- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Prime Ali vs. Prime Mike Tyson
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:18 am to Boodis Man
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:18 am to Boodis Man
quote:
Prime Ali is just a bad match up for tyson
Prime Ali is a bad match up for anybody.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:35 am to Rankest
Cassius Clay was the GOAT.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:40 am to olemc999
quote:
Name Tysons best win
Spinks was his most iconic win.
Berbick was historically significant.
Holmes had the best resume.
Tyson himself says it’s Ruddock.
Spinks was a blown up Cruiserweight
Holmes was an old man
Berbick and Ruddock were nothing burgers.
Tyson boxed in a horrible era of heavyweights.
Had he boxed in the 70's he would have just been another guy.
Ali would have been a nightmare matchup for Tyson.
6'3", reach, speed, and arguably the best chin in heavyweight history.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 11:52 am to All Hat
If we really could have these all time heavyweight matches Ali (Clay) would be the betting favorite against any champion in the history of boxing.
I am not saying he would win every match up, just that he would be favored.
For boxing fans there is a good YouTube channel named Fantasy Fights 2.0 where he matches fighters from different eras, complete with some video highlights, analysis and his prediction of who would win. They are very entertaining. He is knowledgeable and level headed, in my opinion, with his predictions but about 20% of the time I don't agree with his outcome. That is certainly understandable when you are matching up fighters from different eras and guessing how the different styles, power, boxing ability, stamina, chin, determination, etc. would affect the outcome.
Some examples of his Fantasy fights are Corbett vs. Marciano, Fury vs. Foreman (I didn't agree with his choice), Dempsey vs. Johnson, Louis vs. Frazier (didn't agree but this is certainly a 50/50 fight), Usyk vs. Tyson, Hagler vs. Monzon, etc.
He predicted Canelo to beat Crawford in a very close fight, we know how that turned out. Sometimes I think he favors modern boxers slightly more than I would. In my view he doesn't lend enough weight sometimes to the determination, grit and hard life experiences that many of the older fighters had. Those guys were tough!
I am not saying he would win every match up, just that he would be favored.
For boxing fans there is a good YouTube channel named Fantasy Fights 2.0 where he matches fighters from different eras, complete with some video highlights, analysis and his prediction of who would win. They are very entertaining. He is knowledgeable and level headed, in my opinion, with his predictions but about 20% of the time I don't agree with his outcome. That is certainly understandable when you are matching up fighters from different eras and guessing how the different styles, power, boxing ability, stamina, chin, determination, etc. would affect the outcome.
Some examples of his Fantasy fights are Corbett vs. Marciano, Fury vs. Foreman (I didn't agree with his choice), Dempsey vs. Johnson, Louis vs. Frazier (didn't agree but this is certainly a 50/50 fight), Usyk vs. Tyson, Hagler vs. Monzon, etc.
He predicted Canelo to beat Crawford in a very close fight, we know how that turned out. Sometimes I think he favors modern boxers slightly more than I would. In my view he doesn't lend enough weight sometimes to the determination, grit and hard life experiences that many of the older fighters had. Those guys were tough!
Popular
Back to top


0




