Started By
Message

re: Only 10 players in NL hitting over .290

Posted on 9/29/25 at 7:02 am to
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
17761 posts
Posted on 9/29/25 at 7:02 am to
Been trending that way for a while. I looked this up a couple of weeks back - in 2000 - 63 batters hit over .300.

Heck if Turner didn't miss about a month recently he probably ain't hitting over .300 either.

It's a combination of things. Power numbers are now more sought after than anything and more and more players are embracing that type of approach to get to and remain in the big leagues. Schwarber is an example - though he actually has better actual hitting for average numbers the last couple of years, he basically got paid his last contract for hitting about .200 but with 40 plus homers.

Also pitcher specialization and improvements in pitch labs that help pitchers maximize and make it tougher on hitters in what is already the most difficult thing to do in sports....hit a baseball.

Posted by Bigdawgb
Member since Oct 2023
3393 posts
Posted on 9/29/25 at 8:56 am to
quote:

So all the data advanced metrics was built on is irrelevant. Thanks for proving my point


What is your point? That batting avg. was higher in the past because fewer pitchers were throwing 95+ gas??

How exactly does that invalidate the entirety of sabermetrics?
This post was edited on 9/29/25 at 8:56 am
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66558 posts
Posted on 9/29/25 at 9:46 am to
I didn’t say it did, the poster I responded to did. As for your false accusation I can’t comment on your silliness.
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
31159 posts
Posted on 9/29/25 at 11:58 am to
batting avg doesn't matter much anymore
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53778 posts
Posted on 9/29/25 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

What is your point? That batting avg. was higher in the past because fewer pitchers were throwing 95+ gas??


This. We all watch LSU. When we get to the regionals next year, and we see a team “run out of pitching”, that means they’re throwing guys who basically couldn’t play in a P4 conference…

years ago they may have been able to, like the stereotypical “junkball” guy from the SWAC that can shut you down for three innings before he gets shelled the second time through the order. That kind of dude would have been able to pitch for a lot more teams years ago.

Or the dude for Long Island who pitched against North Carolina when LSU almost won that regional… they took the lead in the top of the 10th inning and we were so excited to get them in the 1-0 game, but in the bottom they couldn’t get an out (if they did it was only 1) before serving up a meatball that became a walk off grand slam. That dude is probably still having flashbacks.
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2855 posts
Posted on 9/29/25 at 5:14 pm to
I haven't watch a MLB game in about 15 years, and if the league leader is barely over .300 I KNOW I won't be watching it anytime soon. It's already kinda boring, but when you either have strikeouts or homeruns, it's like flag football...what's the point? Just do homerun derby and call it a day.
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20614 posts
Posted on 9/29/25 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

This post incapsulates your ignorance

encapsulates
Posted by TheePalmetto
Member since Aug 2025
1834 posts
Posted on 9/29/25 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

batting avg doesn't matter much anymore


Apparently getting on base period doesn’t matter any more.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram