Started By
Message
locked post

Raising the Goal from 10ft to 11ft in the NBA

Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:18 pm
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
12449 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:18 pm
I'm curious how the game might be affected by this slight variation. Would y'all support this change or be against it? Personally, I don't think it's impressive when a guy with a 7 foot wingspan dunks when he barely has to get off the ground to do so. Maybe it would ruin the impact of rim protectors, but it'd be an improvement to the entertainment aspect of the game based off sheer athleticism needed to throw it down. Plus, hitting a deep three seems to be more appealing to fans nowawdays than most uncontested dunks so what's there to lose? This has probably been discussed on here at length before, but I think it's becoming more of a relevant question to ask since the overall athleticism of players has been going up and up for decades.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
28019 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:19 pm to
What's the point?
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87519 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:19 pm to
Why would you mess with something like that?
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:20 pm to
low IQ post of the year nominee
Posted by vengeanceofrain
depends
Member since Jun 2013
12465 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:20 pm to
are u serious? every player in the world has spent their entire lives shooting on a 10 ft goal shooting at that point is muscle memory it would ruin basketball
Posted by CyrustheVirus
Member since Jan 2013
2909 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:20 pm to
Good call. Pitchers throw harder and runners run faster now so let's make the pitcher pitch from 70 feet and the bases 100 feet. Let's also move the fences back so less balls leave the yard. You know how fans hate seeing homeruns. While we are at it, we can make the football field smaller so there is less room to run. Points will go down which US sports fans love.
This post was edited on 1/2/17 at 2:22 pm
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
12449 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:23 pm to
So y'all aren't in favor and don't see any point. Thanks for the feedback.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91523 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

are u serious? every player in the world has spent their entire lives shooting on a 10 ft goal shooting at that point is muscle memory it would ruin basketball

Think long term. Basketball would be awesome again in ~20 years.
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
12449 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:24 pm to
You do know college baseball fields are smaller than the professional ballparks, right? And they use wooden bats in the pros, but I mean, what's the point? Baseball players have been using aluminum bats since tee ball.
This post was edited on 1/2/17 at 2:25 pm
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
28019 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:26 pm to
No they aren't. College fields are comparable to professional fields as far as the distance of the fence, and the exact same from the mound to home and the baselines.
This post was edited on 1/2/17 at 2:30 pm
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88185 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:27 pm to
So you want to see the athleticism in the game taken away and more emphasis placed on fundamentals?


So you basically want to see the game turned into the WNBA
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
28019 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:28 pm to
College players use aluminum bats because it is cheaper for schools because aluminum bats last much longer than wooden bats.
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
12449 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

A difference between college and professional baseball is the size. The fields in the MLB are bigger. I don’t mean the bases because the bases are each ninety feet away in pro and college. I mean the fences. The fences are further by a good amount, “In the NCAA the fences average about 350 feet, whereas in the MLB the fences average to about 380 feet” (Haas1). The difference in size is not only in the field, but in the players. The players are increasingly bigger in MLB than in college. You wouldn’t want a 5 foot 9 inch kid pitching against a 6 foot 6 inch 220 pound all star hitter.
Posted by ZZTIGERS
Member since Dec 2007
17372 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:30 pm to
I think NASCAR should make rule that all drivers must have a BAC of at least .1 before any race. Left turns have never been so much fun.
Posted by CyrustheVirus
Member since Jan 2013
2909 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:31 pm to
[quote]You do know college baseball fields are smaller than the professional ballparks, right? And they use wooden bats in the pros, but I mean, what's the point? Baseball players have been using aluminum bats since tee ball.[/quote

Most college and pro fields are very similar in size. But I'll bite, woods bats for pros are like the longer 3 pointer in NBA.
Posted by vengeanceofrain
depends
Member since Jun 2013
12465 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:32 pm to
pedro was 5 ft 10
Posted by Da Blitz
Member since Dec 2016
145 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:36 pm to
Out law dunking
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
28019 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:36 pm to
Maybe on average because there are so many colleges with a lot of variation in field sizes. But in general, college parks are comparable to professional. Take LSU's field and compare it to Tropicana field:

LSU: left: 330, right: 330, center: 405

Tropicana: left: 315, right: 322, center: 404



How about Florida State? left: 340, right: 320, center: 400


North Carolina: left: 335, right: 340, center: 400

Pick any random D1 school.
This post was edited on 1/2/17 at 2:40 pm
Posted by TechDawg2007
Bawville
Member since Nov 2007
32576 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:38 pm to
Let's make an NFL field 150 yards long then
Posted by ZZTIGERS
Member since Dec 2007
17372 posts
Posted on 1/2/17 at 2:39 pm to
Greg Maddux was 6'0 195. Marcus Stroman for the Blue Jays is 5'8 180. Pitching is a different animal, size certainly doesn't dictate your effectiveness.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram