Started By
Message

re: Saban expected to be named co-chair of the Presidential Commission studying college sports

Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
24588 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Who is the prominent business man that will be the other co chair?

A billionaire who is Texas Tech’s primary donor
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66960 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 3:30 pm to
“I don’t understand”


Correct
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 3:34 pm
Posted by Morpheus
In your Dreams
Member since Apr 2022
7287 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:00 pm to
Call Saban and ask him, he obviously has ideas or wouldn’t be joining a Presidential task force just to do it.
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5560 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Call Saban and ask him, he obviously has ideas or wouldn’t be joining a Presidential task force just to do it.


This exactly what he doing… what could possibly come of this a court wouldn’t strike down… it’s basically comes down to you can’t infringe on the right to earn
Posted by theCrusher
Slidell
Member since Nov 2007
1585 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:15 pm to
Why? He's a never Trumper.
Posted by Morpheus
In your Dreams
Member since Apr 2022
7287 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:32 pm to
Sure they can, they are in college receiving a free degree and they weren’t getting paid legitimately for a 100 years.

U suggesting that the NCAA and this task force can’t put in restraints and restrictions is just silly.
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5560 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

they are in college receiving a free degree and they weren’t getting paid legitimately for a 100 years.


This statement explains exactly what got us here… you can’t be a billion dollar industry and expect to pay your employees in free degrees… a coach can’t take a 10 million dollar salary and honestly justify to a kid he doesn’t deserves to get paid when said kid is actually the reason said coach is getting paid
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 4:47 pm
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
8126 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

it’s basically comes down to you can’t infringe on the right to earn


This is the part though that I genuinely don’t understand. It’s a volunteer activity. No one is stopping them from finding alternative ways to earn. And for the record, I’m not saying they shouldn’t get paid. I just don’t get why an organization that is strictly voluntary can’t have guidelines that people can either follow or do something else. I.e you want to be in this organization, you’ll follow our rules, no matter how stupid they may be

I mean, where does it end? So a coach says if you don’t come to practice, you don’t play. Then a kid misses practice, doesn’t play, then sues because he claims his right to earn has been infringed?
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66960 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 4:58 pm to
Not only that but this is a charity/donation based situation. It has nothing to do with free market capitalism
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5560 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

It’s a volunteer activity. No one is stopping them from finding alternative ways to earn.


By this definition what job isn’t??? The only caveat is people want them to do this one for free.. the degree argument fails because in what other money-making business would they tell you to work for a certification in lieu of payment.. not a trade school situation… I mean actually work
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 5:08 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66960 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:13 pm to
It’s a charity salary that’s breaking its own rules and you think it’s a 1 for 1 with a normal, regulated industry or profession? Lmfao
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
8126 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

By this definition what job isn’t???


That’s my whole point. If I don’t like the rules at my company, I can go somewhere else. Take the whole work from home situation. If a company doesn’t allow a person to do that, should they be able to sue under the guise of “you’re infringing on my right to earn money.”

As I say, I’m fine with these guys getting what they can. What I’m not fine with is, there doesn’t seem to be any rule that these organizations have where a court isn’t going to rule against them.
Posted by ChanceOfRainIsNever
Far from Louisiana
Member since Oct 2016
2771 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

By this definition what job isn’t??? The only caveat is people want them to do this one for free.. the degree argument fails because in what other money-making business would they tell you to work for a certification in lieu of payment.. not a trade school situation… I mean actually work


Except they didn’t do it for free, they got tuition, stipends and perks that no other student gets that are worth hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Should players be able to make money off commercials or a YouTube channel or doing autograph shows? Absolutely. Do they need to make a salary? Absolutely the frick not
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66960 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:19 pm to
They’re being educated for their vocation as well which is what you do in college. Unless this guy thinks the NFL is scouring neighborhoods and backyards for their players.
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 5:19 pm
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5560 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

there doesn’t seem to be any rule that these organizations have where a court isn’t going to rule against them.


This was my point… which gets right back to not being able to infringe on a person’s right to earn… how can a body regulate what a outside entity is willing to pay you,,. Specifically for your name, image and likeness… do these not belong to you???.. it’s silly on its premise that a 18 year old would’ve allowed to sign these away
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5560 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Except they didn’t do it for free, they got tuition, stipends and perks that no other student gets


Courts have decided this won’t suffice,,, everything you named the player is trading labor for… their name, image and likeness should not be included in that agreement… you don’t agree???
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66960 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:24 pm to
The rules of NIL were broken in the very first NIL deal which means they never existed. NIL is nothing more than a sales pill for ignorant fans to swallow.
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
5560 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

The rules of NIL were broken in the very first NIL deal which means they never existed. NIL is nothing more than a sales pill for ignorant fans to swallow.


That’s a different argument
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66960 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:28 pm to
Tried to tell you guys this before it started. This scam is a tactic to drive up the price of players so that programs can’t afford to pay them at which point the networks and their partners will step in to pay and assume total control of the sport. Thats always been the plan of NIL to separate the players from the programs in order to control the sport, basically replacing NCAA.
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 5:31 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66960 posts
Posted on 5/8/25 at 5:29 pm to
“That’s a different argument”


Is it? You’re using the illusion of it to justify your position.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram