- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Report: Hamlin did not have pre-existing cardiac issues; collision was cause of incident
Posted on 1/11/23 at 11:39 am to lsupride87
Posted on 1/11/23 at 11:39 am to lsupride87
So no report coming? Just that a statement that he is being released? And what you linked was the statement? Nothing stating collision was cause of the incident as you claim in the OP? Got it.
Nope. Please provide the report that supports the title of the thread you started. TIA.
quote:
Cat got your tongue now?
Nope. Please provide the report that supports the title of the thread you started. TIA.
Posted on 1/11/23 at 11:46 am to BBONDS25
quote:Are you legit slow? WHere did I or the person I quoted ever say a medical report was coming?
Nope. Please provide the report that supports the title of the thread you started. TIA.
TIA
This post was edited on 1/11/23 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/11/23 at 11:48 am to lsupride87
quote:
Are you legit slow? Here did I or the person o quoted ever say a medical report was coming?
Yet you still created this thread. Nothing to substantiate the conclusion you made. It very well may be true, but nothing you have posted provides that information. I think you are confused about what makes someone slow. Asking for evidence to support a claim isn’t slow, it should be the norm.
Posted on 1/11/23 at 11:51 am to BBONDS25
Yes, I started a thread based on the reporting from the individual in the OP. And nowhere did I or the individual in the OP say a detailed medical report was coming. He made it clear he was getting his info from a hospital source
So, the only one who lied is you so far when you verbatim said the reporter said a detailed report was coming
So, the only one who lied is you so far when you verbatim said the reporter said a detailed report was coming
Posted on 1/11/23 at 11:56 am to lsupride87
quote:
Yes, I started a thread based on the reporting from the individual in the OP. And nowhere did I or the individual in the OP say a detailed medical report was coming. He made it clear he was getting his info from a hospital source So, the only one who lied is you so far when you verbatim said the reporter said a detailed report was coming
K. I’m fine you saying I am a liar. I am just glad we finally got to the bottom of the issue. Your OP is not based upon any fact that can be cited. It is simply parroting the conclusion of a CNN journalist.
Posted on 1/11/23 at 11:57 am to BBONDS25
quote:Well yeh
I’m fine you saying I am a liar
Simple question, was this a lie?
quote:
He said a report was being released
Posted on 1/11/23 at 11:58 am to lsupride87
quote:
Simple question, was this a lie? quote:He said a report was being released
Well, I got that from this sentence in your OP.
quote:
Doctors report will be released shortly
Posted on 1/11/23 at 11:58 am to lsupride87
I think your thread title goes a little further than the tweet does.
You state conclusively that he “did not have” preexisting and that the collision was the cause. Tweet says doctors are finishing tests and that the tests are ongoing (ie not complete) and that it “appears” the collision was the cause.
Also, you said a doctors report would be released.
This post was edited on 1/11/23 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:01 pm to Earnest_P
Is frisky said this
Would you say that it’s clear I am referring to the medical update that I quoted below?
Or, instead, you wouldn’t read my direct quote below and infer I am talking of a detailed medical report?
quote:
Doctors report will be released shortly
quote:
quote:
Hospital plans to release a written health update within coming hours. There is also optimism that Damar Hamlin will be deemed well enough to be released from Buffalo General within 24 to 48 hours
Would you say that it’s clear I am referring to the medical update that I quoted below?
Or, instead, you wouldn’t read my direct quote below and infer I am talking of a detailed medical report?
This post was edited on 1/11/23 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:01 pm to Jack Ruby
quote:
The hit likely caused a pulmonary embolism from dislodging a clot.
This inaccurate statement stems from a complete lack of understanding of the pathophysiology in a variety of ways.
Where do you think the clot was "lodged" in his chest? You think he had a giant clot in in right atria or Superior vena cava and was completely asympmtomatic?
When PEs cause people to die, it is from acute right heart failure and/or profound hypoxia. These clots are very big. These patients are VERY difficult to regain pulses in because the acidosis that rapidly develops when you lose pulses makes RV function even worse. He responded to a single round of CPR and defibrillation (had a shockable rhythm (Vtach or Vfib)- which is very rare as the presenting rhythm for PE).
Where do you think this clot magically went after 1 round of CPR?
Once they got him back, he was intubated and remained hemodynamically stable (despite the increase in intrathoracic pressure than comes form invasive ventilation, which would put additional strain on the right ventricle if he had a large PE) in the back of the EMS truck while they waited for his mom. IF you can regain pulses in patients with massive PE without lysing (use of a clot busting agent like tPA)(which they didn't), they are hypotensive and usually require inotropic agents to bridge them to intervention. If he had a massive PE he would have been profoundly unstable until they removed the clot (done via embolectomy in most large institutions and catheter directed lysis in some other places I've worked).
It could be argued that he had an underlying condition (long QT, WPW, HOCM, Brugada, ARVD) or acute pericarditis (unlikely given he was asymptomatic before the hit)that put him at risk for Vtach/Vfib and the hit just so happened to take place just before it happened (this is not a good argument, but is at least pathophysiologically plausible). Him having no findings on EKG reported thus far for any of these conditions effectively rules it out but it was at least possible based on the sequence of events (loss of pulses, CPR, defibrillation, ROSC, hemodynamic stability without further intervention).
Based on the sequence of events, there is no chance this was caused by a pulmonary embolism.
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:03 pm to lsupride87
Once again, trust the science.
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:03 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Would you say that it’s clear I am referring to the medical update that I quoted below?
Did you say a Dr report was coming or not? Then you want to get mad at people asking for a report?
It’s silly to even argue this. This entire thread is a failure. Pure conjecture of a cnn reporter being listed as facts.
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Correct. There is no way at this point ylu still beleive it had any pre-existing component with the news of his release
It’s silly to even argue this.
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:10 pm to studentforlife
This is what I come to TD for 
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:18 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Correct. There is no way at this point ylu still beleive it had any pre-existing component with the news of his release
Are you saying folks that have heart attacks due to pre-existing conditions are not released from the hospital after 9 days?
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:20 pm to BBONDS25
quote:I am saying people that have heart attacks to the point of dying and being revived don’t walk out the hospital 9 days later without surgery and a release to cardio rehab. Yes I am saying that. I know 3 separate people that had minor heart attacks. They all needed procedures while in the hospital
Are you saying folks that have heart attacks due to pre-existing conditions are not released from the hospital after 9 days?
Has it happened maybe a few times? I’m sure, but that would such a freaking outlier it isn’t worth discussing
This post was edited on 1/11/23 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:22 pm to lsupride87
quote:
I am saying people that have heart attacks to the point of dying and being revived don’t walk out the hospital 9 days later without surgery and a release to cardio rehab. Yes I am saying that. I know 3 separate people that had minor heart attacks. They all needed procedures while in the hospital
Excellent. I’m no doc, but perhaps someone who is will chime in. This should be easy to confirm.
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:29 pm to studentforlife
quote:
Based on the sequence of events, there is no chance this was caused by a pulmonary embolism.
"You just want him to die so you can be right"!
Sincerely,
OP
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:42 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Please provide the report that supports the title of the thread you started.
Thread titled started like this
quote:
Report:
What report? You mean the CNN rumor guy? Thats your report? LoL
quote:
Hamlin did not have pre-existing cardiac issues
Yeah, most young people dropping dead from cardiac issues, that are vaxxed, didnt either. Or they would not have been still playing sports. Not sure why this is a victory lap for you
quote:
collision was cause of incident
Really? I missed that in the report you linked
In fact, we all missed the medical report that you linked stating the cause
Posted on 1/11/23 at 12:46 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Sorry man, Hamlins heart looks good.
So odd. Doctors are sending him to a world class rehab facility at the Bills offices, and also rehabbing at home
quote:
continue his rehabilitation at home and with the Bills
Sounds like Damars heart still needs work
Popular
Back to top


1






