- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not flaming but Chris Paul is NOT a top 5 point guard!
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:03 am to jmelancon1
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:03 am to jmelancon1
quote:
you finally realized your an idiot and left, THANK GOD!
No, I think hes still in the dark about that
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:07 am to grif82
quote:
No, I think hes still in the dark about that
hahahahaha
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:14 am to lsu480
Williams is better IMO, or at least I'd want him on my team before Paul. I think that's a better way to say things than just saying he's "better."
Chauncey currently is a better PG, but will not be in a few years. Chauncey took his lumps early on during his career, and in that adversity, he became the most underrated player in the league. He was the heart and soul of those Pistons' teams, and now he single handedly took a team that was embarrassed in the 1st round last year to a title contender (kinda). If I had to win a game, I'm taking Chauncey over Paul as well.
Parker, no. He has some killer offense, but I don't think he's better than Paul offensively or defensively. He has the experience edge, but it's not enough.
Rondo, lol.
Rose, currently, lol.
Chauncey currently is a better PG, but will not be in a few years. Chauncey took his lumps early on during his career, and in that adversity, he became the most underrated player in the league. He was the heart and soul of those Pistons' teams, and now he single handedly took a team that was embarrassed in the 1st round last year to a title contender (kinda). If I had to win a game, I'm taking Chauncey over Paul as well.
Parker, no. He has some killer offense, but I don't think he's better than Paul offensively or defensively. He has the experience edge, but it's not enough.
Rondo, lol.
Rose, currently, lol.
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:23 am to AlexLSU
quote:
AlexLSU
i'm just glad that we have somebody that actually know's what they're talking about....lol...i totally agree with you on the CP3-Chauncey ordeal
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:26 am to lsu480
quote:
Yeah...hes gonna do that for a long time because he is very talented...he absolutely destroys 24 other PGs which is great...but his playoff #s are gonna always be way below his regular season #s.
If it werent for facts youd be totally correct
Career Regular Season: 19.4ppg 9.9ast 4.8reb 2.4stl 47%fg
Career Playoffs: 23.7ppg 11.4ast 4.9reb 2.1stl 49.4% fg
This post was edited on 4/28/09 at 1:28 am
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:27 am to AlexLSU
you actually make a pretty good case with some actual reasoning......gotta hand it to ya
BTW: I pretty much agree with you.......Paul/Williams/Chauncey are all on the same level with Parker right behind, its just a matter of personal preference as to who you would want on your team
BTW: I pretty much agree with you.......Paul/Williams/Chauncey are all on the same level with Parker right behind, its just a matter of personal preference as to who you would want on your team
This post was edited on 4/28/09 at 1:29 am
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:28 am to eyeran
quote:
Career Regular Season: 19.4ppg 9.9ast 4.8reb 2.4stl 47%fg
Career Playoffs: 23.7ppg 11.4ast 4.9reb 2.1stl 49.4% fg
shhhh......don't let him know that.......lets just keep him in the dark
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:29 am to grif82
quote:
shhhh......don't let him know that.......lets just keep him in the dark
hahahahah, the guy obviously doesn't know his basketball
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:33 am to jmelancon1
Ya, I think his chronic use of pain pills and champagne has taken a toll on his ability to reason and express logical thoughts 
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:35 am to grif82
I just roll with Williams as my #1 because of this:
1. Both Williams and Paul are great on offense. Both can pass, both can score. Williams has more explosion toward the basket, though.
2. Both are great defensively, however, Williams has more flexibility due to his size and speed. Also, whenever CP3 and Deron meet each other, Deron is going to get the best of Paul.
1. Both Williams and Paul are great on offense. Both can pass, both can score. Williams has more explosion toward the basket, though.
2. Both are great defensively, however, Williams has more flexibility due to his size and speed. Also, whenever CP3 and Deron meet each other, Deron is going to get the best of Paul.
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:44 am to AlexLSU
The only reason Paul isn't the consensus #1 PG is because of his size and the disadvantage it puts him when comparing him to Deron IMO
Paul at 6'3" + 20 lb > Deron IMO
I still think Paul is a better ball handler and has a higher basketball IQ than Deron, although I guess you can knock paul for those carrying calls and some of the turnovers hes caused in this series
Paul at 6'3" + 20 lb > Deron IMO
I still think Paul is a better ball handler and has a higher basketball IQ than Deron, although I guess you can knock paul for those carrying calls and some of the turnovers hes caused in this series
This post was edited on 4/28/09 at 1:53 am
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:51 am to AlexLSU
Utah was better with Price at PG last night. DWill might see more time at the 2, that would be a tough backcourt.
This post was edited on 4/28/09 at 1:55 am
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:54 am to Esarhaddon
quote:
DWill might see more time at the 2
DWill can definitely play 2 with his size, just would need to improve is outside game more to be a star at the 2
This post was edited on 4/28/09 at 1:57 am
Posted on 4/28/09 at 1:59 am to grif82
quote:
BTW: I pretty much agree with you.......Paul/Williams/Chauncey are all on the same level with Parker right behind, its just a matter of personal preference as to who you would want on your team
No love for Derek Rose?
Posted on 4/28/09 at 2:01 am to BgwinLSU
Derek Rose not on those 3 level yet........and I mean yet
Posted on 4/28/09 at 2:01 am to BgwinLSU
Dwill/CP are totally different from Chauncey/Parker who are both mostly scorers.
Posted on 4/28/09 at 2:03 am to Esarhaddon
Chauncey and Parker definitely aren't any slouches on defense by no stretch of the imagination.......but I do see your point
Posted on 4/28/09 at 2:04 am to Esarhaddon
quote:
Utah was better with Price at PG last night. DWill might see more time at the 2, that would be a tough backcourt.
DOn't think it would work because Deron is still a PG at heart. I'm not sure they could generate enough offense with two guys trying to set up everyone.
Posted on 4/28/09 at 2:04 am to grif82
quote:
Derek Rose not on those 3 level yet........and I mean yet
Watching the Celtics series ... i really disagree.
Posted on 4/28/09 at 2:09 am to BgwinLSU
quote:
Watching the Celtics series ... i really disagree.
Ya, hes been playing lights out as of late......but he really needs to keep up this level of play throughout a whole season to be considered a top 3 or 4 PG IMO
This post was edited on 4/28/09 at 2:10 am
Popular
Back to top


1


