Started By
Message

re: Ryan Howard struck out twice tonight in 4 at bats

Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:42 am to
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62257 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:42 am to
quote:

also, if Kurt Warner has the best receiving corps in football and Matt Hasselbeck has the worst their stats become a little skewed. Warner could have 20 Td passes and that stat could be less impressive than Hasselbeck's 15.
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24474 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:43 am to
i just didn't want to use real names just to keep it hypothetical.
Posted by LSUsmartass
Scompton
Member since Sep 2004
82743 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:43 am to
I will agree baseball is more individualized, but it also has it moments where its more of a team effort than football. I only jumped into this argument because there are posters who firmly believe RBIs should be taken stricken from the stats book.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62257 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:45 am to
quote:

Joe DiMaggio
361 HR
369 K


So Howard will have more strike outs in 2 years than Joe Dimaggio had in 15 years. What side of the arguement are you on?
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216458 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:48 am to
quote:

Ted Williams
521 HR
709 K


Teddy ballgame won Multiple triple crowns!! Something Howard will never sniff!!!
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24474 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:49 am to
quote:

I only jumped into this argument because there are posters who firmly believe RBIs should be taken stricken from the stats book.


I wouldn't ever go this far. w-l yes. RBIs no.

I think you can put most hitters stats into some context but what bothers me is when they get overvalued ie. selecting MVPs, HOF, and that sort of thing. RBIs is definitely one of those stats, same with batting average.

Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24474 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:51 am to
as a side note the strike out thing is HIGHLY overrated IMO. If a hitter has 600 ABs in a season and hits .500 with 300Ks then what? He sucks with all the Ks, or he's great cause when he didn't K he did awesome?

A K is an out, the same as a flyout or groundout.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62257 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:53 am to
quote:

A K is an out, the same as a flyout or groundout.


Negative

A groundout to the right side or a deep flyout will move a runner/possibly score a run. A K isn't going to move shite.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:54 am to
Just pointing out that there was a day when big HR numbers didn't automatically mean big K numbers also.
Strikeouts are unproductive outs.
Any kind of contact will put runners and defense in motion, and force the defense to make a play.
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24474 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:55 am to
I know that, but when talking about someone like Howard or Dunn who end up with high RBI #s in the end, I don't factor this as much.

Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62257 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:56 am to
quote:

Strikeouts are unproductive outs.
Any kind of contact will put runners and defense in motion, and force the defense to make a play.


quote:

A groundout to the right side or a deep flyout will move a runner/possibly score a run. A K isn't going to move shite.


We are in agreement.
Posted by LSUsmartass
Scompton
Member since Sep 2004
82743 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:56 am to
quote:

I know that, but when talking about someone like Howard or Dunn who end up with high RBI #s in the end, I don't factor this as much.

But RBIs are overrated
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62257 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:57 am to
quote:

But RBIs are overrated


It's a vicious cycle isn't it?
Posted by LSUsmartass
Scompton
Member since Sep 2004
82743 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 1:59 am to
quote:

It's a vicious cycle isn't it?


I was going to say the RBIs people vs the OBP people are arguing over the chicken and egg
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24474 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 2:05 am to
quote:

But RBIs are overrated


this is what I meant by accepting stats into a certain context. It means they're driving in runs somehow even with their high k numbers.

again RBIs aren't a worthless stat to me, I just don't value you them nearly as much as others.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 2:09 am to
There are a number of ways to drive home a runner from 3rd, but a strikeout isn't one of them.
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24474 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 2:11 am to
quote:

but a strikeout isn't one of them.


dropped 3rd strike.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 2:14 am to
Dropped 3rd strike?
And the hitter causes that exactly how?
Posted by LfcSU3520
Arizona
Member since Dec 2003
24474 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 2:16 am to
quote:

And the hitter causes that exactly how?


who cares, the run comes in exactly the same as it would if he hit a pissrod to the rightfielder.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 7/13/08 at 2:20 am to
Let me rephrase, then-
There are a number of ways for a HITTER to drive in a run from third without actually making a base hit, but a strikeout isn't one of them.
This post was edited on 7/13/08 at 2:23 am
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram