Started By
Message

re: Phil Jackson: "LeBron needs to takeover like Michael did"

Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:24 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108582 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Why would you combine two different leagues with zero common opponents (except for one game- the Super Bowl, which he won)

Ok. He was 4th in a leaque with 10 teams.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108582 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:25 pm to
quote:



There was a great analysis done by Pro Football Weekly or some sort...and it was a pure comparison not of today's numbers but solely against your peers...and how much better or worse a modern QB rating would be against your peers.

Namath was near the bottom for the 60's and 70's.

Staubach was #1 for his era...by FAR!

Stabler was #2...by FAR!

Then...

Dawson, etc.

Unitas,

Jurgenson,

Starr

Tarkenton

Lamonica

..........


















Earl Morral...

Then...

Joe Namath.
Exactly. It isnt even arguable. He was never that good
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:26 pm
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

the knock on him is a classic example of comparing incomparable eras
Namath compared to his peers.

Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84359 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:27 pm to
Why are we talking about football
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:28 pm to
Most of those guys are in the Hall. What's your beef - that Stabler should be in? I agree! It took long enough!
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

His stats


Were meh.

Johnny Unitas, Otto Graham, Sonny Jurgenson, and Fran Tarkenton all have substantially better stats.

This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:29 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108582 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Namath compared to his peers.

That is embarrassing That has to be the worst hall of famer in any sport
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108582 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Most of those guys are in the Hall. What's your beef - that Stabler should be in? I agree! It took long enough!

If Joe is in, there should be about 13-14 other guys from the 60s and 70s
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Johnny Unitas, Otto Graham, Sonny Jurgenson, and Fran Tarkenton all have substantially better stats.
They're all in the Hall!
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Dude, careful with accusing others of having their feathers ruffled when you're talking about a tattoo some probably 17 year old kid got 15 years ago, and you've been mentioning it over and over lately.



so rustled.

this finals is going to be tough for you.

which excuse will it be this year? I suggest you go with the usual, "he has no team".
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84359 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:31 pm to
This is the weirdest LeBron thread ever. Usually this board is so obsessed with LeBron they will turn a baseball thread into a LeBron thread. Now, in a LeBron thread, we are talking about Joe Namath?
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:34 pm
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:32 pm to
Again you're comparing pre-merger stats, even pre Super Bowl stats from totally separated leagues.

Also I don't see wins. I believe Bradshaw has some pedestrian stats but gets in on wins

But it goes back to my point when we were actually talking about NBA earlier. There is more than stats. It's the Hall of Fame, not the Hall of Stats. Joe was a highly prized gunslinger and is the most iconic Super Bowl MVP of all time
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:33 pm
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39022 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:34 pm to
You know who loved Joe Namath?

Al Davis...why?

Because he said, Namath could throw the ball a mile.

So could Jay Schroeder and Marc Wilson. Two bums who threw it a mile over everyone's head for a decade for the Raiders. Davis loved mad bombers and big arms.

This description of SChroeder by Jim Murray in the LA Times, could easily apply to Joe Namath for his era.

"He may have an arm like a cannon, but it is a Civil War cannon. You are never sure where the ball is going."

"You see him throw a football and you wonder why he isn't in the Super Bowl. He just flicks a wrist and the ball takes off in an orbital trajectory of a moonshot. His passes look like punts. They're pretty. They spiral through the air like rotating rockets, not like the crashing airplanes some passes resemble. He could probably throw a football through a brick wall or over a tall building. He's the football equivalent of a railroad gun. A football field is almost too small for him.

The only trouble is, pretty as they look, Schroeder is like the long-hitting golfer who hits it out of sight but out of the fairway, too, and whose short game is ragged. Jay has no trouble throwing the ball 75 yards. It's the little swing passes that end up in the wrong hands. If he were a golfer, he'd make the 40-footers and miss the four-footers."

Schroeder has been as enigmatic as a map of Russia. Like the little girl with the curl, when he is good, he is very, very good. When he's not, he throws interceptions.

"Schroeder can look like a combination of Roger Staubach and Joe Montana one time and a combination of Laurel and Hardy another--sometimes in the same game."

That was Joe Namath.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:35 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112626 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

so rustled. this finals is going to be tough for you.
The one where I predicted GS to win easily? That one?

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108582 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:39 pm to
Look at strongs chart. Joe was average, to below average compared to his own peers
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Again you're comparing pre-merger stats, even pre Super Bowl stats from totally separated leagues.

I'm comparing him to all other professional QBs at the time. Comparing him to the other 7 (1965), 8 (1966,1967) or 9 (1968,1969) starting QBs doesn't give an accurate representation.

His stats suck.

If you want to argue that he's a HOFer because of his persona, influence, etc., fine. I understand that. But don't try to argue stats.
quote:

I don't see wins.
62-63-4

Watch out now.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:43 pm
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

I'm comparing him to all other professional QBs at the time.
Do you compare Peyton's stats to the CFL or other semi pro leagues?
quote:

62-63-4

Watch out now.
By year.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:42 pm
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

Do you compare Peyton's stats to the CFL or other semi pro leagues?

No because there are 31 other starting QBs to compare him to. Not 7.
quote:

By year.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:45 pm
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17360 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:43 pm to
What a fricking abortion of a thread.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62289 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:45 pm to
You don't see the fallacy when they aren't playing any of the same competition AT ALL, zip, zero, nada
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram