Started By
Message

One and done rule has killed college basketball

Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:56 am
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25207 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:56 am
It's nothing but aau super teams. Product is terrible right now
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12306 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 8:58 am to
It should be two years or pro, but then again...the top guys probably wouldn't go to college unless they all paid as much as Duke.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145169 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:00 am to
quote:

It's nothing but aau super teams
this applies to maybe 4ish schools a year
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37586 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:02 am to
It doesn’t apply to the NCAA tournament

But the games that are nationally televised in prime time are showcasing these elite freshmen and the AAU style of basketball is wreckless and lacking fundamentals

Their street coaches are looking to win to further themselves, not improving the actual players techniques

ETA - college basketball has had a terrible product for quite a few years. It’s hard to watch at times. AAU is the problem, not the 1 and done
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 9:05 am
Posted by oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2006
26411 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:03 am to
I'll always believe that the NBA should adopt the MLB's policy. Either you come right out of high school or go to college and stay three years. Even two would be ok. That would make college basketball much better if you ask me.
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45794 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:04 am to
Your soon to be #1 team does not have this problem.
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38378 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:07 am to
quote:

I'll always believe that the NBA should adopt the MLB's policy.


I agree, will never happen though.

If it did, you would just see more kids going to Europe to play. Baseball doesn't really have that secondary option
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 9:08 am
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
119193 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:10 am to
As a Kentucky fan (and this probably only applies to Kentucky for the most part), it has it's good and bad side.

We have great talent every year, but generally in the NCAA tourney the inexperience shows, and you lose, then the next year you are starting over essentially.

Senior day used to be epic, now we don't have it anymore, and that's kind of sad.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145169 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:10 am to
There is some movement in the NBA to go back to drafting kids out of high school. Might see a change back in a few years
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70335 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:13 am to
I also think the product would be better if the players went through a more traditional recruitment process to find the right fit rather than just going to the program that paid them the most. I don't care that they're being paid, but simply going to the place that's giving you the most money regardless of if you fit with the school, the coach, or the style of play has been a big factor in the ridiculous number of transfers.

ETA: I don't think the one and done rule is an issue. I think there could be a better CBB product even with the one and done rule. So few players should actually be one and dones. The rule isn't the issue, it's the bad advice.
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 9:17 am
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:19 am to
I think they made this rule to give NBA scouts a year to actually check if these guys are worth a damn
Without the one year in college, the majority of drafts would probably be the top 20 or so Hs recruits
Atleast now they can tell from a year of that ranking was wrong
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86495 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Product is terrible right now


is the product worse than when any good HSers skipped college altogether?
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14652 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:24 am to
It's a hard watch. These dudes are shitty except for the top players.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25878 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:25 am to
quote:

It's nothing but aau super teams. Product is terrible right now


The national championship last rear was UVA and Texas Tech. The other two Final Four teams were Michigan St. and Auburn. None of those are AAU super teams.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19255 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:26 am to
I like the baseball model.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70335 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:26 am to
quote:

I think they made this rule to give NBA scouts a year to actually check if these guys are worth a damn


The one year helps the NBA a lot. The scouting, like you said. The free marketing to make even more people aware of the player. And (kind of goes with the scouting) it's another year of filtering off court behavior as well.
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44567 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:29 am to
go back to letting players turn pro whenever they want to.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70335 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:29 am to
quote:

The national championship last rear was UVA and Texas Tech. The other two Final Four teams were Michigan St. and Auburn. None of those are AAU super teams.


Three of the those four I would consider programs, not just year over year teams. Guys are going in to UVA, Texas Tech, and Michigan State with the expectation of playing for multiple years and following a development plan accordingly. Those programs are exception rather than the rule, not only at the highest level, but throughout college basketball.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:35 am to
quote:

I like the baseball model.


Do all 14 college baseball fans complain about the product ?
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 9:36 am
Posted by Packer
IE, California
Member since May 2017
7810 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Product is terrible right now



Huh? This year is the most wide open it's been in years. None of the "AAU superteams" are overly dominant.
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 9:36 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram