote:
it’s basically comes down to you can’t infringe on the right to earn
This is the part though that I genuinely don’t understand. It’s a volunteer activity. No one is stopping them from finding alternative ways to earn. And for the record, I’m not saying they shouldn’t get paid. I just don’t get why an organization that is strictly voluntary can’t have guidelines that people can either follow or do something else. I.e you want to be in this organization, you’ll follow our rules, no matter how stupid they may be
I mean, where does it end? So a coach says if you don’t come to practice, you don’t play. Then a kid misses practice, doesn’t play, then sues because he claims his right to earn has been infringed?
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:58 pm to Obi-Wan Tiger
Not only that but this is a charity/donation based situation. It has nothing to do with free market capitalism
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:02 pm to Obi-Wan Tiger
quote:
It’s a volunteer activity. No one is stopping them from finding alternative ways to earn.
By this definition what job isn’t??? The only caveat is people want them to do this one for free.. the degree argument fails because in what other money-making business would they tell you to work for a certification in lieu of payment.. not a trade school situation… I mean actually work
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:13 pm to lepdagod
It’s a charity salary that’s breaking its own rules and you think it’s a 1 for 1 with a normal, regulated industry or profession? Lmfao
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:14 pm to lepdagod
quote:
By this definition what job isn’t???
That’s my whole point. If I don’t like the rules at my company, I can go somewhere else. Take the whole work from home situation. If a company doesn’t allow a person to do that, should they be able to sue under the guise of “you’re infringing on my right to earn money.”
As I say, I’m fine with these guys getting what they can. What I’m not fine with is, there doesn’t seem to be any rule that these organizations have where a court isn’t going to rule against them.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:15 pm to lepdagod
quote:
By this definition what job isn’t??? The only caveat is people want them to do this one for free.. the degree argument fails because in what other money-making business would they tell you to work for a certification in lieu of payment.. not a trade school situation… I mean actually work
Except they didn’t do it for free, they got tuition, stipends and perks that no other student gets that are worth hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Should players be able to make money off commercials or a YouTube channel or doing autograph shows? Absolutely. Do they need to make a salary? Absolutely the frick not
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:19 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
They’re being educated for their vocation as well which is what you do in college. Unless this guy thinks the NFL is scouring neighborhoods and backyards for their players.
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:19 pm to Obi-Wan Tiger
quote:
there doesn’t seem to be any rule that these organizations have where a court isn’t going to rule against them.
This was my point… which gets right back to not being able to infringe on a person’s right to earn… how can a body regulate what a outside entity is willing to pay you,,. Specifically for your name, image and likeness… do these not belong to you???.. it’s silly on its premise that a 18 year old would’ve allowed to sign these away
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:23 pm to ChanceOfRainIsNever
quote:
Except they didn’t do it for free, they got tuition, stipends and perks that no other student gets
Courts have decided this won’t suffice,,, everything you named the player is trading labor for… their name, image and likeness should not be included in that agreement… you don’t agree???
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:24 pm to lepdagod
The rules of NIL were broken in the very first NIL deal which means they never existed. NIL is nothing more than a sales pill for ignorant fans to swallow.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:25 pm to Madking
quote:
The rules of NIL were broken in the very first NIL deal which means they never existed. NIL is nothing more than a sales pill for ignorant fans to swallow.
That’s a different argument
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:28 pm to lepdagod
Tried to tell you guys this before it started. This scam is a tactic to drive up the price of players so that programs can’t afford to pay them at which point the networks and their partners will step in to pay and assume total control of the sport. Thats always been the plan of NIL to separate the players from the programs in order to control the sport, basically replacing NCAA.
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:29 pm to lepdagod
“That’s a different argument”
Is it? You’re using the illusion of it to justify your position.
Is it? You’re using the illusion of it to justify your position.
Back to top



0



